Phatguysrule
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2008
- Messages
- 21,462
- Likes
- 18,285
- Points
- 113
Yep. NATO might not be a thing if the orange guy had won...Not one inch of NATO territory. - Joe Biden
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. NATO might not be a thing if the orange guy had won...Not one inch of NATO territory. - Joe Biden
Does not appear to have been hit by missiles; the damage from missiles to bridge in Kherson just blew some holes in the road surface. Even a truckload of explosives doesn't seem right. How would that throw entire sections of bridge off to the side. And would have to have been at least two trucks, since there were two separate sections of bridge heavily damaged.. But i don't see how special forces could have got under that bridge. That bridge is probably the most heavily guarded place in the world. Quite a mystery; hope we will hear the story some day....
Only 3 months ago, Russian propaganda was claiming that the Crimea bridge was impossible to attack because of 20 different modes of protection covering it, including military dolphins
![]()
... In an act of terrorPutin angrily bombing civilians
Unless Ukraine comes out and claims they did it, I'm convinced Putin did this. He stands to gain the most from it. How better to both attempt to rally Russian citizens, politicians and the military. And it gives you the perfect excuse to retaliate (which he did leading up the war) and bomb a bunch of Ukrainians and infrastructure.Day 228. Ukraine might be behind the explosion on the Crimean bridge.
Traffic is single file and rail traffic is not fully restored. Also it was the pride of Putin. Add to that Ukraine is not denying it and I say Ukraine did it. I think it was a great move. Ukrainian civilians remain at their peril although I don't blame them for being patriotic and staying.Unless Ukraine comes out and claims they did it, I'm convinced Putin did this. He stands to gain the most from it. How better to both attempt to rally Russian citizens, politicians and the military. And it gives you the perfect excuse to retaliate (which he did leading up the war) and bomb a bunch of Ukrainians and infrastructure.
And the bomb itself doesn't make much sense to me. Ukraine goes to all that trouble to blow up half the road and none of the train tracks? On the other hand Putin can blow up half the road and hours later both the road and the train bridge are allowing traffic through, yet now Putin has both an excuse to escalate and a way to motivate/unite.
I think that Putin took too much pride in the bridge, it was his pet project, built by one of his best friends, He was himself driving the big truck that crossed the bridge to mark the opening.Unless Ukraine comes out and claims they did it, I'm convinced Putin did this. He stands to gain the most from it. How better to both attempt to rally Russian citizens, politicians and the military. And it gives you the perfect excuse to retaliate (which he did leading up the war) and bomb a bunch of Ukrainians and infrastructure.
And the bomb itself doesn't make much sense to me. Ukraine goes to all that trouble to blow up half the road and none of the train tracks? On the other hand Putin can blow up half the road and hours later both the road and the train bridge are allowing traffic through, yet now Putin has both an excuse to escalate and a way to motivate/unite.
It's not like the bridge is gone.I think that Putin took too much pride in the bridge, it was his pet project, built by one of his best friends, He was himself driving the big truck that crossed the bridge to mark the opening.
True, but it hurts russia supply efforts. It seems that destroying a bridge is a process, maybe more will come?It's not like the bridge is gone.
These are tremendous losses if you consider they originally invaded with 160,000 and added maybe 50,000 since (before the mobiliztion).Again seem to have proof that Ukraine is not exaggerating russian combat losses. This is from a russian media source,
"More than 90,000 troops make up Russia’s “irrecoverable” military losses in Ukraine, as reported by the Russian media project iStories (or Vazhnye Istorii). One of the two sources of this information works in the FSB; the other is a former state security officer.
'Irrecoverable losses' is a category that includes servicemen who were killed, went missing, died from their wounds or were disabled and cannot return to military service."
(FSB is like FBI/CIA of russia)
https://meduza.io/en/news/2022/10/1...more-than-90-000-troops-dead-disabled-or-awol
The mobilized forces added to that totally unjust war are nothing more than cannon fodder.These are tremendous losses if you consider they originally invaded with 160,000 and added maybe 50,000 since (before the mobiliztion).
