- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,392
- Likes
- 43,865
- Points
- 113
That would be a decent comparison.So it would be more like, us allowing Texas to leave and then invading 30 years later(if we were Russia), claiming they want to return.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be a decent comparison.So it would be more like, us allowing Texas to leave and then invading 30 years later(if we were Russia), claiming they want to return.
Wouldn't this be about the same as the USA declaring war on Texas, for attempting to leave the states? I dont see us doing that
Abe Lincoln has a bone to pick with you.
barfo
Absolutely not should Ukraine hand over territory to Russia.
1. I'll give you an answer from Prigozhin, russian leader of Wagner military group. Shortly beore he was assasinated he said it was a pure resource grab by russian elite (which includes Putin, possibly the richest man in the world). He said it definitely had nothing to do with fear of NATO. Actions by russian since they invaded bear this out as they have stolen huge amounts of grain, coal and metal products.Honest question hoping for honest knowledgeable answers.
Why did Russia invade Ukraine? What was their reasoning/justification for it? Seems it’s skipped over for the most part when I read how bad Russia is for invading. But they had to have some sort of motivation/justification in their/Putins mind?
I don’t trust left or right answers. No hard left or hard right links please. Looking for an unbiased, middle ground, realistic answer. Doesn’t mean the answer will actually justify the invasion, but what was there reasoning for starting a war?
Ukrainians are dying because of these idiots. This has to be one of the most shameful chapters in American history.Avdiivka may fall due to artillery shells shortage, says war veteran
I'm sure you all know that Mike Johnson, most likely on instructions from Trump, continues to sabotage aid to Ukraine. First he insisted that aid to Ukraine be combined with a border bill. Biden and senate did that. Then he said the two must be seperated. Now he wants to seperate Ukraine adi from Israel aid, hoping that will make it easier to defeat Ukraine aid.
https://english.nv.ua/nation/ratio-...ity-is-1-12-in-favor-of-ukraine-50389796.html
The situation is now considered critical. russians have gained lodgements both to the north and south of the city. In the south they are holed up in houses. If Ukraine had enough artillery shells, they could obliterate those houses. This city has been under fire for 10 years now and yet Ukrainians held on. What a shame it would be if it fell now because the West can't get any damned ammo to Ukraine.Avdiivka may fall due to artillery shells shortage, says war veteran
I'm sure you all know that Mike Johnson, most likely on instructions from Trump, continues to sabotage aid to Ukraine. First he insisted that aid to Ukraine be combined with a border bill. Biden and senate did that. Then he said the two must be seperated. Now he wants to seperate Ukraine adi from Israel aid, hoping that will make it easier to defeat Ukraine aid.
https://english.nv.ua/nation/ratio-...ity-is-1-12-in-favor-of-ukraine-50389796.html
Entire column of Russian armoured vehicles obliterated by drones
https://metro.co.uk/2024/02/02/entire-column-russian-armoured-vehicles-obliterated-drones-20216670/
damn! I wonder if that was a response for not allowing the anti putin candidate to run for President
Robot.There are enough votes in the House to pass Ukraine aid. But a bill can only come to the floor when the speaker brings it and the Weaker is afraid he will lose speakership because MAGA crazies oppose Ukraine aid. So a soldier on the front lines in Ukraine is running out of ammo because Marjorie Taylor Greene ranted on Fox about not wanting more money for Ukraine. Today's Republican party.
You mean like back in the 90s after Russia broke themselves on Afghanistan? With similar help from the US. When nobody had to worry about Russia?Our leaders have even openly admitted several times that this war was about weakening Russia and disposing of Putin. Please stop and think about how insanely stupid that is. If we destroy the central power of Russia, when they have so many nuclear weapons.
You mean like back in the 90s after Russia broke themselves on Afghanistan? With similar help from the US. When nobody had to worry about Russia?
Those were terrible times...
I can see why you'd be terrified of a return to a world without a Russian aggressor in which authoritarians know the world won't stand for their empire building..
What happened to Iraq when we created a power vaccum?
So.....because Napoleon and Hitler invaded Russia in past centuries, that makes "Europe" the aggressor in the Twenty First Century??? You need to quit reading MAGA's convenient alternative history bullshit and start actually doing your homework. All the factual historical information out there and you keep taking the lazy way out. And don't hand me the typical "the victors write the history" bullshit. The truth is always out there if you work hard enough to find it. But please give us an example of Europe invading Russia in the last 80 years.......How many bombs do you think Russia has dropped on foreign nations vs the US since then? Russia already has massive amounts of land. They idea that they want to take over Europe is absolutely ridiculous. It's Europe that's invaded Russia multiple times, not vice versa.
You're lapping up absolute hogwash meant to deceive people into supporting the conflict. Wisen up.
Just heard a new to me "theory" on why Putin wants to take control of more land to the west, even beyond Ukraine.
Today, Russia has about 4,000 miles of open borders. Much of their border is controlled by countries Russia considers hostle to their system and security.
It is beyond difficult for Russia to defend 4,000 miles of open borders. Most consider it impossible.
If Putin can take Ukraine, Poland, Romania, plus some other lands. Russia can use the seas, deserts, and mountains to reduce their open borders, usable by an army, to about 400 miles. Making it next to impossible for anyone to invade them.
So.....because Napoleon and Hitler invaded Russia in past centuries, that makes "Europe" the aggressor in the Twenty First Century??? You need to quit reading MAGA's convenient alternative history bullshit and start actually doing your homework. All the factual historical information out there and you keep taking the lazy way out. And don't hand me the typical "the victors write the history" bullshit. The truth is always out there if you work hard enough to find it. But please give us an example of Europe invading Russia in the last 80 years.......