HailBlazers
RipCity
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 20,166
- Likes
- 17,604
- Points
- 113
Be nice to have Barry instead of a memory care patient right now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I saw that, I believe the old man driving survived. There was video of a bunch of civilians helping to get him out.I don't want to post it in here because it's truly awful.... but there's video of a Russian armored vehicle intentionally swerving so they could run over a car coming from the opposite direction.
Memes and emojis as rebuttals. I will admit, these are slightly more convincing than the non-stories CNN and MSNBC were spinning to present their case.
Yeah, we were wonderin’ about that……………You guys remember that I live here right?
Yes, Putler is a very short and insecure man, which makes him dangerous for all humanity.Funny. When Putin posted those shirtless photos of himself, right gushed about how "manly" he is, unlike that wimp Obama. Then they actually met and President Obama towered over little Vlad.
If they had the guts........Chernobyl is what could pull NATO into this war. This would fall under article 5.
why is that?Chernobyl is what could pull NATO into this war. This would fall under article 5.
Yeah, I would think it'd still fall under article 4. Getting to article 5, an attack on them, is a stretch, but if radioactive gasses are released that could harm them, maybe you can see a case for it?why is that?
isn't chernobyl still a part of ukraine?
ah i see. sheesh.Yeah, I would think it'd still fall under article 4. Getting to article 5, an attack on them, is a stretch, but if radioactive gasses are released that could harm them, maybe you can see a case for it?
ex-president Poroshenko is also out there with a kalishnokov.
first thing that crossed my mind when the attack started.I am wondering if anyone else remembers that time we tried to impeach Trump for withholding military aid for Ukraine? Aid which was considered critical for keeping Russia at bay. The reason Trump did it was widely recognized as based on direct Russian propaganda Hunter Biden conspiracy in a smear campaign against Trump political opponents. All Trump wanted was for Ukraine to make an announcement of stating an investigation prior to the election, for which he didn't even care about the results of said investigation. Republicans ate it up and claimed that the Democrats had TDS, then blocked every attempt. Posters here claimed corruption of MSM and "Big Tech". I feel its important to point out how dangerously wrong all them were on this issue, especially since they will try to use the Trump impeachments as justification to impeach Biden if they take back the House and/or Senate. It should also be pointed out, especially with Trumps recent claims of Putins "Genius" invasion plans, that all the Russian asset conspiracy theories against Trump are turning out to be legitimate. And just for some extra salt to the wound, it also looks like Hilary Clinton was correct in here assertion that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset.
TLDR; Trump used Russian propaganda to deny Ukraine military aid in a direct attempt to benefit Russia's ability to invade Ukraine and try to secure his reelection.
first thing that crossed my mind when the attack started.
Yes but Russia took it yesterday and I have read that if radiation started to spread across Europe it would engage article 5.why is that?
isn't chernobyl still a part of ukraine?
Post it. War is ugly.I don't want to post it in here because it's truly awful.... but there's video of a Russian armored vehicle intentionally swerving so they could run over a car coming from the opposite direction.
the man survived.Post it. War is ugly.
Post it. War is ugly.
