- Joined
- Jul 15, 2007
- Messages
- 14,831
- Likes
- 8,308
- Points
- 113
I'll be pretty disappointed if we trade for Bridges. I just don't see him putting us in contender status.
Bam Adebayo on the other hand....
Bam Adebayo on the other hand....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A three-team trade between New York, Milwaukee, and Portland. Because Portland owns pieces of three consecutive Bucks picks from the trades that they’ve made together, including the Dame trade. ‘28, ‘29, ‘30 swaps and pieces of picks etc…. I’m like, so how does that work? Like what is the rumor,” Lowe said. “And I’ve heard a couple different versions of it. One of them had the Knicks getting both Giannis and Jrue Holiday, which would make sense because if the Knicks are trading multiple for one, they’re hurting their depth. And I’ve played with concepts where they get Giannis and Kuzma in a two-team trade with the Bucks.”
In that scenario, it seems like the Bucks will be getting back their picks from the Trail Blazers, which would be a win for them as they gain their own asset control.
“The Bucks get some money, lets say Jerami Grant, I cant remember what it was,” Lowe said. “And the rights to some or all of their picks back from the Blazers. Which is the golden chip for the Bucks in any Giannis trade. Can we regain our control of our draft assets? I was like what’s Portland getting, and in one version, they’re getting KAT, and another they’re getting KAT and Bridges. And I’m like what? Why? Like why are they surrendering these super valuable trade assets to add KAT $60 million contract to a .500 team?
The only way it remotely makes sense is if you move Bridges somewhere else, but even then... the picks are worth way more.![]()
Knicks rumors: Zach Lowe tries to make sense of Giannis Antetokounmpo three team trade rumor
Zach Lowe recently brought up an insane trade rumor he heard that involved the Bucks, Knicks, and Trail Blazers.clutchpoints.com
I'd rather keep Camara and Scoot, even if we don't give them any picks.If the Bucks want their picks, send Giannis to US not NY. Grant/Camara or Grant/Camara/Scoot plus picks for Giannis. I’d even do Grant/Shaedon for Giannis.
It's interesting. Yes in theory we make a lot of sense as the 3rd team but something good needs to come our way if we're giving up those picks. Might need a 4th team.![]()
Knicks rumors: Zach Lowe tries to make sense of Giannis Antetokounmpo three team trade rumor
Zach Lowe recently brought up an insane trade rumor he heard that involved the Bucks, Knicks, and Trail Blazers.clutchpoints.com
Also do Dame and Giannis even want to play together? I get the vibe they would prefer some time apart.If the Bucks want their picks, send Giannis to US not NY. Grant/Camara or Grant/Camara/Scoot plus picks for Giannis. I’d even do Grant/Shaedon for Giannis.
Bridges would be a really good fit. I think the days of giving up 3-4 1st rounders for a mid level star are over. If he only cost us one of those picks and one of our young guys I think you do the deal. He does everything well and just another great defender who can shoot the 3 and space the floorPicks are just gambles. Bridges is not only a great TEAM player (who showed he could be a scorer if needed in Brooklyn) he's an ironman. I mean, I love Matisse, but Bridges has NOT EVER MISSED A GAME (I think). He would fit the Blazers "culture" perfectly (and mean that we can dump Rupert to sign one of our 2-ways).
I don't think it will happen (most trades don't, and I can't see the Bucks wanting KAT) but I wouldn't be mad.
The assumption is that is part of a deal that nets the giannisThe Knicks gave up 5 1sts, a 2nd and a pick swap for Bridges.
I highly doubt they would trade him for one pick and a young player.
i disagree with your assessment that bridges is not an absolute upgrade over tou. at 29 he is only 4 years older than tou and will likely remain in his prime for years before any decline. he has proven himself as a 20ppg scorer over the course of 2 different seasons, played in 57playoff games including the ecf, wcf and nba finals. tou is better in guarding bigger players imho, but bridges is the better rounded and skilled player. that said if you are trading jrue and his experience and skill set not sure i pull the trigger. for KAT? heck no. straight up not worth the draft assets in 3 way giannis deal.I think the problem is that this team doesn't have huge holes in the starting lineup. Our bench needs work.
Pointguard - maybe
We have three really good wings in Shae/Deni/Tou. So we only would want an absolute upgrade and Bridges isn't an absolute upgrade. We don't need a center, so KAT makes no sense for us. Bridges is 29.
If you look at the NYK trade, the best player is Giannis and he's going to NY. The best assets are the Bucks picks and they're going to Milwaukee. So we're getting screwed.
So the only way this trade makes sense is if Bridges is going to another team that could use him right now. A team with young guys and assets. Someone like Oklahoma City or the Spurs.
The NBA sure seems watered down these days. Lots of old guys who aren't that good anymore. We are better off stashing the picks and just taking BPA.

Bridges was 20+ ppg scorer on a Nets team that had literally no other talent. He's currently averaging 15.6 ppg on the Knicks.i disagree with your assessment that bridges is not an absolute upgrade over tou. at 29 he is only 4 years older than tou and will likely remain in his prime for years before any decline. he has proven himself as a 20ppg scorer over the course of 2 different seasons, played in 57playoff games including the ecf, wcf and nba finals. tou is better in guarding bigger players imho, but bridges is the better rounded and skilled player. that said if you are trading jrue and his experience and skill set not sure i pull the trigger. for KAT? heck no. straight up not worth the draft assets in 3 way giannis deal.
Yeah, what do the Bucks get out of it though?The assumption is that is part of a deal that nets the giannis
Bridges was 20+ ppg scorer on a Nets team that had literally no other talent. He's currently averaging 15.6 ppg



My guess is that NYC will have to do more - I would imagine any Giannis trade going out will need something like KAT's salary going in.Yeah, what do the Bucks get out of it though?
I don't think we can run away with Bridges for just say Grant and a 1st. It would more likely be Grant and three or four 1sts.
I think our bench only needs work because of health. Once Scoot comes back, it's a bench of Scoot, Love, Sidy, Grant and Williams, that's pretty good in my opinion. The only thing I'd do at the tradeline is a small consolidation trade to free up a spot for Love/Sidy, or just release Rupert or Duop to free up a roster spot.I think the problem is that this team doesn't have huge holes in the starting lineup. Our bench needs work.
Yeah something like this could be worth doing.What if we move the Bucks' swaps in the deal, but replace with later Knicks swaps, when all their guys are old?
I don't know that the Knicks would deal Kat, Bridges and picks for Giannis. Maybe, but they obviously value Bridges highly in order to trade 5 1sts for him.My guess is that NYC will have to do more - I would imagine any Giannis trade going out will need something like KAT's salary going in.
Something like KAT + picks + filler for the Bucks (and NY will have to provide some of these incentives, they have swaps in 2026, 2030, 2032 that they can trade)
Giannis + MT + RW3 to NYK
Bridges to Portland
Of course it can be expanded to include other stuff from these teams. But that is a way to go about it.
Bucks get the three picks we own of theirs (and 2029 would be best of theirs/Ours/Boston) plus yes some young player(s). Sure they could take Grant but really they should just get whoever in the league has one of the worst contracts because they wouldn't be trying to win the next few years anyways.Yeah, what do the Bucks get out of it though?
I don't think we can run away with Bridges for just say Grant and a 1st. It would more likely be Grant and three or four 1sts.
Oh I think they would jump at that. They did value Bridges highly but that was a few years ago and he was on a Deni like cheap contract back then.I don't know that the Knicks would deal Kat, Bridges and picks for Giannis. Maybe, but they obviously value Bridges highly in order to trade 5 1sts for him.
I wouldn't give up that much for Bridges.Bucks get the three picks we own of theirs (and 2029 would be best of theirs/Ours/Boston) plus yes some young player(s). Sure they could take Grant but really they should just get whoever in the league has one of the worst contracts because they wouldn't be trying to win the next few years anyways.
One hickup could be the Bucks 2027 pick - its likely owned by the Hawks unless its top4 than the Pelicans get it. But really gives the Bucks no incentive to do a deal now or even in the summer.
not bad considering the shots brunson and KAT demand and on 58%efg and a PER above 16. tou is at 55% on less shots and PER south of 11Bridges was 20+ ppg scorer on a Nets team that had literally no other talent. He's currently averaging 15.6 ppg on the Knicks.
They don't have much in the way of picks. But they'd also be getting Jrue. So from them, KAT, Bridges, whatever swaps they might have for Giannis and Jrue seems like a great gamble to take. A real 2 year window around Brunson and Giannis, crazy good defense with Jrue, Giannis, Hart,, OG and Robinson to surround Brunson.I don't know that the Knicks would deal Kat, Bridges and picks for Giannis. Maybe, but they obviously value Bridges highly in order to trade 5 1sts for him.
