True. And everyone is raving about his feel. But can he become a go-to player for us in three years? Because I think we might be at a stage when his perceived value is > than what he will ever become for us.
My motivation for this thread is not because I think Zach is under-performing, moreso that his value might be as high as it will ever be.
Define go to player. I seriously doubt that Zach Collins will ever be the #1 option on a playoff team, or even the #2 option on a contender - on offense. Where he can add the most value is as a lock down defender who is also a solid #3 option on the offensive end.
To me, 20-year old Zach Collins is to defense what 20-year old Zach Randolph was to offense. As a 20-year old rookie, Zach C. showed impressive defensive instincts, the same way Zach Randolph came into the league with an innate natural ability to score the basketball.
As a 20-year old rookie, Zach Randolph barely played because he was a huge liability on defense (he also had a far better veteran playing ahead of him). It was during his second season that the 21-year old Randolph became a valuable scorer off the bench (averaging comparable minutes as a 21-year old second year player to what Collins averaged as a 20-year old rookie). It wasn't until the Dallas series at the end of his second season that Zach R. broke out and earned a starting role in his 3rd season at the age of 22.
As the season progressed, Collins earned a bigger role and more minutes, but it wasn't because of his scoring. It's pretty rare to throw a 20-year old rookie out there and not have them get totally abused on defense against established NBA players.
Before Randolph became a stater, he had to show his offensive ability more than negated his defensive liability. Collins is in a similar situation at a similar age, only it's his offense that needs to catch up with his defense. I think this is why the announcers and fans get overly excited when Collins makes a great move and actually makes the shot. They see that the potential is there to be a solid, reliable scorer, but the consistency is lacking. I may be underestimating him, but I don't see Zach Collins ever averaging 20 ppg in the NBA (well, unless he is the #1 option on a 22-win lottery team - be careful what you wish for), but if he can be a guy that averages 15 - 17 ppg with lock down defense at the 4-spot, I will be thrilled. I think that's his upside, and I'm totally fine with that.
BNM