Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
C.J for Klay Thompson? Highly doubtful but I'd do it in a New York minute!CJ could bring you a lot of top tier players in a trade...Lou Williams..Klay Thompson..Isiah Thomas...Booker...Derozan...his value isn't exactly peaking right now though...bad time to trade him and I don't see him traded until at least half his contract is up here
I was thinking about this as well but I just don't see why they would trade for him. Bradley is very good and they will probably be looking to extend him, they have young Luke Kennard waiting on the sidelines, and Harris will be hard to replace. I have had them as main trade partners for CJ but not so sure anymore.DET seems as a good trade target with players like Bradley and Tobias Harris
Maybe it's because I'm a Blazer Homer, but I generally prefer that we get the best player in a deal... which doesn't happen in any of these tradesSo, I've been wondering what C.J.'s perceived trade value is. Just how much do you think we could get back in a trade for him? Are deals like these too much in return for CJ or is this what his value is?
I think we're going to need to trade him at some point, and hope that we're able to get a borderline top 5 pick. If we got the 6th and 12th picks from one of these deals we could possible trade them up to 3 and land Doncic, Bagley, or Porter... That'd be the start of something.
So here's some deals. Which ones do you think accurately reflect CJ's trade value? Which one's would you pursue? Which ones would have a chance at happening?
PHI Gets: C.J. McCollum
POR Gets: J.J. Redick, 2018 LAL 1st (Top 5 Protected) or 2019 SAC 1st (Top 3 Protected)
CLE Gets: C.J. McCollum,
POR Gets: Jae Crowder, Iman Shumpert, Cedi Osman, BKN 1st
NYK Gets: C.J. McCollum
POR Gets: Tim Hardaway Jr., 2018 & 2020 NYK 1sts
CHA Gets: C.J. McCollum, Ed Davis, Al-Farouq Aminu
POR Gets: Jeremy Lamb, Malik Monk, Cody Zeller, Marvin Williams, 2018 CHA 1st
MIA Gets: C.J. McCollum, Ed Davis,
POR Gets: Justice Winslow, Kelly Olynyk, Wayne Ellington, Bam Adebeyo, Filler, 2018 MIA 1st (Conveyed If between 2-7), (Protection Backup 2019)
3rd Team Gets: C.J. McCollum
LAC Gets: 2020 POR 1st, Young pieces from 3rd team and POR
POR Gets: Blake Griffin
BKN Gets: Jonas Valancuinas
TOR Gets: C.J. McCollum
POR Gets: OG Anunoby, Norman Powell, Trevor Booker 2018 TOR 1st (via BKN), 2020 TOR 1st
ORL Gets: C.J. McCollum, Meyers Leonard
POR Gets: Evan Fournier, Bismack Biyombo, 2018 Right to Swap w/ ORL (Unprotected) - (If no swap, POR gets ORL 2019 1st)
UTAH Gets: C.J. McCollum
POR Gets: Alec Burks, Joe Johnson, Rodney Hood, 2018 UTA 1st
not sure why would you bring Drummond, hes better rebounder than Nurk, but thats all hes better atI was thinking about this as well but I just don't see why they would trade for him. Bradley is very good and they will probably be looking to extend him, they have young Luke Kennard waiting on the sidelines, and Harris will be hard to replace. I have had them as main trade partners for CJ but not so sure anymore.
I would do a deal centered around Drummond and Harris in a heartbeat, not sure what extras we would have to attach to even get them to speak with us though.
Unless they find a Giannis or Kawhi at pick 15-20, they won't make another 2nd round with this core.
Drummond is a significantly better finisher around the rim, is a shockingly effective passer (check the assist numbers), and the difference in rebounding is vast.not sure why would you bring Drummond, hes better rebounder than Nurk, but thats all hes better at

What took you so long?C.J for Klay Thompson? Highly doubtful but I'd do it in a New York minute!
Drummond is a significantly better finisher around the rim, is a shockingly effective passer (check the assist numbers), and the difference in rebounding is vast.
Better than asking "what does Drummond do better?" would be to ask "What does Nurkic do better?" According to the stats below, not much.
View attachment 17559
Problem is the iron has cooled off a bit on CJ and Harks Iron is now ice cold. Not sure we could swing that now.Last offseason I suggested the Blazers should have tried to trade Nurk, Moe and Vonleh for Drummond and Harris and was told how dumb that is. Seemed pretty obvious Drummond was going to have a bounce back year and Nurk was unlikely to live up to the expectations fans had created. Didn’t see Moe being a complete no show.
Drummond was definitely on the block and I bet Harris was too for the right price. Hindsight is always 20/20 but this team would be so much better if they could have pulled something like that off. Imo something of the same will need to be done with CJ. Strike while the irons hot.
Had to go back and find the thread you're referencing.Last offseason I suggested the Blazers should have tried to trade Nurk, Moe and Vonleh for Drummond and Harris and was told how dumb that is. Seemed pretty obvious Drummond was going to have a bounce back year and Nurk was unlikely to live up to the expectations fans had created. Didn’t see Moe being a complete no show.
Drummond was definitely on the block and I bet Harris was too for the right price. Hindsight is always 20/20 but this team would be so much better if they could have pulled something like that off. Imo something of the same will need to be done with CJ. Strike while the irons hot.
At the time, that Dell would've been horrible. Nurk was coming off a stretch where he was playing better than Drummond, Jackson didn't fit with our guards, and giving up Harkless, Vonleh, and two firsts for Harris was a reach.Had to go back and find the thread you're referencing.
http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/realistic-trade-ideas.316268/page-7#post-4196438
Have to wonder if your detractors therein (I won't name names) would want to reconsider their stances. You look pretty prescient in that thread.
Had to go back and find the thread you're referencing.
http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/realistic-trade-ideas.316268/page-7#post-4196438
Have to wonder if your detractors therein (I won't name names) would want to reconsider their stances. You look pretty prescient in that thread.
At the time, that Dell would've been horrible. Nurk was coming off a stretch where he was playing better than Drummond, Jackson didn't fit with our guards, and giving up Harkless, Vonleh, and two firsts for Harris was a reach.
Huh? We could easily get 4/5 seed and beat Minnesota in a playoff series.Unless they find a Giannis or Kawhi at pick 15-20, they won't make another 2nd round with this core.
Last offseason I suggested the Blazers should have tried to trade Nurk, Moe and Vonleh for Drummond and Harris and was told how dumb that is. Seemed pretty obvious Drummond was going to have a bounce back year and Nurk was unlikely to live up to the expectations fans had created. Didn’t see Moe being a complete no show.
Drummond was definitely on the block and I bet Harris was too for the right price. Hindsight is always 20/20 but this team would be so much better if they could have pulled something like that off. Imo something of the same will need to be done with CJ. Strike while the irons hot.
Drummond is a significantly better finisher around the rim, is a shockingly effective passer (check the assist numbers), and the difference in rebounding is vast.
Better than asking "what does Drummond do better?" would be to ask "What does Nurkic do better?" According to the stats below, not much.
View attachment 17559
Had to go back and find the thread you're referencing.
http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/realistic-trade-ideas.316268/page-7#post-4196438
Have to wonder if your detractors therein (I won't name names) would want to reconsider their stances. You look pretty prescient in that thread.
Mark it down everyone!!!
The first trade proposal for Nurkić!!!
And for sorry ass Drummond.... You gotta be kidding me...

At the time, that Dell would've been horrible. Nurk was coming off a stretch where he was playing better than Drummond, Jackson didn't fit with our guards, and giving up Harkless, Vonleh, and two firsts for Harris was a reach.
At the time, the two firsts may have made it bad value as proposed, but the basic premise was to trade potentially overvalued players for potentially undervalued ones. The fact that it seemed like bad value at the time doesn't change the fact that most of the arguments waged against it in July have proven to be incorrect.At the time, that Dell would've been horrible. Nurk was coming off a stretch where he was playing better than Drummond, Jackson didn't fit with our guards, and giving up Harkless, Vonleh, and two firsts for Harris was a reach.
how about posting some thoughts on why these god awful trades are a good idea
how about posting some thoughts on why these god awful trades are a good idea
We won't. You're blinded.Huh? We could easily get 4/5 seed and beat Minnesota in a playoff series.
Maybe we could wait until Nurk is as old as Gasol was his rookie year before we start saying that he's for sure not?I can’t find it in that thread but I think people thought it was so dumb because everyone assumed all three of those players were going to perform at the level they played at in 2016 when pretty much everyone on Detroit was obviously having a down year.
Plus there was that stupid cult following of Nurkic that had everyone thinking he was for sure the next Marc Gasol. I’d argue now that any of those three players would be no less than our third best player on the roster and that our team would probably be 3rd in the West. Just sayin...
I don't think they'd even accept CJ for Middleton straight up.I wonder if Milwaukee would bite on a CJ and filler for Middleton, Jabari, and a 1st. Jabari is obviously high risk high reward but reports are saying he could play right now but the Bucks are taking it slow.
Middleton could play the two and we might be able to use the 2 first rd picks and some of our scrap to trade for a real SF like Tobias Harris.
It will take something like this to get us out of the mediocrity.
I don't know that they would either but to be clear that doesn't mean CJ isn't the better player. Just not much of a incentive for them to mess with their chemistry.I don't think they'd even accept CJ for Middleton straight up.
I wouldn't if I were them.
I don't think they'd even accept CJ for Middleton straight up.
I wouldn't if I were them.
