BBert
Weasels Ripped My Flesh
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 26,741
- Likes
- 20,532
- Points
- 113
Maybe we'll get our starting PF back!!I can’t believe you left out out ace-in-the-hole who we’ve cleverly hid away all season - Keljin Blevins!!!

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe we'll get our starting PF back!!I can’t believe you left out out ace-in-the-hole who we’ve cleverly hid away all season - Keljin Blevins!!!

Green font?my entire post was facetious or sarcastic or in fun (all the same to me) as 98% of my other posts. Take your lame shit elsewhere, FAMS!
It's not youIs it me or is Dame the best player in this series
Uh-oh.....I AM an expert and because we have such a horrible coaching staff, we lose this series in 6.
Where do you see that Barton has been ruled out? I'm not arguing that he isn't, I just haven't seen anything that says he is. So if you have a link, that would be great.I pick Denver to win, but I find this comment kind of weird.
Denver is missing Murray and Barton (basically 33 points a game), and currently have only 4 players averaging double figures.
Portland has 6 players currently that average double figures (Dame, CJ, Powell, Anthony, Nurk and Kanter), but the top two on each team average about 52 points and 46 points (I rounded up for both). But that is going off of their seasonal averages as I suspect that Porter Jr upped his average since Murrary went down.
Yep, not taking into account the last 2 games (one was an easy win and the other the Nuggets didn't really try), Porter Jr is averaging 25 ppg in Murrays absence.
So, that genius scout is saying Portland relies too much on CJ and Dame (about 52) and isn't deep (not saying depth is the blazers strength mind you) but that the (checks math) 52 points a game Jokic and Porter Jr average is NOT too reliant?
The difference is also a whole 4 more shots a game "reliant" on CJ and Dame.
Are we sure that "scout" doesn't have "cub" in front of his title?
I thought "Trust me bro" was a link?Where do you see that Barton has been ruled out? I'm not arguing that he isn't, I just haven't seen anything that says he is. So if you have a link, that would be great.
Where do you see that Barton has been ruled out? I'm not arguing that he isn't, I just haven't seen anything that says he is. So if you have a link, that would be great.
I almost posted him up there just for you, my manI think you're forgetting someone...
...
Campazzo is like JJ Barea on steroids. And he's a big game player:

I think Dame can dominate a game more than Jokic... much is made about Jokic's passing ability--and it's tremendous--but Dame can handle the ball on literally every Blazers possession, and that means when he's hot he's better than Jokic, who's reliant on others getting him the ball.Is it me or is Dame the best player in this series
Green font?
Also: thanks for all the greetings, folks. It's been a minute and I feel like I'm in a time warp.![]()
I have aged a BIT. And my hair is long. I haven't cut it in about three years...In your picture/avatar, you don’t look a day older than the last time you posted.
Jokic often brings the ball up himself. He's not your traditional big man who just posts up and waits for the pass.I think Dame can dominate a game more than Jokic... much is made about Jokic's passing ability--and it's tremendous--but Dame can handle the ball on literally every Blazers possession, and that means when he's hot he's better than Jokic, who's reliant on others getting him the ball.
With that being said, Jokic has had an amazing, consistent season and I think he's more likely to be better this series.
If we listed all of the top players in the series, where do the rosters stack up? It seems like we have the better roster with Murray out.
No offense to MPJ, Gordon, and Barton, but those guys just don't scare me much over the course of a series.
- Jokic
- Dame
- CJ
- Nurkic
- Michael Porter
- Powell
- Aaron Gordon
- Covington
- Will Barton
- Kantner
- Carmelo
Should be a fun one...
My green font post was green font.I mean, I dunno here. The fact I had to explain my original post pretty much earned this particular response from me.
My green font post was green font.
FAMS!
I take offense to this thread. Im an expert at Blazing nugs but my opinion was not sought after?????
I don't think Denver is afraid to play us, but if they were........
They'd be Chicken Nuggets!
Bada-bing.
I don't think Denver is afraid to play us, but if they were........
They'd be Chicken Nuggets!
Bada-bing.
I will always choose Lillard over Jokic because of his clutch shot ability and range.If we listed all of the top players in the series, where do the rosters stack up? It seems like we have the better roster with Murray out.
No offense to MPJ, Gordon, and Barton, but those guys just don't scare me much over the course of a series.
- Jokic
- Dame
- CJ
- Nurkic
- Michael Porter
- Powell
- Aaron Gordon
- Covington
- Will Barton
- Kantner
- Carmelo
Should be a fun one...
I saw the headline of a Hollinger article on the Athletic. Seemed to indicate he picks Blazers over the Nuggets. Anybody care to post a synopsis?
Thanks.
:Nonetheless, the Blazers aren’t drawing dead in this matchup at the defensive end. Jusuf Nurkic is at least a competent foil for Jokic and should prevent the worst carnage. Enes Kanter? Not so much. The Blazers’ small guards won’t be exposed against Denver’s backcourt, and the lack of shooting aside from Porter should enable the Blazers to double Jokic more willingly.
Recent matchups point in the Blazers’ favor. Portland beat the tar out of Denver in the regular-season finale, a game the Nuggets were at least kinda sorta trying to win, and weeks earlier the Nuggets eked out a one-point win.
Overall, I don’t claim to have a great feel for this one; much like the series two years ago, it feels headed for a seventh game. Ultimately I have more faith in Portland’s offense and too many questions about who is suiting up in the backcourt for Denver.
Pick: Blazers in seven
