- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 2,920
- Likes
- 726
- Points
- 113
I think this game was mostly an opportunity for Stotts to experiment.
Playing the starters the entire 1st quarter than only the bench in the 2nd is not how you play to win games.
I think LMA looked very good, especially on defense.
I think the 2nd unit I listed (Blake, CJ, Barton, T-Rob, Kaman) could be very good once they develop chemistry.
I think DWright looked very good at PF late in the 3rd quarter - I think he can have a much bigger impact in this position, causing match-up problems for the opposition, instead of just being a mediocre 3.
I think Barton and CJ should learn how to play together and trust each other, once they do they'll be a very strong swingmen-combo.
I also think that Leonard and Crabbe are not NBA players and that it could be wise to even keep two of the non-guaranteed contract players and just let them go.
Playing the starters the entire 1st quarter than only the bench in the 2nd is not how you play to win games.
I think LMA looked very good, especially on defense.
I think the 2nd unit I listed (Blake, CJ, Barton, T-Rob, Kaman) could be very good once they develop chemistry.
I think DWright looked very good at PF late in the 3rd quarter - I think he can have a much bigger impact in this position, causing match-up problems for the opposition, instead of just being a mediocre 3.
I think Barton and CJ should learn how to play together and trust each other, once they do they'll be a very strong swingmen-combo.
I also think that Leonard and Crabbe are not NBA players and that it could be wise to even keep two of the non-guaranteed contract players and just let them go.
Last edited:
