Who is our third best player?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Third best player?

  • Plumlee

  • Crabbe

  • Henderson

  • Davis

  • Leonard

  • Aminu

  • Other?


Results are only viewable after voting.

illmatic99

formerly yuyuza1
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
57,763
Likes
56,275
Points
113
Feel like we have no clear 3rd best player. During our earlier stretch when we were killing, it coincided with Plums/Davis/Crabbe playing some of the best ball of their respective careers Argument coulda been made for a bunch of guys, but it seems like a lot of em have regressed back with no one having stepped up in a clear cut way. Still, we need a #3 when Dame and CJ are shut down on offense, or even a strong defender who can shut down opposing teams with his effort.
 
I'll come clean. I love CJ, and I am a HUGE (YOOGE) Ed Davis supporter. CJ is definitely our second biggest scorer. He's doing things only a 1B player would do on our team. He's obviously the second option in every way.

But, I don't think he's our second best player. I do think Ed Davis is the second best player on our team. He's being used in the best way, too. Look at his ORtg and DRtg of 128/104. Both are the best on the team. Does that mean I want him to have a green light to shoot jumpers? Of course not! He's best utilized as the garbage man for our less efficient lineups.

He's the only player on the team with both an Offensive Plus/Minus and Defensive Plus/Minus that's positive. When he's out there, he's providing a massive positive contributions to the team. Should he be starting for us? Probably not because he's undersized and best used in the 20-25 minute range, rather than the 30-35 minute range of playing time.

I love CJ; he's right where Dame was last year, and playing his heart out. I'm happy when he's playing, and don't mind his slumps because it's obvious he's learning the game. But for overall contribution to the team, Ed Davis is more positive than CJ.

The smoke bomb part was to lighten this up because it is such an unusual stance.
 
I'll come clean. I love CJ, and I am a HUGE (YOOGE) Ed Davis supporter. CJ is definitely our second biggest scorer. He's doing things only a 1B player would do on our team. He's obviously the second option in every way.

But, I don't think he's our second best player. I do think Ed Davis is the second best player on our team. He's being used in the best way, too. Look at his ORtg and DRtg of 128/104. Both are the best on the team. Does that mean I want him to have a green light to shoot jumpers? Of course not! He's best utilized as the garbage man for our less efficient lineups.

He's the only player on the team with both an Offensive Plus/Minus and Defensive Plus/Minus that's positive. When he's out there, he's providing a massive positive contributions to the team. Should he be starting for us? Probably not because he's undersized and best used in the 20-25 minute range, rather than the 30-35 minute range of playing time.

I love CJ; he's right where Dame was last year, and playing his heart out. I'm happy when he's playing, and don't mind his slumps because it's obvious he's learning the game. But for overall contribution to the team, Ed Davis is more positive than CJ.

The smoke bomb part was to lighten this up because it is such an unusual stance.

I love Ed's game, but when people are talking about the best players on a team they're usually thinking in terms of scoring and who can get their own shot. That's definitely CJ after Dame. Ed is one of those essential glue guys that every team needs. His rebounding is great, he's a solid defender, and he's a terrific garbage man when it comes to a put-back or finishing a play on an assist. However, he's definitely not someone that you can throw the ball in to and have him make something happen on his own.
 
I think it's Plums, and I think it would become obvious if his ball-handling opportunities were increased. His dribbling and passing skills are elite for a big man, and I'd really love to see us take greater advantage of them. Dame and CJ get iso opportunities, but I'd love to see a lot more of Mase breaking his man down off the dribble. It would give our offense a unique and unexpected look, IMO.
 
Our third best player is Meyers Leonard's shoulder who isn't afraid to take one for the team so we dont' have to watch him play against the spurs.
 
It's interesting how so many of us were duped into thinking Meyers would easily assume this role behind Dame and CJ before the season started. I even made a thread claiming this year's jump for Leonard would be like Aldridge's jump his second season.

He has 0 votes.

Damn.
 
I voted for Henderson. However after reading the comments I might have to agree that Ed's production as of late has been great. I wouldn't mind seeing him in the starting line up to see how that changes the flow. Plums has really good court vision and has great potential offensively especially if he could pick up a 10ft shot to open up the key. Defensively I think he is behind Ed in terms of development. I love both of them and would love to see them grow over the next season. Henderson and Crabbe both have their strengths/weaknesses, hendo is just more polished. I guess we just need more time to develop a number 3...or possibly trade for one.
 
Plumlee. McCollum is a one-dimensional scorer, and not a dependable one at that. Plumlee gets more minutes than Davis, so Plumlee ranks above Davis.

Aminu: The coaches are trying to make Aminu into another Batum, so Aminu is playing inefficiently. Aminu could be a Davis if so ordered.

In a trade, McCollum is the most valuable, but the question was, which one is most important to our winning. (Well, it implied that.)
 
Really surprised at the love for Henderson. Guy averages less than 20 mpg for the season. For our third best player, Terry certainly does not think much of him. Crabbe plays the same role as Gerald, and is sitting at 26 mpg for the season.
 
I hope the guy we sign will be our 2nd or first best.

Your not getting a better Player than Dame, so 2nd best is the best we will get. There are what, maybe 20 players in the league truly better and possibly more impactful. He is not replaceable, nor will we find anyone to come here that is bigger. With that said, I think we can bring in a #2 like a PA and CJ slide to the third best.

How many players do you think are out there that would bump Dame to the #2? Of those, how many are actually available?
 
Your not getting a better Player than Dame, so 2nd best is the best we will get. There are what, maybe 20 players in the league truly better and possibly more impactful. He is not replaceable, nor will we find anyone to come here that is bigger. With that said, I think we can bring in a #2 like a PA and CJ slide to the third best.

How many players do you think are out there that would bump Dame to the #2? Of those, how many are actually available?

I'm blanking on the initials PA.... Only one that comes to mind is Paul Allen. lol.
 
I'm blanking on the initials PA.... Only one that comes to mind is Paul Allen. lol.

errr umm PG I meant. Paul George. :)

And before anyone has a hair raise moment. Yes As of now, with Dames play and Georges injury, I think Dame is the better player.

Wit that Said, PA is a big boy. I think he might play the block pretty well. We should give him a shot! He would be the one guy we could get that would be better than Dame
 
Really surprised at the love for Henderson. Guy averages less than 20 mpg for the season. For our third best player, Terry certainly does not think much of him. Crabbe plays the same role as Gerald, and is sitting at 26 mpg for the season.
If the Blazers where more of a veteran ball club I doubt Henderson would be getting less minutes than Crabbe.

Let the cake bake!
 
depending on the game dynamic, it can be either Plum, Davis, Aminu, Crabbe or Henderson.

TBH, that's a great 'problem' to have
 
Ed Davis.

I think its very clear and not even a close debate. Ed provides excellent defense while being very efficient on offense. Second highest PER, yes above CJ, which is a stat normally more kind to higher usage offensive players. If our starting lineup wasn't so deprived of frontcourt scoring I'd want him to start.

Going forward Ed can play with a wide range of rosters. Bring in a stud center he can backup both front court spots. Bring in an offense forward he can start to provide needed defense. Regardless of who we bring in, regardless of their style, regardless of their position, Ed will be in the rotation. He's just as valuable as Tristian Thompson but one is signed for $80 million one for $20 million.

I honestly don't know if anyone else but DameCJ is a key rotational player on most contending teams. Plumlee, Hendo, Aminu? Perhaps they would be; but if there's another star in front of them they might be a little used 10th man. Yeah some guys on the current squad touch the ball more or play more minutes now while we are a .500 team. But to become a contending team who will help the team most at their current level of play? Easy answer is Easy Ed.

A player thats not a for certain starter being the teams 3rd best piece is a real concern though.
 
Last edited:
Ed Davis is probably my favorite player on the team - he gives everything, every night, but asks for no accolades. That being said, it's silly to compare Davis and CJ. Teams don't scheme either their offense or defense around Davis, they do around CJ.

As for 3rd best player, we don't really have one.
The good thing about our team is that we have a lot of very good players.
The bad thing about our team is that we have a lot of very good players.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top