OT Who is the most negative poster here

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Most negative S2 poster

  • Total voters
    37
But somehow I get punished by sly when he slows down my usage here!
 
BIG Q said:
As one of the OG's that migrated over from the previous site, I would say that there have been so many ridiculously bad posters here. It would be impossible to say who was the worst. There was even a female that got ran a few years back. Sure, look at the number of posts I have in 14 years. I've seen them come and go along with the other 2008 members. Every season there is a new yokel that flames out. I've preferred to watch for the most part. Started a family and that made it is easier to just catch good takes from TBPup, Ed O, Mediocre Man and the rest than to argue with youngsters that are still cutting their teeth. I have no desire to argue with key board warriors. I have been interested enough to post lately because we have a draft pick of consequence. First time since drafting Dame, but we were all crazy when we were debating Oden/Durant; honk once, honk twice. What I am getting at is that I have so many incredible stories and met so many cool people. Who is the most negative poster? Who cares? Everyone brings something to the board. The opposite of the most negative is the biggest homer. Probably 90% of this board are outright homers. Who cares. I've had the fortune of meeting the Mike's and hanging a time or two. Great people, over the top homers. Love them. Point being, you never know where your inspiration will come from. Listen, learn, engage, enjoy.
Click to expand...

:cheers: :clap:
 
Labinot41 said:
Lost interest for the Blazers after this tanking season tbh, but i hope that's gonna change when we Go back into win now. I'm not build for tanking
Click to expand...
I'm with you there....I bailed on the tanking this season too
 
Very disappointed I don't have more votes.

I've been called an algorithm of negativity.

LOL....do you have some algorithm that churns out the most negative response possible to any thought or idea any poster here has? Sure seems that way

I get it...the Blazers are in the most hopeless situation possible. It's worse than hopless. It's total doom and gloom....there's no light at the end of the tunnel, and if there is a light it's really a runaway train filled with more doom and gloom heading Portland's direction. Blazers suck
Click to expand...

http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/blazers-trade-the-7-pick-for.376675/page-4#post-5363232

I'm also not "rational"

How would you know?
You embellish half of what you write, and your trade proposal flamed out at a 55-1 score.
You jump to all conclusions before anything has been allowed to even work itself out, and will no doubt flip-flop your way through the upcoming season as Cronin's vision could very well play out.
"Rational" Blazer fan?
Not you.
Click to expand...

http://www.sportstwo.com/posts/5357340/

I thought with how terrible this Blazer roster is both immediately and in the future, with how I spread the word of our idiot GM trading 4 starters for Didi a backup and a mediocre pick, how we have no way to replace that talent, and how hopeless our roster is since its ranked among the worst in the western conference by ESPN I'd get more recognition. I certainly won't see my favorite team win anything soon. If I'd done well in this pole at least I could have a real chance at winning something.
 
riverman said:
I'm with you there....I bailed on the tanking this season too
Click to expand...

Yeah I don't want to watch games with a bunch of scrubs when the organization isn't even trying to win; and especially not even tanking, rebuilding, or constructing a roster well. Just complete utter failure.

Instead I come here and bitch about how stupid this franchise is. Maybe I should just walk away from the team completely, following the team doesn't seem to really provide any enjoyment in my life.

I can follow again when we have competent owners and management making good decisions.

If some righteous fans want to say I'm fair weather or whatever go say it, I could care less. I don't need to win a Blazers biggest fan award pissing match. I've been following this damn team passionately since 2nd grade in the 80's. Probably following it an absurdly unhealthy amount every decade if not every year.
 
WesleyMatthews said:
Yeah I don't want to watch games with a bunch of scrubs when the organization isn't even trying to win; and especially not even tanking, rebuilding, or constructing a roster well. Just complete utter failure.

Instead I come here and bitch about how stupid this franchise is. Maybe I should just walk away from the team completely, following the team doesn't seem to really provide any enjoyment in my life.

I can follow again when we have competent owners and management making good decisions.

If some righteous fans want to say I'm fair weather or whatever go say it, I could care less. I don't need to win a Blazers biggest fan award pissing match. I've been following this damn team passionately since 2nd grade in the 80's. Probably following it an absurdly unhealthy amount.
Click to expand...
choices ..they're important. You'retoo young to become a grumpy old dude yet...find some joy out there! There are two kinds of old folks...those who are happy and those who've practiced being unhappy...it's you're movie..you're the director producer and actor....make a good movie!
 
Hoopguru said:
agree...I actually think they should come up with some sort of penalty for tanking. It's gotten ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Totally Agreed. The should do something to reduce or eliminate the benefits of a team losing.

Idea #1 Change the lottery so all teams that haven't won a playoff series the last 5 years get the best odds. So being the worst team in the league or one and out playoff teams all have equal lottery/draft pick odds. No benefits to having tons of losses.Teams that won a title in the last 10 years all pick below above teams. Teams that won playoff series are slotted between these two groups based on series wins and weighted by conference finals/semis/1st round.

That still would get the best draft picks going to the teams that haven't won titles or many playoff series, so those fans have something to cheer for. But it doesn't provide this huge benefit to teams that lose.

Idea #2 There have been other proposals such as "The Wheel" where the draft order is rotated among the 30 teams. So each team picks in all 30 spots once over the next 30 years.

Idea #3 A third type of idea I like is giving teams that haven't won extra salary cap space or exemptions. Teams that recently won a title get none. Teams that haven't been to the playoffs the last decade get the most additional salary room.
 
WesleyMatthews said:
Totally Agreed. The should do something to reduce or eliminate the benefits of a team losing.

Idea #1 Change the lottery so all teams that haven't won a playoff series the last 5 years get the best odds. So being the worst team in the league or one and out playoff teams all have equal lottery/draft pick odds. No benefits to having tons of losses.Teams that won a title in the last 10 years all pick below above teams. Teams that won playoff series are slotted between these two groups based on series wins and weighted by conference finals/semis/1st round.

That still would get the best draft picks going to the teams that haven't won titles or many playoff series, so those fans have something to cheer for. But it doesn't provide this huge benefit to teams that lose.

Idea #2 There have been other proposals such as "The Wheel" where the draft order is rotated among the 30 teams. So each team picks in all 30 spots once over the next 30 years.

Idea #3 A third type of idea I like is giving teams that haven't won extra salary cap space or exemptions. Teams that recently won a title get none. Teams that haven't been to the playoffs the last decade get the most additional salary room.
Click to expand...
I want the lottery to be like "Deal or No Deal". Team rep with the worst record gets to choose between the top 5 briefcases. Then after they pick, add #6, mix them up, and let second worst record choose. Keep going like until all 14 have a briefcase, and then have them all line up and open them in sequence.

It would be great TV.
 
WesleyMatthews said:
Very disappointed I don't have more votes.

I've been called an algorithm of negativity.



http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/blazers-trade-the-7-pick-for.376675/page-4#post-5363232

I'm also not "rational"



http://www.sportstwo.com/posts/5357340/

I thought with how terrible this Blazer roster is both immediately and in the future, with how I spread the word of our idiot GM trading 4 starters for Didi a backup and a mediocre pick, how we have no way to replace that talent, and how hopeless our roster is since its ranked among the worst in the western conference by ESPN I'd get more recognition. I certainly won't see my favorite team win anything soon. If I'd done well in this pole at least I could have a real chance at winning something.
Click to expand...
Alright. You convinced me. You now have my vote.
 
WesleyMatthews said:
Very disappointed I don't have more votes.

I've been called an algorithm of negativity.



http://www.sportstwo.com/threads/blazers-trade-the-7-pick-for.376675/page-4#post-5363232

I'm also not "rational"



http://www.sportstwo.com/posts/5357340/

I thought with how terrible this Blazer roster is both immediately and in the future, with how I spread the word of our idiot GM trading 4 starters for Didi a backup and a mediocre pick, how we have no way to replace that talent, and how hopeless our roster is since its ranked among the worst in the western conference by ESPN I'd get more recognition. I certainly won't see my favorite team win anything soon. If I'd done well in this pole at least I could have a real chance at winning something.
Click to expand...

1. you started the poll and listed yourself as option #1.

2. everyone was going to put sly because most here want to fan and everyone here wants to give sly shit.

3. Mediocre man was going to win because, well, he’s mediocre at best and is a realist and downer, intelligent as he is, and has been with us longer than any of us care to acknowledge.

4. Going back to #1, nobody likes an attention whore.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top