Mediocre Man
Mr. SportsTwo
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
- Messages
- 44,954
- Likes
- 27,842
- Points
- 113
Who says no?
- Thread starter Mediocre Man
- Start date
Welcome to our community
Be a part of something great, join today!
Nikolokolus
There's always next year
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 30,704
- Likes
- 6,198
- Points
- 113
I say "looks terrible" because we end up with two players with substandard Player Efficiency Ratings and we "lose" the trade in terms of wins and losses.
I like it because I think Seraphin might be a depressed asset simply having a bad year and would be willing to gamble that he gets back on track like he was playing the year before -- buying low as it were.
I like it because I think Seraphin might be a depressed asset simply having a bad year and would be willing to gamble that he gets back on track like he was playing the year before -- buying low as it were.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 26,096
- Likes
- 9,073
- Points
- 113
I think both of those are ridiculously good for us, but...giterdun. Personally, I like the Maynor/PJ3 one, b/c I like Maynor as a backup PG for 16 mpg rather than seeing what happens with Brooks in the game and Batum/Price playing PG.
OKC has some assets....as does HOU.
Similar threads
