Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you guys seem to want to re-litigate last year's failures. I'm fine with that by the way
I just want to point out that what started this was Hoopguru just saying Olshey was high on Elleby and I just commented that Olshey was also high on Hezonja. HG said he didn't recall that so I simply posted some links with my usual snark
of course Olshey embellishes and spews bullshit. And of course other GM's do the same when talking about their own job perfomance. A GM who comes out during the off-season and says he put together a weak flawed roster won't have a job long, unless he's catfishing the rest of the league and his team wins it all
and yeah, Portland had injuries last year but when Olshey was praising the talent of that team it was known that Nurkic was going to miss months of the season. Thus Whiteside. And when Hood got injured, the Blazers were only 8-12 with Hood, so there were other issues than injuries. And some of us, including myself, were saying that if either Whiteside or Zach got hurt, Portland would be in trouble because there was nothing behind them on this supposed deep and talented roster.
and frankly Kj, offering what people say in this forum as a defense of what Olshey says doesn't make sense to me. Olshey is the only one of "us" that is making 3 million a year to evaluate talent and build a roster
c'mon man....an "elite" backup PG would play a lot more than 12 minutes. Simons averaged 21 minutes a game last season and he sucked
View attachment 35218
Most of his minutes were at SG. CJ mainly is the primary PG when Lillard is off the court. Even BBR.com lists Simons as a SG, because that’s what he is.
I’m wondering who would want to come to Portland as a true PG and play PG the 10-12 minutes Lillard a night is on the bench.
Simons played hardly any PG. Why would Stotts ever play an All-NBA PG in Lillard at SG for 9 minutes of his time on the court in favor of a lesser PG off the bench?
Somebody like Hill would take Simons minutes (and some of CJ's). He's a far better PG and a far better SG.
if Hill and CJ shared the floor, Hill would play as a PG as much, if not more, than CJ
all we really know is that when Portland has had scrubs as backup PG's they don't get much burn. But "elite" PG's (your term) are really good basketball players and Stotts would give one plenty of minutes
CJ is the back up PG at this stage and bringing in a 3rd string pg right now isn't really a priority as he would likely be sitting at the end of the bench or in street clothes.
Sad to me that guys like Harrison, Wanamaker and Okobo are all still sitting out there without a deal, and we're sitting here with an open roster spot, but pressed up against the tax line. The curse of Andrew Nicholson continues to rear its ugly head.
I'm not saying it is a priority, and I'm not talking about a "3rd string" PG; straw men all over the fucking place.....I'm just talking about what a good backup PG would do and be worth
and for chrissakes....the reason there is all this debate about a backup PG is 5 long years of CJ filling that role and lots of people judging that to be inadequate
Geesh. Relax and enjoy discussions. No reason to get all worked up over opinions. I have no problem CJ running the point for limited minutes as he is likely better than any pg we could afford to pick up.
I agree with you - there aren't 12-16 mpg to give away to a PG. However, I think we need a good backup PG for a different reason, which has to do with basic Threat/Answer theory.People need to write down the minutes ALL the guys on the roster would be getting now, then add in your favorite backup PG and show who you'd be taking those minutes from. Ant should not be in the rotation this year unless he's improved drastically. Adding 12-16 minutes means you're taking minutes away from Trent, Hood, and DJJ... all of which probably won't play as many minutes as they could/should.
People need to write down the minutes ALL the guys on the roster would be getting now, then add in your favorite backup PG and show who you'd be taking those minutes from. Ant should not be in the rotation this year unless he's improved drastically. Adding 12-16 minutes means you're taking minutes away from Trent, Hood, and DJJ... all of which probably won't play as many minutes as they could/should.
not sure what you're getting at...?
View attachment 35270
Simons averaged 21 minutes last season. CJ averaged 37; Hood averaged 30, when he played; Bazemore averaged 26 & Trent averaged 22
Simons sucks so there is a starting baseline of 20 minutes a game. CJ can give up 4 or 5. Dame could do with a couple fewer minutes a game. And there are probably 3-5 more minutes that could be 'squeezed' out of other players.
That gets a good backup PG up to the 25-30 minutes range. Now, I said good backup PG. I'm not talking about a Napier or a Frazier or any other 3rd string scrub that Portland could bring in on a minimum deal. I know many are talking about a guy like that but I think that's a mostly useless player
I am thinking along the lines of a George Hill or a Rondo. And yeah, that would have required the MLE deal and I know many are excited about Jones. I've been wanting a good backup PG for years. A veteran that knows how to run offense. But it ain't going to happen. However, it's kind of loopy to say there wouldn't be enough minutes available. There are plenty for a player the caliber of Hill or Rondo
not sure what you're getting at...?
View attachment 35270
Simons averaged 21 minutes last season. CJ averaged 37; Hood averaged 30, when he played; Bazemore averaged 26 & Trent averaged 22
Simons sucks so there is a starting baseline of 20 minutes a game. CJ can give up 4 or 5. Dame could do with a couple fewer minutes a game. And there are probably 3-5 more minutes that could be 'squeezed' out of other players.
That gets a good backup PG up to the 25-30 minutes range. Now, I said good backup PG. I'm not talking about a Napier or a Frazier or any other 3rd string scrub that Portland could bring in on a minimum deal. I know many are talking about a guy like that but I think that's a mostly useless player
I am thinking along the lines of a George Hill or a Rondo. And yeah, that would have required the MLE deal and I know many are excited about Jones. I've been wanting a good backup PG for years. A veteran that knows how to run offense. But it ain't going to happen. However, it's kind of loopy to say there wouldn't be enough minutes available. There are plenty for a player the caliber of Hill or Rondo
not sure what you're getting at...?
View attachment 35270
Simons averaged 21 minutes last season. CJ averaged 37; Hood averaged 30, when he played; Bazemore averaged 26 & Trent averaged 22
Simons sucks so there is a starting baseline of 20 minutes a game. CJ can give up 4 or 5. Dame could do with a couple fewer minutes a game. And there are probably 3-5 more minutes that could be 'squeezed' out of other players.
That gets a good backup PG up to the 25-30 minutes range. Now, I said good backup PG. I'm not talking about a Napier or a Frazier or any other 3rd string scrub that Portland could bring in on a minimum deal. I know many are talking about a guy like that but I think that's a mostly useless player
I am thinking along the lines of a George Hill or a Rondo. And yeah, that would have required the MLE deal and I know many are excited about Jones. I've been wanting a good backup PG for years. A veteran that knows how to run offense. But it ain't going to happen. However, it's kind of loopy to say there wouldn't be enough minutes available. There are plenty for a player the caliber of Hill or Rondo
...ineptly.We have players who play the backup PG position.
The second unit desperately needs someone that can distribute. The sad thing is that CJ could be really good at it, but we have so many guys that are looking for their own shot.
Melo
CJ
GTJ
Hood
Kanter
Who on that unit is going to initiate the offense? Who is going to drive and kick? That's a ton of talent but will there actually be some kind of offensive flow and structure? I hate when they bring the ball up, pass once and a shot goes up. Or even worse they don't even pass once.
