BBert
Weasels Ripped My Flesh
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 26,704
- Likes
- 20,455
- Points
- 113
I hope not. Daniels would not be my pick.no way Ivey falls past 5.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope not. Daniels would not be my pick.no way Ivey falls past 5.
I don't mean to piss on anyones parade, but I am not sure the Blazers want two rookies. I'm sure they would if the price is right. This draft is not so deep you take on bad salaries for the 13, 15 or 23. Those bad contracts are only valuable if they have team options or less guaranteed money the final year, IMO.
Hayward’s contract isn’t really that terrible of a contract, given that we would only have to hold onto it for one year. The year after, it is a $31m expiring contract.I don't mean to piss on anyones parade, but I am not sure the Blazers want two rookies. I'm sure they would if the price is right. This draft is not so deep you take on bad salaries for the 13, 15 or 23. Those bad contracts are only valuable if they have team options or less guaranteed money the final year, IMO.
Am I crazy for getting some Michael Carter Williams vibes from Daniels?
And each year people talk themselves into those guys by saying, well, his shot needs work, but you can fix that! And more often than not...they don't.Non shooting point guards taken in the lotto have not had a good showing in the last decade:
MCW
Killian Hayes
Frank Ntilikina
DSJ
Kris Dunn
Emmanuel Mudiay
Dante Exum
Elfrid Payton
All these players had questions about their shot and never figured it out.
The only two that had questionable shooting that have seemed to pan out are Ja Morant and LaMelo Ball.
And each year people talk themselves into those guys by saying, well, his shot needs work, but you can fix that! And more often than not...they don't.
We can absorb thybulle into a TPE.Got a notification from Bleacher Report saying Blazers want to make a straight up deal for Thybulle, Sixers want Eric Gordon as part of the deal. Probably means that Bledsoe will have to be coming out. Does this mean we keep the pick most likely?
If so, please let this be true. Thybulle or Nas will likely be the day 1 starter I would assume.
Ahh that’s right, I forget. Well regardless, we’d still have to send out Bledsoe. So with Thybulle fitting in the TPE, how much cap space are we actually left with? Will there be enough for more than just the MLE after re-signing Ant and Nurk?We can absorb thybulle into a TPE.
Not interested in thybulle. He’s 25 and still can’t shoot, which means he probably won’t ever.
great D, sure, but finding good defensive players that can’t shoot isn’t hard. Stanley joshson, Winslow, etc—these guys are cheap for a reason.
Well, if we re-signed him for 4 yrs/$40-45m, would you be more interested? Through three years, he’s already 2x All Defense. His shooting can only improve. The spacing and offense will be much better here than PHI. If it doesn’t cost much or at all, which looks to be the case, you’ve just found your on ball stopper for the next half decade for nothing. It cost you 2 1sts for Covington as a reminder.Not interested in thybulle. He’s 25 and still can’t shoot, which means he probably won’t ever.
great D, sure, but finding good defensive players that can’t shoot isn’t hard. Stanley joshson, Winslow, etc—these guys are cheap for a reason.
We never truly had cap space to begin with. We would had to have renounce Nurk, Simons, and hart to get $60mil. Once we make our picks, resign Nurk and simons. We are in a solid spot. A MLE signing will bring even greater depthAhh that’s right, I forget. Well regardless, we’d still have to send out Bledsoe. So with Thybulle fitting in the TPE, how much cap space are we actually left with? Will there be enough for more than just the MLE after re-signing Ant and Nurk?
If there is, I’m increasingly more excited for free agency and the rest of draft night.
LOL please don't remind me how much Roco cost us!Well, if we re-signed him for 4 yrs/$40-45m, would you be more interested? Through three years, he’s already 2x All Defense. His shooting can only improve. The spacing and offense will be much better here than PHI. If it doesn’t cost much or at all, which looks to be the case, you’ve just found your on ball stopper for the next half decade for nothing. It cost you 2 1sts for Covington as a reminder.
Nope.Am I crazy for getting some Michael Carter Williams vibes from Daniels?
They aren't All-NBA defenders though. Thybulle is.Not interested in thybulle. He’s 25 and still can’t shoot, which means he probably won’t ever.
great D, sure, but finding good defensive players that can’t shoot isn’t hard. Stanley joshson, Winslow, etc—these guys are cheap for a reason.
Not interested in thybulle. He’s 25 and still can’t shoot, which means he probably won’t ever.
great D, sure, but finding good defensive players that can’t shoot isn’t hard. Stanley joshson, Winslow, etc—these guys are cheap for a reason.
Totally disagree
You trade for him solely for his defense. A specialist.
He’s coming off a season where he was on the All-Defensive 2nd team.
totally agree if he can be gotten this cheap? what's the risk?Totally disagree
You trade for him solely for his defense. A specialist.
He’s coming off a season where he was on the All-Defensive 2nd team.
Nope.
Similar... I've been saying Evan Turner.
Sharpe @#7.
As someone who selected Gobert and Giannis in 2013, I see Sharpe as being a similar impact player that GMs will later regret not picking up when they had an opportunity.
I think Mathurin and Murray will be good to very good but not great. You want to draft great. It's no surprise to see a Sam Presti salivating over Ivey and Sharpe whereas inexperienced/lesser front offices are not. It would seem Masai is looking at Sharpe, as well, if he's asking for Portland's pick. Let's think logically here....if these two guys who have GREAT track records want Portland's pick, who do you think is the one who is going to get fleeced?
In other words, DO NOT trade the pick for OG. Speaking as someone who also spotted OG back in 2017 and had Portland selecting him at #20, OG will command money in two years and Portland will be without a future. Whereas, if Sharpe develops into a 20+ppg threat who can get his own shot up and command double teams? That's the future and that's a player who will be better than OG.
Thybulle for nothing? I know they want a 3rd team involved but defense for nothing... How do you say no?
man i posted this EXACT trade idea a few days agoGot a notification from Bleacher Report saying Blazers want to make a straight up deal for Thybulle, Sixers want Eric Gordon as part of the deal. Probably means that Bledsoe will have to be coming out. Does this mean we keep the pick most likely?
If so, please let this be true. Thybulle or Nas will likely be the day 1 starter I would assume.
Saying no would be… in-defense-able?
Hey, I got the first three right...I reckon:
Orlando: Banchero
OKC: Chet (to pair with Pokusevski to form the tallest, whitest and lightest frontcourt duo)
Houston: Smith (unless they want to have an all-guard lineup, in which case Ivey)
Sacto: Imma go with Sharpe
Detroit: Ivey (not sure a Cunningham-Ivey backcourt works long term but it would fun as hell finding out)
Indiana: Murray
Portland: should be Sochan but probably Mathurin or Duren or some shit.