Boob-No-More
Why you no hire big man coach?
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2008
- Messages
- 19,094
- Likes
- 22,763
- Points
- 113
I dont get why CJ doesnt have end of game plays drawn for him much more
Because he's not Kyle Lowry.
BNM
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dont get why CJ doesnt have end of game plays drawn for him much more
Not at all.
Just kinda refuting the idea that the two have some sorta synergistic relationship.
And the spotlight sharing thing. Dame's usg and FGAs trump CJ's at end of games consistently.
Only one a day? Why are you trying to limit us?!Hey we should all start a thread everyday with hypothetical trade scenarios involving CJ! Wouldn't that make the off season on here just the best? Keep it to one thread dorks!
Plug one whole and open up another? No thanksI love CJ, but if you can't sign what we are missing in FA, but can trade for him using CJ, and sign a Derozen, it has to at least be discussed.
And I take CJ over either 130 times out of 100.I'd take Ingram over Simmons 100 times out of 100.
Merge them all I say! Where are these mods...on vacation?
Looks like the Timbertrolls have hacked a bunch of accounts and started pointless Trade CJ threads.
No worries, SlyPokerDog is on the case!
Is Derozen + Millsap or Derozen + Monroe, worth it?
You can't look at it as a straight across trade. CJ brings it what we are missing, Derozen helps fill what CJ left. Its call a net gain.
And no, I'm not advocating trading CJ at all. But if the right circumstances come along, again, it needs to be at least discussed.
By the same token, I hope the Sixers take Ingram and the Lakers are unable to find a suitable trade partner and end up drafting Simmons. A Simmons/Derozan offseason will be big on "names", but short on shooting.Derozen has said wants a deal starting at $25 million per year and he wants to play for the Lakers. Let them overpay him.
BNM
I take it you would have preferred to keep all the trollish "would you trade CJ" threads that were cluttering up the board?This merge is yet another example of the minority voice having more say than the majority. Right up there with the Muslims that have Christmas shows changed to holiday shows.
COMPLETE BULLSHIT
I take it you would have preferred to keep all the trollish "would you trade CJ" threads that were cluttering up the board?
Actually, the reason the Warriors traded Ellis was two fold.
1. He was a ball stopper according to their scouts. The flow of the offense was affected. And they wanted him to give Curry more shots in the backcourt (which he resisted).
2. They had just drafted a very big SG by the name of Klay Thompson a few months before the deal and they were ready to turn the position over to him.
Of course defense also contributed to it (as it does to our two guys) but I don't see CJ being a ball-stopper that doesn't get Lillard involved and I don't see where Crabbe is ready to be our Klay Thompson.
So it is easy to throw out Curry and Ellis as the same situation as Dame and CJ but it just isn't when you look at it logically.
I hope Neil makes a move this season that just pisses fans right off
I don't like Govt getting too involved, and the same goes for the mods here
But why do you assume your opinion is the majority opinion? I don't see a rash of others complaining about this oppressive action.
BNM
I would have been in favor of a new subforum -- Trade CJ Subforum -- and move all of the threads to that forumI take it you would have preferred to keep all the trollish "would you trade CJ" threads that were cluttering up the board?
Oh I got reason.....I'll show you reason FAMS!Who da thunk HCP would ever be the voice of reason....????? An accurate post for a change....
I was joking. I couldn't care less
