Wow. Talk About Hate...

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

This is what I don't understand... why can't people just disagree with one another and leave it at that? Do they really think that berating some poor girl or hassling someone is going to change their beliefs? I think people have really lost sight of freedom of speech and freedom of religion. We are heading down a dark road when we start persecuting someone because they don't believe the same way we do.
 
He is totally heterosexual by the way.

{Poasted via palm pilot}
 
Look at those teenagers lined up by the movie theater! They must be organizing a sit in...so awesome...I might join them!

{Poasted via palm pilot}
 
This is what I don't understand... why can't people just disagree with one another and leave it at that? Do they really think that berating some poor girl or hassling someone is going to change their beliefs? I think people have really lost sight of freedom of speech and freedom of religion. We are heading down a dark road when we start persecuting someone because they don't believe the same way we do.

And I agree 100%.

I disagree with marriages not between a man & woman, but it's only my opinion and I harbor no ill will for those who disagree or want to marry a person of their same sex or an animal or a rock... But people have to use the hate card or race card when they think their way is the only way and all other people with opinions must be silenced.

It's part & parcel of what we're becoming as a nation.
 
And I agree 100%.

I disagree with marriages not between a man & woman, but it's only my opinion and I harbor no ill will for those who disagree or want to marry a person of their same sex or an animal or a rock... But people have to use the hate card or race card when they think their way is the only way and all other people with opinions must be silenced.

It's part & parcel of what we're becoming as a nation.

Why do you propgate hate speech on this board.

I call to ban this character!

{Poasted via palm pilot}
 
And I agree 100%.

I disagree with marriages not between a man & woman, but it's only my opinion and I harbor no ill will for those who disagree or want to marry a person of their same sex or an animal or a rock... But people have to use the hate card or race card when they think their way is the only way and all other people with opinions must be silenced.

It's part & parcel of what we're becoming as a nation.

Here's the thing BP, your personal beliefs on the matter of gay marriage (or mine for that matter) are irrelevant.

The issue is this: should the government regulate who can and cannot be married? If two people want to enter into a marriage, should the government be able to say yes or no?
 
The issue is this: should the government regulate who can and cannot be married? If two people want to enter into a marriage, should the government be able to say yes or no?

My opinion is "no". I think it's none of the government's business.
 
Huh?

Am I missing something or were you being witty and it went over my head? If so, I hate it when that happens.

just playing devil's advocate. basically what you think equates to "hateful thought" in the eyes of the liberal nutbags.
 
so the answer is yes.

Well, it's an interesting curve ball to the debate because, on the one hand, I think anyone should be able to spend their lives with whomever they want.

But... on the other hand, there's an intangible to the brother/sister thing that you wouldn't find with man/man or woman/woman. A gay couple cannot procreate together. They can get artificially inseminated if they're a woman, or they can adopt, but they can't go through the natural process of creating a child between a man and a woman.

A brother/sister relationship could make babies, and then you have to weigh the risks of the children having birth defects from an incestuous relationship. So.... then the question becomes; should the government prevent people from potentially having children with birth defects? And that opens a whole new can of worms that I don't want to go into.
 
Well, it's an interesting curve ball to the debate because, on the one hand, I think anyone should be able to spend their lives with whomever they want.

But... on the other hand, there's an intangible to the brother/sister thing that you wouldn't find with man/man or woman/woman. A gay couple cannot procreate together. They can get artificially inseminated if they're a woman, or they can adopt, but they can't go through the natural process of creating a child between a man and a woman.

A brother/sister relationship could make babies, and then you have to weigh the risks of the children having birth defects from an incestuous relationship. So.... then the question becomes; should the government prevent people from potentially having children with birth defects? And that opens a whole new can of worms that I don't want to go into.

So in looking at your stance, how do you feel about a person marring and bedding a sheep (like, say, an OSU football player) or a dog?
 
So in looking at your stance, how do you feel about a person marring and bedding a sheep (like, say, an OSU football player) or a dog?

The key to marriage is, two adults can willingly enter into a relationship with one another. There is consent. That's where the whole "I do" thing comes into play, and the contract.

How does an animal give consent?
 
Agreed!

I'm a complete hypocrite. Men together makes me want to vomit. Women together is erotic as hell.

I love hot, slutty, sexy, dirty whores (these ones are in the shower, so they're at least partially clean). Even better when they're all over each other.

Men together? Not my cup of tea. Though I do have a lot of gay friends, and we cool, as long as they don't try any funny business.
 
The key to marriage is, two adults can willingly enter into a relationship with one another. There is consent. That's where the whole "I do" thing comes into play, and the contract.

How does an animal give consent?

It's all in how much effort, if any, the animal makes to get away. If the animal takes it, I'd say there's consent, though there is a gray area. If the animal purs like a kitten and appears happy and healthy, I'd say there's no doubt consent is given.
 
we must preserve the sanctity of marriage!

michael-jackson-and-lisa-marie-presley-photos.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top