ABM
Happily Married In Music City, USA!
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2008
- Messages
- 31,865
- Likes
- 5,785
- Points
- 113
From: MVN - Bucks Diary
I was finishing Charley Rosen's fairly interesting article about the state of NBA's big men (he actually had an unusually fair, sort of correct assessment of Bucks C Andrew Bogut... and I think his theory about why so many big men don't play like big men is dead on) when I noticed a FoxSports.com poll asking which big man had a brighter future, Lakers C Andrew Bynum or Blazers C Greg Oden. No surprise, Bynum won by a landslide.
But why has the basketball public turned so quickly against Greg Oden, a center many considered a high impact player coming out of college? Is it because of his knees? Is it because he has not met their image of a dominant big man? What is it?
As I have chronicled in the past, Oden actually had a very productive rookie season. In fact, he was much more productive overall than Lakers C Andrew Bynum. Lets compare their statistics using each player's Marginal Win Score calculated according to the statistics provided by 82games.com on Bynum's "Production by Position" page and Oden's similar page. Before we get to overall MWS48 stats, though, lets break the metric down into the component parts that each player respectively dominates. First Marginal Effective Scoring, Bynum's strength, and then Marginal Rebounding, Oden's strength...................



