Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stream of Dozier's announcement if anybody is interested.
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/cedri...blog.thenewstribune.com/preps&medium=10303977
are they still showing it on espnu? they;re talking pac-12 right now, so timing wise it'd make sense.
At this point the Ducks need upgrades to the secondary and OL... Now's the time to find a few diamonds in the ruff!
is Coleman back to the secondary again? I thought he was projecting as a SAM
Looks like you're right.
http://web.nmsu.edu/~ogden/oregon/depth2011.htm
no worries. I thought I just missed something![]()
Looks like you're right.
http://web.nmsu.edu/~ogden/oregon/depth2011.htm
AdamJude_RG Adam Jude
Another Oregon target. RT @bcondotta Sark's latest "woof'' is for Shane Brostek, according to @Realdawg_com
Brostek to UW
I'm actually pretty high on our secondary. Last year there was a lot of growing pains, which was to be expected with all the youth. Only so much a DB can do with no push from the line. I think with the stellar D-Line class coming in, it will make our secondary look that much better. IMO.
OL is stacked for Oregon, so while I don't like losing a target to UW, I can understand it in terms of the PSA's perspective.
The "Woof!" thing by Sark on Twitter is just stupid, though. What a cheeseball.
Da_O
I agree with you that our secondary much like DAT were baptized under fire last year and for the most part did pretty well! They were kids and played against men with LSU and against arguably the best two receivers they'll see in college in USC, but the one part that still concerns me is height and strength. USC recievers wont get shorter and they simply outjumped our secondary in big plays. That's why a player with Shaq's size and speed is so desired. Now I KNOW there are alot of those type of secondary players all over Florida, Alabama and New Orleans who haven't been offered big time spots with the SEC monster teams that we could coach up here in Oregon and make into a lethal secondary with. For now our secondary will toe the line, but to win national championships our defense needs to do more than not to break, they need to intimidate and we're not there yet!
I was referring more to the games where they were torched through the air like USC.
in the USC game Oregon's top sack artist (Dion Jordan) was dinged early on and barely played. That was an understated but significant development
STOMP
DuckTerritory RT @JHopkins247: Couple late evening #Oregon developments (recruiting) http://t.co/HgwbhAzX via @247Sports #Ducks
Anyone know what's going down? Not sure it's much more than Julian Brooks, who also received an offer from UCLA.
Couple things.
1. Brooks got an offer, but also from UCLA.
2. Addison is wavering and his Dad is giving him second thoughts about going all the way to Eugene.
3. Brostek is off the board (obviously).
4. He has sources saying that Shaq may have committed to Washington but it's definitely not over for Oregon. He goes on to say that it's a long shot but you never know. The other poster Division1a also heard the same thing and says he has different sources than Justin.
5. Harper has gone quiet and there are apparently other factors at play, and his confidence level in him coming here are lower.
There's a chance we really don't come up with anybody new on signing day.
That is all.
Couple things.
1. Brooks got an offer, but also from UCLA.
2. Addison is wavering and his Dad is giving him second thoughts about going all the way to Eugene.
3. Brostek is off the board (obviously).
4. He has sources saying that Shaq may have committed to Washington but it's definitely not over for Oregon. He goes on to say that it's a long shot but you never know. The other poster Division1a also heard the same thing and says he has different sources than Justin.
5. Harper has gone quiet and there are apparently other factors at play, and his confidence level in him coming here are lower.
There's a chance we really don't come up with anybody new on signing day.
That is all.
Ducks were 40th in pass efficiency defense, and of the Top 50 in that category, gave up the most TD passes. Amount of plays must be factored into this, though, and amount of possession.
Being 4th in sacks is fantastic, but it is also a product of blitzing and leaving CBs on an island.
Plus, of the three teams ahead of Oregon in sacks, Texas aTm (51 sacks) was 67th in pass efficiency, Cincinnati (46 sacks) was 44th in pass efficiency, and Michigan (45 sacks) was 36th in pass efficiency.
Not sure what your sacks post had to do with anything, actually, regarding CB play and pass defense. Were you trying to prove a point? Amount of sacks doesn't really tell much about D-line play, unless you factor in other variables.