illmatic99
formerly yuyuza1
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 57,717
- Likes
- 56,227
- Points
- 113
Hot take: Steph is going to end up a top ten player of all time when it's all said and done.On his own planet...
BNM
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hot take: Steph is going to end up a top ten player of all time when it's all said and done.On his own planet...
BNM
Hot take: Steph is going to end up a top ten player of all time when it's all said and done.
Raw numbers wise and given the longevity and health, I say KD. But when you consider intangibles and impact to the game and team, it's Steph pretty easily. Steph's game resulted in a paradigm shift for the entire league. And the only reason why guys like Dame and Kemba don't get more pub for their games is because Steph did it first and did it better than anyone else can ever do. It's pretty analogous to MJ v Clyde.When all is said and done, who will be considered the better player, Steph or Durant? Why?
BNM
Burn it down in DC. Austin Rivers is the voice of reason. lol
https://www.washingtonpost.com/spor...?utm_source=reddit.com&utm_term=.849f218b73aeWhy the hell is Brooks not fired yet. He has CLEARLY lost that team.
I can understand being a weak team but freaking 2-9 when you have two all stars in John Wall and Bradley Beal then Otto Porter and that lineup. Something is going on over there
- He’s guaranteed $21 million from an organization that has soared past the luxury tax despite its roster holes.
- He heads a revamped staff with only one longtime assistant experienced in taking over head coaching duties.
- Most of all, he works for an owner who may be willing to press the eject button on his NHL coaches but practices the patience of a monk when it comes to making changes to his basketball operations.
When all is said and done, who will be considered the better player, Steph or Durant? Why?
So, this is you showing that Steph is leaps and bounds better than arguably the second-best shooter of all time?
If by "leaps and bounds better" you mean "takes a whole helluva lot more", then sure.So, this is you showing that Steph is leaps and bounds better than arguably the second-best shooter of all time?
We agree.
Volume matters. Nash himself has wondered how he would do if he just shot more.If by "leaps and bounds better" you mean "takes a whole helluva lot more", then sure.
If by "leaps and bounds better" you mean "takes a whole helluva lot more", then sure.
Dont forget the pistol!So, this is you showing that Steph is leaps and bounds better than arguably the second-best shooter of all time?
We agree.
Hot take: Steph is going to end up a top ten player of all time when it's all said and done.
Sure. And I wonder how Curry would do if he didn't play on an all-star team.Volume matters. Nash himself has wondered how he would do if he just shot more.
Sure. And I wonder how Curry would do if he didn't play on an all-star team.
My initial post was in response to the idea that we have never seen a player like Curry before. I think Curry is quite similar to Nash - a player we've seen before. Curry shoots more, Nash passes more. But there are more similarities than differences, IMO.
Never once in his career was Nash the primary scoring threat on his team. One year--when Amare was hurt--he was second on his team in FGA/game. Most years he was the 3rd or 4th option on offense. The difference between his role and Steph's is night and day.Sure. And I wonder how Curry would do if he didn't play on an all-star team.
My initial post was in response to the idea that we have never seen a player like Curry before. I think Curry is quite similar to Nash - a player we've seen before. Curry shoots more, Nash passes more. But there are more similarities than differences, IMO.
On his own planet...
BNM
Anyone have any idea what Jokic said that was worth getting fined for? I can't seem to find anything.
So, this is you showing that Steph is leaps and bounds better than arguably the second-best shooter of all time?
We agree.
OK, found more info.
Nobody. I said Nash was (arguably) 2nd best ever, and Steph is WAY better.Wait what?
Who was a better shooter than Curry?
If by "leaps and bounds better" you mean "takes a whole helluva lot more", then sure.
You know Pat Connaughton looks like Vanilla Ice in your picture.
TS% is a better stat IMOThe real killer to me is efg, steph on his carreer is at like 58%, dame is at basically 51, and westbrook is at 46% - Westbrook has never gone over 50%, where as Dames has gotten better every year except one.
You know Pat Connaughton looks like Vanilla Ice in your picture.
Lol I know gay people that don't give a shit about that....