It helps them target certain demographics based on race, gender, family history and other factors. Many of the genetic tests people do for their own ancestry research are fair game as well. Simply paying for them is consent to disclose your genetic data to the highest bidder.
bingo bango bongo ....Im thinking Gabbard will try and be the one to conciliate the two sides but not from a moderate standpoint necessarily, but being willing to preach the power of unity and compromise, give and take, with respect. She has a nice command about her too, which I think people could respect about her and possibly be open to her lead. Still early however and a whole lot could happen and even something unexpectedly.
Watch his interview with Joe Rogan. It's explained nicely. And he is nowhere near the first person to bring it up As he said, MLK JR was a proponent.
I'll take your word for it. I liked him when he was on the debate stage because he seemed reasonable. Didn't really investigate much tbh.
I thought so too, but I was actually intrigued when he layed it out in an interview. He made some pretty damn good points about it. One being innovation. Think about all the good ideas you’ve had in your life but didn’t have the time or capital to get them off the ground. If everyone had a just a little more breathing room financially we could all do our little side projects, make some cash with a little side business. Painting, woodworking, crochet, music, whatever the fuck people enjoy in their lives they should be able to do. How many brilliant ideas have we lost to 9-5 jobs and depression? It’s probably a shit ton.
