beast blazer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2018
- Messages
- 5,300
- Likes
- 3,249
- Points
- 113
c'mon man...I didn't just compare defensive numbers. I simply used a couple of gauges that use both types of metrics. Players spend as much time on defense as they do on offense so you can't ignore those numbers. Yes, rotations and roster construction matter, but using the sample sizes of career numbers goes a damn long way in dialing down the 'noise'
and lets be clear about something here. YOU were the one that opened the door to that particular discussion when you tried to justify Ant's shitty defense by comparing him to Harden, Dame, and Doncic (after arguing that Donovan Mitchell was only a "smidge" better than Ant). It's true...they are poor defenders, but they do much much more on the other end of the floor than Ant does.
By the way, Dame-Harden-Doncic have combined for 23 all-star games and 19 all-NBA selections. You might want to lower your target range for future Ant comparisons.
I'm saying those defensive stat may be able to tell you if someone should be categorized as a good/mediocre/poor defender, but precisely ranking them within those categories is a lot more dubious, because it's a low-fi stat.
I don't put much stock in all-star appearances. I think Ant is on the cusp of being one of the elite scorers in the league. You're allowed to suck on defense if you're a top scorer, and a team can afford to have at least 1 such player, just as a defensive specialist who can't score is ok if surrounded by enough offense.