bodyman5000 and 1
Lions, Tigers, Me, Bears
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2013
- Messages
- 19,582
- Likes
- 13,216
- Points
- 113
Yeah? Yuck.... the fuck just happened to this thread?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah? Yuck.... the fuck just happened to this thread?
I think any competent social worker would put a stop to this one.Don't interrupt. I'm adopting a son.
I'm voting for Diane Feinspy lolz.
Shhhhhh
Do you wear diapers?
Do you mind being spoon fed while wearing a bib at the kitchen table?
Do you fit in a high chair?
Do you like Gerbers?
Do you mind going to the Blazer games with daddy and sitting down low very near the center court line?
Do you mind not playing with your God damned smart phone at the dinner table?
Do you mind pushing daddy around in his wheel chair?
Do you mind sharing your Gerbers with daddy?
Are you potty trained?
nope.
depends on who is feeding me.
not for a long time now.
as long as you put enough cinnamon in it.
sold!
What phone?
sure thing!
you can have it all.
I've been peeing on my own for over 40 years now.

Yep. Voted D across the board and wrote my roommate in for the right leaning candidates that had no Dem counterpart and voted "YES" on I 1639 (now that I live in the 'Couve)Yes. Voting R across the board and "No" on I-1639.
Got some things to do today, so hopefully I can get my ballot turned in this afternoon.

Not K9?
barfo
Yep. Voted D across the board and wrote my roommate in for the right leaning candidates that had no Dem counterpart and voted "YES" on I 1639 (now that I live in the 'Couve)
![]()
Oh she's a K9.....
don't complain even if you vote, and it doesn't go your way!If you don't vote, don't complain afterwards if doesn't go your way.
It's part of socialism, you must be counted and part of the mass, regardless how you feel or what you do. lolI'm confused by the poll. To say that I'm not voting, I have to press the "Cast your vote" button.
barfo
She?
You said you were voting for KB? Kate Brown?
Psst...
There are two KBs running for Oregon Governor.
Yes, I have for about 6 months now. East Vancouver.You don't even live in Washington, do you?
oooooohhhh, yeah I'm dumb. Knute Bueler! Yeah, go Knute!
Yes, I have for about 6 months now. East Vancouver.

YOU'RE THE REASON WHY THIS HAPPENED!
![]()
Can you tell me what particular part of I-1639 passing would motivate such an action? The initiative seemed reasonable to me, a non gun owner albeitI've had plans to move in the next two years into a house. I'm moving to Idaho if I-1639 passes. Which it will, thanks to dumbasses up in Puget Sound.
Hope I still get a Blazer's broadcast out there....![]()
Can you tell me what particular part of I-1639 passing would motivate such an action? The initiative seemed reasonable to me, a non gun owner albeit
Maybe I'm simplifying it, and I'm not looking for an extended debate, but the basics are below. Seemed pretty reasonable to me. The only part I don't fully understand, being that I'm not a gun owner or advocate, was the "storage requirements."The entire thing. I don't have the bill in front of me at the moment, nor am I up for a long debate for it at the moment, but I've read and studied it, and much of it is questionable from a legal standpoint. It's not going to do anything other than be a massive burden to law-abiding, safe gun owners, and has the strong potential to turn many of them into criminals. It will NOT make us safe as a community or State. It's reactionary legislation to make Democrat politicians feel good about themselves, nothing more. And if they took the time to study firearms, firearm ownership, or talk to many in the firearms community, they would see this. But they won't, because they don't care.
Maybe I'm simplifying it, and I'm not looking for an extended debate, but the basics are below. Seemed pretty reasonable to me. The only part I don't fully understand, being that I'm not a gun owner or advocate, was the "storage requirements."
A yes vote supports the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.
A no vote opposes the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.
Maybe I'm simplifying it, and I'm not looking for an extended debate, but the basics are below. Seemed pretty reasonable to me. The only part I don't fully understand, being that I'm not a gun owner or advocate, was the "storage requirements."
A yes vote supports the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.
A no vote opposes the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.
Who is funding it means little to me. Every initiative is funded by someone that wants one thing or another. Thanks for the link.Here's a good place to start:
https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_...ship_and_Purchase_Requirements_Measure_(2018)
Keep an eye on who's funding the proposal. That should tell you all you need to know.
I've had plans to move in the next two years into a house. I'm moving to Idaho if I-1639 passes. Which it will, thanks to dumbasses up in Puget Sound.
Hope I still get a Blazer's broadcast out there....![]()
Who is funding it means little to me. Every initiative is funded by someone that wants one thing or another. Thanks for the link.
LolYou want an out-of-touch billionaire from some distant state funding a campaign against your Constitutional Rights?
Okay then.
Enjoy the link.
