OT Are you voting in this midterm election

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Are you voting?


  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .
Shhhhhh
Do you wear diapers?
Do you mind being spoon fed while wearing a bib at the kitchen table?
Do you fit in a high chair?
Do you like Gerbers?
Do you mind going to the Blazer games with daddy and sitting down low very near the center court line?
Do you mind not playing with your God damned smart phone at the dinner table?
Do you mind pushing daddy around in his wheel chair?
Do you mind sharing your Gerbers with daddy?
Are you potty trained?

nope.

depends on who is feeding me.

not for a long time now.

as long as you put enough cinnamon in it.

sold!


What phone?

sure thing!


you can have it all.


I've been peeing on my own for over 40 years now.

:lol:
 
Yes. Voting R across the board and "No" on I-1639.

Got some things to do today, so hopefully I can get my ballot turned in this afternoon.
 
This is a real election where electoral college bullshit is not counted. I am going to put my vote against a dishonest Senator and a Congressman that has been attached to his cushion 37 years. In fact, the Congressman lives in another State close to DC.
 
Yes. Voting R across the board and "No" on I-1639.

Got some things to do today, so hopefully I can get my ballot turned in this afternoon.
Yep. Voted D across the board and wrote my roommate in for the right leaning candidates that had no Dem counterpart and voted "YES" on I 1639 (now that I live in the 'Couve)

:)
 
I'm confused by the poll. To say that I'm not voting, I have to press the "Cast your vote" button.

barfo
It's part of socialism, you must be counted and part of the mass, regardless how you feel or what you do. lol
 
oooooohhhh, yeah I'm dumb. Knute Bueler! Yeah, go Knute!

YOU'RE THE REASON WHY THIS HAPPENED!

180320121037-kb-toys-store-780x439.jpg
 
Yes, I have for about 6 months now. East Vancouver.

I've had plans to move in the next two years into a house. I'm moving to Idaho if I-1639 passes. Which it will, thanks to dumbasses up in Puget Sound.

Hope I still get a Blazer's broadcast out there....:smiley-drzifige:
 
I've had plans to move in the next two years into a house. I'm moving to Idaho if I-1639 passes. Which it will, thanks to dumbasses up in Puget Sound.

Hope I still get a Blazer's broadcast out there....:smiley-drzifige:
Can you tell me what particular part of I-1639 passing would motivate such an action? The initiative seemed reasonable to me, a non gun owner albeit
 
Can you tell me what particular part of I-1639 passing would motivate such an action? The initiative seemed reasonable to me, a non gun owner albeit

The entire thing. I don't have the bill in front of me at the moment, nor am I up for a long debate for it at the moment, but I've read and studied it, and much of it is questionable from a legal standpoint. It's not going to do anything other than be a massive burden to law-abiding, safe gun owners, and has the strong potential to turn many of them into criminals. It will NOT make us safe as a community or State. It's reactionary legislation to make Democrat politicians feel good about themselves, nothing more. And if they took the time to study firearms, firearm ownership, or talk to many in the firearms community, they would see this. But they won't, because they don't care.
 
The entire thing. I don't have the bill in front of me at the moment, nor am I up for a long debate for it at the moment, but I've read and studied it, and much of it is questionable from a legal standpoint. It's not going to do anything other than be a massive burden to law-abiding, safe gun owners, and has the strong potential to turn many of them into criminals. It will NOT make us safe as a community or State. It's reactionary legislation to make Democrat politicians feel good about themselves, nothing more. And if they took the time to study firearms, firearm ownership, or talk to many in the firearms community, they would see this. But they won't, because they don't care.
Maybe I'm simplifying it, and I'm not looking for an extended debate, but the basics are below. Seemed pretty reasonable to me. The only part I don't fully understand, being that I'm not a gun owner or advocate, was the "storage requirements."

A yes vote supports the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.

A no vote opposes the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.
 
Maybe I'm simplifying it, and I'm not looking for an extended debate, but the basics are below. Seemed pretty reasonable to me. The only part I don't fully understand, being that I'm not a gun owner or advocate, was the "storage requirements."

A yes vote supports the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.

A no vote opposes the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.

You ARE simplifying it. My advice would be to go read the bill in its entirety. It's not as simple as gun control supporters are making it out to be.
 
Maybe I'm simplifying it, and I'm not looking for an extended debate, but the basics are below. Seemed pretty reasonable to me. The only part I don't fully understand, being that I'm not a gun owner or advocate, was the "storage requirements."

A yes vote supports the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.

A no vote opposes the ballot initiative to implement restrictions on the purchase and ownership of firearms including raising the minimum age to purchase a gun to 21, background checks, waiting periods, and storage requirements.

Here's a good place to start:

https://ballotpedia.org/Washington_...ship_and_Purchase_Requirements_Measure_(2018)

Keep an eye on who's funding the proposal. That should tell you all you need to know.
 
I've had plans to move in the next two years into a house. I'm moving to Idaho if I-1639 passes. Which it will, thanks to dumbasses up in Puget Sound.

Hope I still get a Blazer's broadcast out there....:smiley-drzifige:

What a great Bill. Hope it passes.
 
Who is funding it means little to me. Every initiative is funded by someone that wants one thing or another. Thanks for the link.

You want an out-of-touch billionaire from some distant state funding a campaign against your Constitutional Rights?

Okay then.

Enjoy the link.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top