Around The NBA

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Faried had 14-6 off the bench in 15 minutes.

Still mad we passed on him for Smith. Oh well.

That anger will go away....... remember all the people that were pissed we passed on sure-thing future hall of famer DuJuan Blair.
 
That anger will go away....... remember all the people that were pissed on sure-thing future hall of famer DuJuan Blair.

I would love to have Blair right now.

Where are Cunningham and Pendergraph?
 
It is us:

January 20th at Toronto
January 21st at Detroit
January 23rd Sacramento
January 24th Memphis
January 25th at Golden State

All teams we should beat.

5 games in 6 nights?! Geee-odd!! Fucking heinous.

Shit if we go 2-3 in that stretch I'll be pretty happy. 3-2 and I'll be ecstatic.
 
those other teams are gonna be beat too id say, but yeah, thats a rough stretch

but every team has a stretch like that? and im going to assume most of their stretches might be against tougher competition? it seems like we might actually have a lucky break in that department
 
5 games in 6 nights?! Geee-odd!! Fucking heinous.

Shit if we go 2-3 in that stretch I'll be pretty happy. 3-2 and I'll be ecstatic.

I think we have a 9 games in 12 day stretch........ that's crazy!
 
Reggie Evans to Clips for the vet min for 1 yr. heh, Quick had said his asking price was full MLE. crazy.
 
Reggie Evans to Clips for the vet min for 1 yr. heh, Quick had said his asking price was full MLE. crazy.

Damn I would've loved to get Evans at vet min. I kind of like that our guys are more then one trick ponies, but he was mighty good at that trick. Hmm think I would've preferred Evans, but still happy with our pickups. Great deal for the Clips, they needed big man depth.
 
5 games in 6 nights?! Geee-odd!! Fucking heinous.

Shit if we go 2-3 in that stretch I'll be pretty happy. 3-2 and I'll be ecstatic.

I pray Nate keeps LaMarcus' minutes limited, he should only be playing about 30mpg for those stretches. Yes it'll test our bench but its worth the risk. No point in riding our star into the ground just to get a better seed, only to have him gassed and unable to perform in the playoffs.
 
Damn I would've loved to get Evans at vet min. I kind of like that our guys are more then one trick ponies, but he was mighty good at that trick. Hmm think I would've preferred Evans, but still happy with our pickups. Great deal for the Clips, they needed big man depth.

Me too. The Clippers replaced Craig Smith with Reggie Evans, a better player for less money. Evans would have been tearing up our game last night with rebounds. I opposed getting Evans because I thought he'd cost more.
 
That anger will go away....... remember all the people that were pissed we passed on sure-thing future hall of famer DuJuan Blair.

I'm still pissed we passed on Blair not once, not twice, but three times. "Injury Concerns." "He has no knees." Etc.

Meanwhile, Blair's played in only 19 fewer games than Claver, Pendy and Cunningham combined. Putting up an 8/7 in less than 20 mpg behind Duncan (occasionally starting at C). 2nd-Team All-Rookie, and putting up the occasional 20/20. You know, what seemingly every 2nd-round draft pick does. Not like we needed big man talent, though, right? I mean, hell, we had Juwan Howard, Pendy, Dante, Joel, Marks, Barron, CJ...

Oh yeah, and he signed a 4/3.8M contract. He costs less than Earl Barron.
 
Reggie Evans to Clips for the vet min for 1 yr. heh, Quick had said his asking price was full MLE. crazy.

It's feast or famine in these signings, either guys get way overpaid in many cases and a few who are at the end of the signings get scraps. I think we did very well on a value for da money ledger.
 
Me too. The Clippers replaced Craig Smith with Reggie Evans, a better player for less money. Evans would have been tearing up our game last night with rebounds. I opposed getting Evans because I thought he'd cost more.

First, you're wrong about the less money part. Both players were signed for the minimum, but Evans has been in the league longer so gets a slightly higher salary. Not that it really matters the difference isn't that much.

Second, who is better is debatable. Evans rebounds better, but that's all he does better than Smith. Both are mediocre, at best, defensively, but Smith is infinitely better on offense. He's a much better scorer and a better passer. Evens is one of the worst offensive players in the league. You literally are playing 4 on 5 on offense when he's in the game. Smith, on the other hand is a very effective low post scorer. If you look at the advanced stats for both players, both career and recent past, other than the rebound percentages, Smith has a clear advantage. There is a reason that in spite of his excellent rebound percentages, Reggie Evans has a career PER of only 11.6 compared to Smith's career PER of 16.4. Smith also blows Evans away in WS/48 ( career = 0.113 vs. 0.081, 2010-11 = 0.120 vs. 0.078).

Finally, Smith is 3.5 years younger. And, the clincher for me is Evans has had major injuries the past two seasons that have limited him to 28 and 30 games. I'd much rather have the younger, healthy Smith than the old, injured Evans.

BNM
 
I know about Evans. As a Sonic fan I watched his surprise rookie exhibition season. The undrafted sensation made the team, kept improving, and lasted 3 years under McMillan, becoming a starter at the end of that period, as I abandoned the team and switched allegiance to the Blazers. He weighs a lot more now.

At the low sub forward spot, a specialist like Evans is better than a generalist like Craig Smith. The guy will be inserted into only certain situations, and not play across a spectrum of situations throughout the game. So it's better that he be great at 1 thing and lousy at the rest, than he be satisfactory at everything, more rounded like Smith.

At the 4th forward (after Aldridge, Wallace, Batum), Evans would have helped us more. If 2 forwards get injured and the 4th guy has to start, then Smith is better. But for the expected niche at 4th forward, Evans would contribute more in selective minutes.
 
At the low sub forward spot, a specialist like Evans is better than a generalist like Craig Smith. The guy will be inserted into only certain situations, and not play across a spectrum of situations throughout the game. So it's better that he be great at 1 thing and lousy at the rest, than he be satisfactory at everything, more rounded like Smith.

I disagree. The reason LaMarcus played so many minutes last season was lack of scoring on the second unit. With nobody else that could score, Nate often had to play Aldridge with the second unit. A guy like Smith, who can actually score, will let Nate play Aldridge fewer minutes, which will be huge with the compressed schedule. We need Aldridge rested and ready, not completely worn out, come play off time. Crawford, Batum and Smith will give the second unit a good combination of inside and perimeter scoring. With Evans, you wouldn't have any inside scoring on the second unit. It makes it a lot easier for defenses to clamp down on the perimeter when you don't have an iside scoring presence.

BNM
 
Yeah, I see what you're saying. The signing's been made, so it doesn't matter now, so let's review it at the end of the season. One will have probably gotten injured, deciding who was the better signing.
 
I pray Nate keeps LaMarcus' minutes limited, he should only be playing about 30mpg for those stretches. Yes it'll test our bench but its worth the risk. No point in riding our star into the ground just to get a better seed, only to have him gassed and unable to perform in the playoffs.

Actually I would prefer they take the approach of playing him normal minutes at the beginning of a brutal stretch trying to assure wins and then taper him toward the end. I'm not saying tank, but if a game gets out of hand, they should sit him and let him rest and let the reserves play out the string. I get the feeling tons of teams are going to be forced to take this approach.
 
Snoop Dogg @SnoopDogg
Pau gasol is soft as fucc we need to get his bitch ass on the 1st thing smoking hes a fuccn weanie. this is comn from laker fan #1...
 
Snoop Dogg @SnoopDogg
Fucc gasol hes a bitch we need mark gasol this ones a punk bitch. We need a pointguard bynum ballen his ass off!
 
Even with Bynum beasting the Lakers look like they're bound for the lotto.

Mettartest doesn't look like the same player. Definitely on the downside.

Pau Gasol's lateral quickness looks like it's on the Arvydas Sabonis tier.

No trade assets.

They owe Gasol and Bryant $142m until 2014.
 
Even with Bynum beasting the Lakers look like they're bound for the lotto.

Mettartest doesn't look like the same player. Definitely on the downside.

Pau Gasol's lateral quickness looks like it's on the Arvydas Sabonis tier.

No trade assets.

They owe Gasol and Bryant $142m until 2014.

I forsee the lottery for the L*kers and some magic ping pong balls for them.
 
Damn the Clippers are going to be fun to watch. Ree-dic-u-lus
 
:lol: We are not lottery bound. We are a 5-8 seed at best, though.
 
Steve Blake is the man when Kobe goes down. 20 points on 6 of 9 shooting. If they don't have Kobe or Bynum on Sunday, the Lakers are gonna be really fun to watch. If you hate the Lakers, that is.
 
Sounds like this is the year I may start watching their overhyped games! Which I've avoided for decades. My new 2nd most favorite team.

(evil heh heh here)
 
Snoop Dogg @SnoopDogg
Fucc gasol hes a bitch we need mark gasol this ones a punk bitch. We need a pointguard bynum ballen his ass off!

What a fucking idiot Snoop Dogg is. Pau Gasol is much better than Marc Gasol and Bynum until further notice.

In fact he was just as good as Kobe the past couple of years. This d-bag seems to forget how injury prone Bynum is and how Gasol stepped up in the two Finals.
 
Even with Bynum beasting the Lakers look like they're bound for the lotto.

Mettartest doesn't look like the same player. Definitely on the downside.

Pau Gasol's lateral quickness looks like it's on the Arvydas Sabonis tier.

No trade assets. They owe Gasol and Bryant $142m until 2014.

Especially if Bynum were to go down again. They could kiss any dream of getting Howard.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top