chuckd3534
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2013
- Messages
- 8,794
- Likes
- 63
- Points
- 48
Torts sucked, AV sucked, the next coach will suck. Point proven 94...
.
.Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.Point proven Chuck, you can't read. I said when their system gets figured out, neither of them could adjust or adapt. With Torts it was 100% defense and everyone should be willing to throw themselves in front of shots and be willing to get hurt and win games 1-0 or 2-1 with ugly goals. With AV it is the complete opposite. Try to outduel and out score teams (look at Vancouver not the Rangers) but don't crash the net and get gritty goals, spread them out and try to get pretty passing plays that eventually and hopefully lead to an open player scoring a goal. This team isn't built like that. We don't have A-the passers or B-the finishers for that. We are a team that has talent, but needs to crash the net, get gritty goals and win that way. AV just won't play that game and won't adjust to try it seems like.Torts sucked, AV sucked, the next coach will suck. Point proven 94....
We never suck enough to get a true game changer as when we do miss the playoffs we still just barely miss. We need to tank one season ala Pitt and get a high pick one year and build around that lolYeah what would we do without another decade of prospect updates which is so much more fun.
Yeah what would we do without another decade of prospect updates which is so much more fun.
Spoken like a dumb fuck who thinks you can buy and trade your way to a title. God you're stupid.
Edmontons got a bunch of young guys and they suck. You need a balance dump and this franchise can never get it right.Listen to 717. Sign and trade for old fucks. That is the way we will win a title.
We never suck enough to get a true game changer as when we do miss the playoffs we still just barely miss. We need to tank one season ala Pitt and get a high pick one year and build around that lol
As has been said before, for $8.5 million, Hank should be winning these games by himself, and they should not have as many huge contracts on defense. The cap issue is still a Torts system. Focused heavily on defense and not offense. The NHL isn't like that anymore. You need offense now and this team has none.The team's handling of the roster and salary cap has been brought up before. If we wanted to reverse engineer some actions think of the fact that they could've found a way to keep Stralman instead of going the Boyle and then the Yandle route. Too many big money long term contract will always be an issue especially for players that aren't exactly world beaters. Not to mention how many times are we now seeing that you don't need an $8.5 million goalie to win? I love Hank and he has done great things but that salary is just a killer.
As has been said before, for $8.5 million, Hank should be winning these games by himself, and they should not have as many huge contracts on defense. The cap issue is still a Torts system. Focused heavily on defense and not offense. The NHL isn't like that anymore. You need offense now and this team has none.
It's still a Torts cap team. I wouldn't be shocked though if Hank eventually pulls a Roy although his contract kind of prohibits that from happening.Yup, if you give your goalie that much money you can't and shouldn't have that much money tied up in your defense.
There nothing else you can do. This is on where you say "burn the tape" but in reality this is what this team is.Brassard is laughing on the bench. What the fuck. I love brass but what the fuck.
