Pinwheel1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
- Messages
- 23,309
- Likes
- 15,814
- Points
- 113
Insider says Matthews/Batum...
Meh
Who else? We would still be another 2-3 million off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Insider says Matthews/Batum...
Meh
Monta absolutely is a starting quality PG and would be arguably the best player on the Blazers. I just don't see why the W's might especially covet Batum when they've got Dorrell Wright coming off a very solid year and under contract for a couple more seasons, and other much more pressing needs in their front court.I don't have a problem with trading Batum, but we'd better be getting back a starting quality PG or big man for him.
Monta absolutely is a starting quality PG and would be arguably the best player on the Blazers. I just don't see why the W's might especially covet Batum when they've got Dorrell Wright coming off a very solid year and under contract for a couple more seasons, and other much more pressing needs in their front court.
Besides not having the pieces they'd be looking for, Portland is one of their closest geographical rivals and in the same conference...
STOMP
The Warriors average 105.1 points per 100 possessions when Ellis is on the floor.
They average 120.1 points per 100 possessions when he is not playing. That’s 15-point difference.
* The Warriors have a 50.4 effective FG% (counting three-pointers) when Ellis is in the game. They shoot up to 54.8% when he’s out.
Again, this is a rare, rare thing among big-minute players and certainly does not exist with any true elite player.
I'd said arguably. Pretty sure that if Aldridge and Ellis were teammates fans would be pyched about their exciting team and a debate ranking them would happen.I strongly disagree with this. The way LMA has developed it wouldn't even be close as to who the best player would be. Monta has yet to have a PER higher than 19 and his DRtg atrocious.
I strongly disagree with this. The way LMA has developed it wouldn't even be close as to who the best player would be. Monta has yet to have a PER higher than 19 and his DRtg atrocious.
Breaking down Monta's stats
I'd break the bank for Rajon Rondo (outside LMA) and that is the direction we should go, not Monta Ellis.
Monta absolutely is a starting quality PG and would be arguably the best player on the Blazers. I just don't see why the W's might especially covet Batum when they've got Dorrell Wright coming off a very solid year and under contract for a couple more seasons, and other much more pressing needs in their front court.
Besides not having the pieces they'd be looking for, Portland is one of their closest geographical rivals and in the same conference...
STOMP
I guess I think of Monta as a "PG" in name only. PG sized, but SG mentality. A bigger, not quite as quick, Iverson. Can you convince me otherwise?
how many players would you say have ever been as quick as Iverson was? I'd rate him the fastest/quickest player I've ever seen. Having watched Ellis quite a bit, I'd say he's as quick and athletic as anyone in the league today. He does have some of Iverson's relentless scorer's ability, but he's shown to be more willing to defer and set up others IMO... he's also a career 47% shooter to AI's career 42.5%
I'm not sure how I can convince someone else of my view that Ellis would be an effective lead/attack PG guard other then point to game film. I don't like the W's fit of their talents at all.. especially Ellis at SG. Rather then trying to convince you, how about I ask you to consider my view when you see him playing especially when Curry is out? I don't think the way that he plays on a limited and mismatched GSW's team is necessarily the way he'd play elsewhere with a different role and more talented teammates.
STOMP