Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Blazers scored the same 21 swish3 points as MIN in the Nov 4 game but were slightly higher % with 7 of 28 versus MIN 7 of 30. The low 25% swish3 shooting is possible to improve if we concentrate shooting with Dame, CJ, Meyers, Nik, Zach, Seth, and Chief. Caleb and Wade should not be attempting swish3s.
This MIN game showed the group that should constitute the bench rotation. I would play this group.
Evan PF
Seth SG
Zach PF
Nik SF
Meyers C
This group can has excellent swish3 shooting potential and plays well together. With encouraged spacing to allow drives to the basket and kick out passing to beyond the arc, Blazer swish3 scoring of 45+ points will be optimized. We need to find and feed the hot swish3 hand, make 15-18 swish3s, and score 130 points per game in future games and stay on course for 70% wins.
I, for one, am really impressed with the work you've put into the swish3 culture around here...commendable! You really do your swish3 research!Blazers beat the MIL Bucks shooting 17 of 43 (39.5%) vs 16 of 42 with 6 Blazers each scoring 2 or more swish3s!
This was an excellent game for CJ, Evan, and Nurk, and a solid team effort that included 23 assists and only 12 turnovers. Best shooting was from CJ 5 of 10 (and a game leading 40 points), and Chief and Meyers were 2 of 4, Dame was 3 of 7, Evan was 2 of 5, and Jake was 2 of 6. Zach was 1 of 3, Nurk and Seth were 0 of 1, and Nik was 0 of 2.
There was energetic defense, rebounding, and screening that achieved and protected the lead and held the Bucks to 9 points less than their average. This balanced and consistent play looks good enough to be a WC contender, or better.
Emphasis on empowered scoring with swish3s is a successful strategy, even against the top teams in the NBA. Let's keep this up.
15 free throws in the 1st quarter. 28 in the game (to their 20). We built our early lead via a parade of swish1's. Despite Dame's displeasure with the lack of calls later, it seems a stretch to suggest we had a disadvantage.The refs in this game were decidedly unfavorable, especially considering this is home court, with an unjustified technical called on Dame, lack of any call of the several fouls of Dame, and highly questionable fouls called on Nurk and Zach. Let's hope to at least not have a ref disadvantage on home court in the Celtics or any future games.
If only Draymond got T'd for similar stuff.Dame's technical foul was an error, because he only clapped his hands and said "that's a foul."
Dame was hit hard and his shot interfered with or even knocked to the floor without a single foul called.
This was in my view adversely unfair reffing that should not occur on home court. The Blazers should not have the zebras against them at home!
Why only 6? If he takes 50 swish 3s and makes 50% of them, that's 75 points. And when you add those points to our final score,we will probably score more than the other team who made less swish3s. Thus we will be victorious.Yes, Meyers needs to be shooting 6 swish3s per game, and continuing with more attempts if he makes 3+ of them. I would play Meyers, Zach, and Nik together for a multi-swish3 scoring threat that can beat the Rockets!
To be fair, Dame had been complaining all game, not saying he deserved the tech cause what he was doing wasnt much compared to what nba guys do on a regular basis, but it was probably attrition that got him more than what he did that instant.If only Draymond got T'd for similar stuff.
Dame's technical foul was an error, because he only clapped his hands and said "that's a foul."
Dame was hit hard and his shot interfered with or even knocked to the floor without a single foul called.
This was in my view adversely unfair reffing that should not occur on home court. The Blazers should not have the zebras against them at home!
Animus 2 swish3s at the end of the game were definitely clutch. If the blazers had missed all of their swish3s they'd have lost by 36.The Blazers are for real, beating the Celtics 100 to 94 with 42 points scored by swish3s (14 of 36) to match the Celtics 14 of 42. The Celtics shows by power of swish3 scoring in the 3rd quarter with good shooting but the Blazers kept it going with vital 3 point scoring for the win.
Best swish3 shooting was from Seth (3 of 4), Chief (3 of 7), Jake (2 of 2), and Meyers (2 of 3). Dame was 2 of 7, CJ was 1 of 6, Nik was 1 of 3, Zach was 0 of 1, and Evan was 0 of 3. Those 4th quarter swish3s by Chief were a major factor in the win.
The Blazer bench provided solid performance and helped get the big 2nd quarter lead. This was a great game for Nurk with both scoring and defense. He played with high energy that translates into wins.
This was a night where not turning the ball over everytime down the court wouldve been fantastic. Between TO’s and their defense they sucked. Sure they didnt shoot well, but shooting well usually comes with crisp offense.The Blazers decisively lost the swish3 contest tonight scoring only 24 (8 of 29) while the MIN TWolves scored 36 (12 of 28). This Nov 16 game was a game of turnovers and flawed Blazer coaching. In a game in which Nurk and Meyers were scoring well and should have been played together and fed more shots, the Blazers reverted to many shots by Dame and CJ. I would like to see Nurk and Meyers on the floor together with plays to have them shooting when Blazer scoring is falling behind. It made no sense to have Evan shooting swish3s, and Jake playing when Meyers could have been in, and Simmons played remarkably well when he was in.
Swish3 shooting was led by Meyers (2 of 2), Gary Trent (2 of 2), Zach (1 of 2), with Dame 1 of 7, CJ 1 of 4, Chief 1 of 5, Evan, Wade, and Nik each 0 of 1, and Jake and Simmons 0 of 2. This was a night in which recognizing and feeding the hot hand could have made a big difference. For the rest of the road trip, let's hope for better use of scoring talent that is hot. To win these games, the Blazers should be aiming to score 45 points by swish3s, which would have been enough to win again tonight.
No question Meyers played well again against the Twolves. He did get some time and Nurk played well though also. Stotts did play Meyers and Collins together for a while. But they couldn't close the gap.The Blazers decisively lost the swish3 contest tonight scoring only 24 (8 of 29) while the MIN TWolves scored 36 (12 of 28). This Nov 16 game was a game of turnovers and flawed Blazer coaching. In a game in which Nurk and Meyers were scoring well and should have been played together and fed more shots, the Blazers reverted to many shots by Dame and CJ. I would like to see Nurk and Meyers on the floor together with plays to have them shooting when Blazer scoring is falling behind. It made no sense to have Evan shooting swish3s, and Jake playing when Meyers could have been in, and Simmons played remarkably well when he was in.
Swish3 shooting was led by Meyers (2 of 2), Gary Trent (2 of 2), Zach (1 of 2), with Dame 1 of 7, CJ 1 of 4, Chief 1 of 5, Evan, Wade, and Nik each 0 of 1, and Jake and Simmons 0 of 2. This was a night in which recognizing and feeding the hot hand could have made a big difference. For the rest of the road trip, let's hope for better use of scoring talent that is hot. To win these games, the Blazers should be aiming to score 45 points by swish3s, which would have been enough to win again tonight.
Oh, you mean the other team started guarding him, thus taking away his swish3 opportunities? Weird.But with Meyers shooting 100% of swish3s, the Blazers did not keep feeding him. They left him alone on the arc and squandered shooting opportunities, like the close hook shot that Zach missed. Dame should have stopped after missing 3 consecutive swish3 attempts. Gary was also hot. What needs to change is getting to 8 swish3s each half by continuing the shooting from the hot hands.
What "plays" can get Meyers open? He can't shoot unless he's at a standstill, and his shot is so slow that defenders can easily go under screens and still be there to stop Meyers from shooting. Stick a guy on Meyers, and hes not getting open looks.No. I mean that I saw Meyers open at the arc and plays in which he could be open at the arc if they looked for him. Recognizing the NBA record swish3 percentage shooter being hot and using him as an offensive weapon in games like the MIN games should result in a win every time. When Dame and CJ and Chief and Jake are cold, the Blazers need to rely on Meyers, and with his active off ball movement, he can be open for at least 6 swish3s per game. And if he makes 3 or more, keep shooting. This is the Blazer who shot 76.9% in the playoffs! He will be open and know when to take those shots, but we need to be looking to him to score.
I bet you I can find someone who's shot 1 for 1, since you're not accounting for sample size.. and if Meyers is so good, why do you use a 5 game sample size from years ago to make him sound better?Hi BJ. Meyers does get open and make shots. And he spaces the floor, screens to get teammates open shots, and has good off ball movement that has him open at the arc. He has made many shots that show he is not easily defended. If you watch closely, he needs only about 3 feet of separation at the time of his shot, which is admittedly deliberate but also quite accurate.
Meyers NBA record is for percentage swish3 shooting (76.9%) in the playoffs, which in the "Is Meyers Leonard for real?" and other threads discussed and acknowledged.
In case you missed it, click on this:
http://bkref.com/tiny/fS0pn
