THE HCP
NorthEastPortland'sFinest
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 72,470
- Likes
- 61,489
- Points
- 113
that's if joel doesn't play, right?
Correct. If he gets traded to NOLA, he won't play next year!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that's if joel doesn't play, right?
Right but then you are suggesting that the Magic would go forward, planning to contend this year with Reddick as their starting SG. I am not so sure they would dig that idea. They still feel they are contenders. Unless you think Paul and Jameer Nelson make a good back court, which I doubt. If it had to work IMO, it would have to be a 3 way.
New Orleans got rid of Tyson Chandler for a reason before. I don't see why they bring him back now.
One difference: Joel's contract is 80% covered by insurance. That saves the Hornets 5 million bucks out of pocket (roughly)
You don't think they would offerRight but then you are suggesting that the Magic would go forward, planning to contend this year with Reddick as their starting SG. I am not so sure they would dig that idea. They still feel they are contenders. Unless you think Paul and Jameer Nelson make a good back court, which I doubt. If it had to work IMO, it would have to be a 3 way.
New Orleans got rid of Tyson Chandler for a reason before. I don't see why they bring him back now.
You don't think they would offer
Vince
Jameer
Gortat
Anderson
That was one of the deals their fans were offering.
Or something similar for PAUL?
What would Orlando rather have? Paul or Carter? Paul and Howard is a pretty devastating duo.
And Chandler, he's an expiring. That's all there is to it. If they want to cut salary....Chandler is expiring.
IF he doesn't play. Nate says he'll be back for training camp.
that's if joel doesn't play, right?
I don't see why NO would want that. They're trying to rebuild, and those are all bench pieces on a contending team besides Nelson, and they already have Collison.
he has to not play for 42 games I believe.
He's already passed that threshold.
He's already passed that threshold.
For the upcoming season?
For the upcoming season?
Smartass I mean next season.![]()
It can bridge more than a single season
Huh? I'm not being a smartass. Check it for yourself.
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q61
From what I can understand. They can't exclude Joel's contract from being insured anymore, but he still has to miss 41 games in order for the company to pay 80% of the guaranteed portion of the salary. Correct me if I'm wrong.There is a league-wide policy that insures the contracts of around 150 players each season. The five most expensive contracts for each team are included, and teams have the option of submitting additional names for coverage. The carrier has the right to exclude 14 contracts per season, such as when they consider a player with a very large remaining contract to be a medical risk. For example they excluded Luol Deng in 2008-09 because he had $71 million remaining and a history of back injuries. The list of excluded players changes each year, so a player who is not covered one season might be covered the following season.
If an insured player is disabled, then there is a 41 game waiting period, after which the insurance company will pay 80% of the guaranteed portion of the player's base salary. Once a player is covered, the carrier can't exclude the player for the remainder of his current contract.
If the player is traded, his new team receives the beneft -- for example, even though Cuttino Mobley's heart condition was discovered prior to his trade to the Knicks, the Knicks received the insurance payout.
From what I can understand. They can't exclude Joel's contract from being insured anymore, but he still has to miss 41 games in order for the company to pay 80% of the guaranteed portion of the salary. Correct me if I'm wrong.
thanks for the update. Except that in the past there have been big deals structured as separate trades. So, what is that all about?
He's already missed 52 ... the games he misses just get added to that total, it's not a per year thing.
Wait, where does it say that? And so he would have to miss 30 games if you're right, right?
![]()
How many games did Joel miss last season? The answer is 52. Insurance started paying 80% of his salary with 11 games left in the 2009-2010 season and they will continue to pay his salary until he returns to the court.
Okay, I misunderstood. So insurance would pay 80% of his salary for every game he misses right? It's not the full season?
It can bridge more than a single season
Huh? I'm not being a smartass. Check it for yourself.
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q61
EDIT: Joel was insured for the final 11 games of the season (he missed 52 in total) and will continue to be insured until he returns to the court.
Broussard just said that IF there is a trade, it will be to Por
-via TV
Yes. 80% of his salary prorated for the number of games he plays in, thus 80% of his per game salary. Once he returns to the court, the insurance goes away.
Broussard just said that IF there is a trade, it will be to Por
-via TV
Broussard just said that IF there is a trade, it will be to Por
-via TV
I just creamed myself even if I know it's not going to happen.