Blazers vs Spurs

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
magnifier661 said:
Lmao, you just admitted you weren't even a member back then bro. That could be sarcasm like "we don't even have what it takes to trade for him". If you weren't there, you can't think for him.
Click to expand...

Its pretty obviously sarcasm tbh. Half the damn posts in that thread are, and on the site in general for that matter...
 
Rz4k said:
Its pretty obviously sarcasm tbh. Half the damn posts in that thread are, and on the site in general for that matter...
Click to expand...

The sarcasm is based on the improbability of trading for the pick. That's pretty obvious... Don't go back peddling now.
 
Rz4k said:
Splitter put in work again with Duncan getting in on some action.

Still, I fully expect the Spurs to get destroyed in Game 3. Portland is due for a hot shooting night.
Click to expand...

Hey Robz, bend over. I'll show ya a Splitter.
 
magnifier661 said:
The sarcasm is based on the improbability of trading for the pick. That's pretty obvious... Don't go back peddling now.
Click to expand...

Exactly, and not the willingness to trade any of the Big 3. The only one they'd of considered trading for it was Parker, and in that scenario they'd of taken Durant due to already having Duncan.
 
Rz4k said:
Exactly, and not the willingness to trade any of the Big 3. The only one they'd of considered trading for it was Parker, and in that scenario they'd of taken Durant due to already having Duncan.
Click to expand...

Yes because everything on your board proves this? Sorry bro, the hindsight "I told you so" doesn't fly here.
 
hey mags, my condolences for living in Lancaster tbh.

Love,
Mugs.
 
magnifier661 said:
Yes because everything on your board proves this? Sorry bro, the hindsight "I told you so" doesn't fly here.
Click to expand...

They already had a C, no reason to draft another one. Then again, ST has been pretty awful at guessing the FO's moves outside a couple of instances (which to be fair were pretty amazing calls).
 
Rz4k said:
They already had a C, no reason to draft another one. Then again, ST has been pretty awful at guessing the FO's moves outside a couple of instances (which to be fair were pretty amazing calls).
Click to expand...

Uh huh?!?! Lol. I actually remembered those days. Spurs fans thinking Tim was over te hill, they were getting smacked down by the other dominant teams. Sorry bro, you provided no support to your claim, so just quit while you are behind. No offense...
 
Rz4k said:
They already had a C, no reason to draft another one. Then again, ST has been pretty awful at guessing the FO's moves outside a couple of instances (which to be fair were pretty amazing calls).
Click to expand...

Uh huh!!

131010_ayres_roster.jpg
 
magnifier661 said:
Uh huh?!?! Lol. I actually remembered those days. Spurs fans thinking Tim was over te hill, they were getting smacked down by the other dominant teams. Sorry bro, you provided no support to your claim, so just quit while you are behind. No offense...
Click to expand...

They kept trotting him out as a PF when he no longer had the mobility to pretend to be a PF. Once they finally put a legit mobile big next to him his production skyrocketed again.

As for your side you've provided zero proof for those comments not being sarcasm. Deniability is a two-way street my friend...
 
Btw mag, how's that claim of Pop trotting out Splitter to defend LA "being the biggest mistake of his career" looking tbh?
 
Rz4k said:
Btw mag, how's that claim of Pop trotting out Splitter to defend LA "being the biggest mistake of his career" looking tbh?
Click to expand...

"Ray Allen, from the corner...BANG!"

Get em, Robz.
 
Rz4k said:
They kept trotting him out as a PF when he no longer had the mobility to pretend to be a PF. Once they finally put a legit mobile big next to him his production skyrocketed again.

As for your side you've provided zero proof for those comments not being sarcasm. Deniability is a two-way street my friend...
Click to expand...

Sry bro, but that entire thread talked about how good he was gonna be and how you guys wished you could get him. I know you don't want to search other threads because they all supported oden.

Anyway hindsight is 20/20. Very easy to look back and say "told you so!"

Think about this... If Blazers come back and win the series, can I use "I told you so" on you? I bet you would discredit it
 
magnifier661 said:
Sry bro, but that entire thread talked about how good he was gonna be and how you guys wished you could get him. I know you don't want to search other threads because they all supported oden.

Anyway hindsight is 20/20. Very easy to look back and say "told you so!"

Think about this... If Blazers come back and win the series, can I use "I told you so" on you? I bet you would discredit it
Click to expand...

I'm too lazy to find any other threads without using google tbh, and at this point I don't care about the argument.

If you wanna make that prediction its cool, I'll give you credit. As long as you credit mine that Splitter has been giving LA fits imo.
 
Rz4k said:
I'm too lazy to find any other threads without using google tbh, and at this point I don't care about the argument.

If you wanna make that prediction its cool, I'll give you credit. As long as you credit mine that Splitter has been giving LA fits imo.
Click to expand...

Ah if you are too lazy then I would suggest you stfu. Otherwise the burden of proof is on you.
 
daaaamn, Robzy, deez nigs sure don't wanna acknowledge The Golden God tbh.
 
Btw, so far you are correct about Splitter being a factor on Aldridge. I don't mind admitting that. But as I said, "the series ain't over". Let's evaluate how he does the entire series
 
magnifier661 said:
Ah if you are too lazy then I would suggest you stfu. Otherwise the burden of proof is on you.
Click to expand...

If the argument means that much to you, I'll help you out...

1. Go to http://www.google.com
2. Enter "Spurstalk.com Greg Oden 2007" or something similar
3. Hit "Enter" or click on "Google Search", whatever floats your boat
4. ?????????????
5. PROFIT!
 
Rz4k said:
If the argument means that much to you, I'll help you out...

1. Go to http://www.google.com
2. Enter "Spurstalk.com Greg Oden 2007" or something similar
3. Hit "Enter" or click on "Google Search", whatever floats your boat
4. ?????????????
5. PROFIT!
Click to expand...
Is this just some way to direct me to an Oden dick pic?
 
Rz4k said:
If the argument means that much to you, I'll help you out...

1. Go to http://www.google.com
2. Enter "Spurstalk.com Greg Oden 2007" or something similar
3. Hit "Enter" or click on "Google Search", whatever floats your boat
4. ?????????????
5. PROFIT!
Click to expand...

Why? I already discredited your statement and it's on you to give proof to yours. I don't need to do your work.
 
Zybot said:
Is this just some way to direct me to an Oden dick pic?
Click to expand...

Some results did lead to discussion about his third leg, yes. Pictures may have been involved as well, I can't confirm or deny this.
 
Errors would probably be the first big off that thing they call a bench tbh....

i
 
magnifier661 said:
Why? I already discredited your statement and it's on you to give proof to yours. I don't need to do your work.
Click to expand...

It just seems as if you really care about this topic so I figured I'd help aid your quest for knowledge.
 
Rz4k said:
It just seems as if you really care about this topic so I figured I'd help aid your quest for knowledge.
Click to expand...

Nah I don't care, just exposing you... We can move on now that we know you weren't notradamus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top