Game Thread 2025-26 GAME #36 - BLAZERS @ SPURS - JANUARY 3, 2026 - FRIDAY - 5:00 PM - KUNP - BLAZERVISION

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I'm glad we got that win but it wasn't smart for tonight and it definitely wasn't a smart decision for the futrue to sit Shaedon.
 
wow...that was a tough win but I'll take it! We left a big lead at the free throw line
 
Shae punched his own ticket to the bench coughing it up to nobody in the fourth
We got the win so that's great. Maybe Shaedon was sick or something.

As far as how Love looked in clutch time he was not good at all. He was out of position on defense and 0 for 2 from three and 1 for 4 from the charity striipe. Again though it's a win and I don't know what might have kept Shaedon on the bench.
 
You can’t really blame a guy on a two way deal for not being clutch. That said I am glad Love got the chance and he probably will work all the harder. Shae musta been sick
 
BTW, one of the moments of the night for me was watching a teenager in the front row trying to get the Coyote to shoot him with the shirt gun from point blank range during a break in the action in the 4Q. Was hoping the Coyote would bite on that.
 
You can’t really blame a guy on a two way deal for not being clutch. That said I am glad Love got the chance and he probably will work all the harder. Shae musta been sick
I hope Shae feels better if he was sick, if he wasn't that's kind of a big deal.

I wasn't trying to rip Love for his play, he's getting a lot better and that should be cheered for. Just didn't like Shaedon sitting.

Unfortunately we don't have one reporter in our press pool who thought it was worth asking why our second leading scorer and starter sat for the last 7 minutes of the game.
 
I hope Shae feels better if he was sick, if he wasn't that's kind of a big deal.

I wasn't trying to rip Love for his play, he's getting a lot better and that should be cheered for. Just didn't like Shaedon sitting.

Unfortunately we don't have one reporter in our press pool who thought it was worth asking why our second leading scorer and starter sat for the last 7 minutes of the game.
Because he had scored six points and had four turnovers in 28 minutes. It’s not rocket science. In THIS GAME he was our fifth leading scorer and had just thrown a pass to Kevin Calabro.
 
Shaedon got benched for having a bad game
I hope you're wrong but we'll never know because the press pool didn't ask Tiago.

If Tiago did bench Shae for having a bad game, which Shaedon did have, it was a short sighted decision. Shaedon needs to know that the coach has his back and I don't think he would have played any worse than Love did since Deni came back in with Toumani when Shae sat. If Shaedon was having a bad game for physical reasons that the coach knew about then it is what it is.
 
Because he had scored six points and had four turnovers in 28 minutes. It’s not rocket science. In THIS GAME he was our fifth leading scorer and had just thrown a pass to Kevin Calabro.
I would have loved to hear that from Tiago. If that was his reasoning I think it's a big mistake.
 
I hope you're wrong but we'll never know because the press pool didn't ask Tiago.

If Tiago did bench Shae for having a bad game, which Shaedon did have, it was a short sighted decision. Shaedon needs to know that the coach has his back and I don't think he would have played any worse than Love did since Deni came back in with Toumani when Shae sat. If Shaedon was having a bad game for physical reasons that the coach knew about then it is what it is.
If being benched for one game because he was stinking up the court was enough to break Shaedon’s psyche, he should be traded immediately, because he would not be resilient enough to play in the NBA.
 
The team is coming up on having to make a decision on Love and Sidy. Both have played in over 29 games and have a max of 50 games available for them (they don't have to, iirc, play in a game for it to count. If they're available, it counts towards the 50 game total).

They'll need to convert those contracts to guaranteed, or assign them to the g-league for the rest of the year.

I think, barring a trade, their two players who might be unloaded are Rupert and Murray.

I don't know if the league has some kind of lee-way due to injuries or not.

(I'm sure this was brought up already, and maybe even in this thread. So if it was, sorry for bringing it up again)
 
The team is coming up on having to make a decision on Love and Sidy. Both have played in over 29 games and have a max of 50 games available for them (they don't have to, iirc, play in a game for it to count. If they're available, it counts towards the 50 game total).

They'll need to convert those contracts to guaranteed, or assign them to the g-league for the rest of the year.

I think, barring a trade, their two players who might be unloaded are Rupert and Murray.

I don't know if the league has some kind of lee-way due to injuries or not.

(I'm sure this was brought up already, and maybe even in this thread. So if it was, sorry for bringing it up again)
no way am I dropping Murray when Javonte Cooke and Duop Reath are still on our roster.
 
If being benched for one game because he was stinking up the court was enough to break Shaedon’s psyche, he should be traded immediately, because he would not be resilient enough to play in the NBA.
I could see pulling Shaedon for a few minutes but benching him seems rash. I'm not worried about it breaking his psyche. I just think it's good for the best players on the team to know that their coach has their back and I think he would have given us a better chance at the win... that we got anyway than Love in that situation.

This isn't high school basketball. NBA starters rarely if ever get benched because they're having an off night. The reason is that if you believe a guy is good enough to start and finish most games then you should believe he's the best player to have in on any given play. You should believe that the guy can play his way through the bad stretch.

Again, maybe he was sick or has something else going on physically. I just would have liked to hear Tiago's reason and I think one of the reporters asking him questions after the game should have inquired about it.
 
The team is coming up on having to make a decision on Love and Sidy. Both have played in over 29 games and have a max of 50 games available for them (they don't have to, iirc, play in a game for it to count. If they're available, it counts towards the 50 game total).

They'll need to convert those contracts to guaranteed, or assign them to the g-league for the rest of the year.

I think, barring a trade, their two players who might be unloaded are Rupert and Murray.

I don't know if the league has some kind of lee-way due to injuries or not.

(I'm sure this was brought up already, and maybe even in this thread. So if it was, sorry for bringing it up again)

There is no exception to allow them to play longer on their two way contract. A team does have a hardship exception in the case of injury and can sign a free agent or convert a two way player to a standard contract that does not affect the salary cap.
 
The team is coming up on having to make a decision on Love and Sidy. Both have played in over 29 games and have a max of 50 games available for them (they don't have to, iirc, play in a game for it to count. If they're available, it counts towards the 50 game total).

They'll need to convert those contracts to guaranteed, or assign them to the g-league for the rest of the year.

I think, barring a trade, their two players who might be unloaded are Rupert and Murray.

I don't know if the league has some kind of lee-way due to injuries or not.

(I'm sure this was brought up already, and maybe even in this thread. So if it was, sorry for bringing it up again)
I think before we cut both of those guys we would make a trade that opened up at least one if not both roster spots necessary to play Love and Sidy more games.

I also think that Scoot and Jrue returning soon with Blake returning late in the season might make it so Love doesn't need to play.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top