- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 126,463
- Likes
- 146,911
- Points
- 115
As long as he plays better defense than Dame did we shouldn't care about the rest of his game, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depends on his roleAs long as he plays better defense than Dame did we shouldn't care about the rest of his game, right?
Agree with the comments that I was much more hopeful of Telfair in his second season than I am with Scoot now. Telfair was traded after his second year for the pick that became Roy. I doubt Scoot will have that value after this season.
At this point I think we can mark down in pencil that Scoot was a fail at #3, and is likely a bust. Sure there are some outliner cases where a player turns it around, but at this point the odds are against that happening. I'm not sure Scoot has more potential than Camara or Rupert. Yes Scoot still has some value and upside just like those other two do as well, but its clearly a fail from what we were hoping for at #3.
I’d take a Hall of Fame career from Scoot.Its funny the announcers said how much his skillset compares to westbrook. Yeah he can't shoot.
Oh is that what happened? He chose to “skip” summer league?I can’t believe this MFer Scoot had the nerve to skip Summer League
Oh is that what happened? He chose to “skip” summer league?
What did happen?Oh is that what happened? He chose to “skip” summer league?
What did happen?
This kid already better than Scoot..
People who don't practice shooting with intention do not shoot well.Scoot's shooting % in G league was really bad too. People were hoping it was just a small sample size, but I think that's just him.
People who don't practice shooting with intention do not shoot well.
If he were to put in quality work with intention he would be a better shooter. It's as simple as that.
How often? How many times? Training with Curry a few times isn't going to change anything.I doubt it's anywhere near that simple, seeing as how he trained with Curry.
Correct, it's mainly between the head and the confidence. Young players also put to much pressure on themselves to impress, so they start to press more than letting the game come to them.I doubt it's anywhere near that simple, seeing as how he trained with Curry.
Crazy. After he had been in practice with the team every day for months getting shots up he became a more consistent shooter... It's almost like getting the consistent competitive reps made a difference...Correct, it's mainly between the head and the confidence. Young players also put to much pressure on themselves to impress, so they start to press more than letting the game come to them.
Look at Scoot's stats post all star break last year after a horrible first few months to the season :
16.6 PPG -
7.1 AST
3.5 REBS
40.2% FG
35% 3FG
1.3 STEALS
4.5 TO
And his stats in 7 games in April when he got free rant to run the team and got 36.7 MIN Per game
19.4 PPG
9.7 AST
3.4 REB
41.7 FG %
41.7 3P FG on 6.9 attempts per game
5.3 TO'S
1.3 STEALS
He needs to clean up his FG % and turnovers, but there rest of the stats are solid for a 20 year old at the time that never played college ball.
I really wonder how many of you in here have actually even played basketball before in any type of competitive setting or heck even touched a basketball. Some of the things said on here are just baffling at times.
What was our record in those games? What was his +/-?And his stats in 7 games in April when he got free rant to run the team and got 36.7 MIN Per game
What a dumb response, we were running out horrible lineups, that has nothing to do with his plus minus or record.What was our record in those games? What was his +/-?
What was our record in those games? What was his +/-?
How often? How many times? Training with Curry a few times isn't going to change anything.
That's insane. Consistent training with intention is what matters.That's irrelevant. Training with the best shooter in the history of the game is intention, which you claimed was missing. The real question is where on the intention scale he lands.
Solid points. I just hope he shows a more consistent shot as he plays more this season. One bad game shooting is fine.I prefer to use the eye test and Scoot's improvement through the year was obvious. If you rely on stats to judge talent then I guess I understand some of you saying he didn't improve.
Just like last night, he was the only guy on the court that could create. What exacerbates his production is the fact that Chauncey's offense has turned into this mix of pick &rolls and dribble handoffs. No sets, no design, just freelance. You tell me who is gonna create offense besides Scoot. Ayton? Toumani? Grant? Murray? Those are the other 4 starters last night. Maybe Clingan? Rupert? Walker? Wreath? The next best is Banton. A shoot first, second and third backup PG. Can't believe anyone would judge him by stats in this situation.
Just because the FO has intentionally refused to bring in competent point guards (like TYLER KOLEK for example) doesn't make Scoot good. They're pretty much forcing Chauncey to play Scoot big minutes because there's nobody else.You tell me who is gonna create offense besides Scoot.
What a strange comment when we have Ant on the roster and Brogdon was our best player last year.Just because the FO has intentionally refused to bring in competent point guards (like TYLER KOLEK for example) doesn't make Scoot good. They're pretty much forcing Chauncey to play Scoot big minutes because there's nobody else.