CIA: Russia influenced the election

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

One of the biggest electoral college victories in history??

Of the 57 election, he has the 12th *worst* percentage of electoral votes. Worse than both Obamas, Clintons and Papa Bush's electoral college %.

Since it went to 538, he is behind 9 other campaigns. The total Electoral vote total, he's like 21st.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/u...atedCoverage&region=Marginalia&pgtype=article

Following is the full text of a statement from a senior administration official, issued to The New York Times on Friday in response to questions about the federal government’s investigation into the integrity of the Nov. 8 presidential election. The government issued the statement to The Times on the condition that it be attributable only to a senior official.

The Kremlin probably expected that publicity surrounding the disclosures that followed the Russian Government-directed compromises of e-mails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations, would raise questions about the integrity of the election process that could have undermined the legitimacy of the President-elect. Nevertheless, we stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people.

The Federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. As we have noted before, we remained confident in the overall integrity of electoral infrastructure, a confidence that was borne out on election day. As a result, we believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.

That said, since we do not know if the Russians had planned any malicious cyber activity for election day, we don’t know if they were deterred from further activity by the various warnings the U.S. government conveyed.
 
One of the biggest electoral college victories in history??

Of the 57 election, he has the 12th *worst* percentage of electoral votes. Worse than both Obamas, Clintons and Papa Bush's electoral college %.

Since it went to 538, he is behind 9 other campaigns. The total Electoral vote total, he's like 21st.
It's almost as if they're lying intentionally to force a fake narrative...
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html

Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia

WASHINGTON — For much of the summer, the F.B.I. pursued a widening investigation into a Russian role in the American presidential campaign. Agents scrutinized advisers close to Donald J. Trump, looked for financial connections with Russian financial figures, searched for those involved in hacking the computers of Democrats, and even chased a lead — which they ultimately came to doubt — about a possible secret channel of email communication from the Trump Organization to a Russian bank.

Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.
 
NY Times invested huge sums and time of its reporters trying to win for the criminal. They're butt hurt.
 
NY Times invested huge sums and time of its reporters trying to win for the criminal. They're butt hurt.
If anything, given their huge bump in subscriptions after Trump won, you'd think they'd be happy!

Denny, you have kind of an obsession with butts getting hurt. I'm starting to think you need to find a good dominatrix.
 
Your own NYTimes link form yesterday:

One senior government official, who had been briefed on an F.B.I. investigation into the matter, said that while there were attempts to penetrate the Republican committee’s systems, they were not successful.

But the intelligence agencies’ conclusions that the hacking efforts were successful, which have been presented to President Obama and other senior officials, add a complex wrinkle to the question of what the Kremlin’s evolving objectives were in intervening in the American presidential election.
But Clinton's personal server wasn't hacked.

LOL
 
??? Where?
(BTW that guy is Reid's Deputy Chief of Staff - was probably in the room when Reid spoke to the Times.)

I think you need to consider the source.

People blamed Cheney/Bush for cherry picking conflicting intelligence.

Yet they're happy to do so when they think it explains why the worst candidate in history actually lost.
 
I think you need to consider the source.

People blamed Cheney/Bush for cherry picking conflicting intelligence.

Not Trump. He's blaming the CIA. Maybe he's planning to get rid of it and replace it with crack investigators like James O'Keefe.
 
Executive editor of the NY Times basically admits the paper was not not reporting America and the world honestly and was reporting with fear and favor.

So much for this rededication.

Now they're butt hurt. Yep.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/u...-from-the-publisher-and-executive-editor.html

To Our Readers, From the Publisher and Executive Editor

When the biggest political story of the year reached a dramatic and unexpected climax late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity.

After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters? What forces and strains in America drove this divisive election and outcome? Most important, how will a president who remains a largely enigmatic figure actually govern when he takes office?

As we reflect on the momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.

We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our readers. We want to take this opportunity, on behalf of all Times journalists, to thank you for that loyalty.

Sincerely,

Arthur Sulzberger Jr., publisher

Dean Baquet, executive editor
 
So much for the integrity of the WaPost, too.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/12/09/washington-post-on-the-fake-news-hot-seat.html

Washington Post on the ‘Fake News’ Hot Seat
At least one of the websites blamed in a story for supposedly circulating Russian propaganda is threatening to sue the storied newspaper.

The Washington Post—whose coverage of Watergate four decades agoangered the powers that be, toppled a president, and defined courageous journalism—has unleashed a hornet’s nest of a different sort, one unlikely to earn a Pulitzer Prize.

Indeed, Washington’s newspaper of record—which was purchased in 2013 by Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos from the storied Graham family—is uncomfortably weathering a barrage of criticism from fellow journalists and others for a front-page story published over the Thanksgiving holiday.

The story, by Post technology reporter Craig Timberg and published Nov. 24, purported to reveal how “sophisticated” Russian propagandists had spread fake news through hundreds of web sites to destabilize American democracy, thwart Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump to the White House.

...


There has also been a fusillade of disparaging commentary in publications ranging from The Intercept to The New Yorker.

“I thought it was completely ridiculous that the Post would put this sorry piece of trash on the front page,” Andrew Cockburn, the Washington editor of Harper’s magazine, told The Daily Beast in a typically vehement slam.

“The ‘Washington Post’ ‘Blacklist’ Story Is Shameful and Disgusting,” was the headline on Rolling Stone writer Matt Taibbi’s takedown.

The critics panned the Post story’s heavy reliance on the judgments of unnamed “researchers” for PropOrNot.com, a shadowy website launched three months ago ostensibly to expose “Russian influence operations targeted at US audiences, distinguish between propaganda and commercial ‘clickbait’, and help identify propaganda and push back.”
 
Something the butt hurt crowd will not want to consider is that whatever was hacked and released was the unvarnished and honest truth.

The unvarnished and honest truth hurt the criminal's chances of getting elected?

LOL

Fuck the truth, eh?
 
There must be a buried story where our national security tried to influence the re elections of Putin. Does it really matter? At least the Russians won't be so edgy since Hillary is at home. Look at the big lie Bush used to invade Iraq with weapons of "Mass Destruction. Our government can be sinister and often planned underhanded missions since the end of WW2. 67432505 Trump does Circus.jpg
 
Look at the big lie Bush used to invade Iraq with weapons of "Mass Destruction. Our government can be sinister and often planned underhanded missions since the end of WW2. View attachment 11147

well, of course we have. since long before ww2 as well.

does that mean we want every other country repaying us in kind for all our past aggression? because we have a lot more than a little hacking coming to us if so.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top