CIA: Russia influenced the election

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

The only way to be truly secure is to keep your computer from being connected to the internet in any way at all. And don't let anyone at all touch the computer.

Even copying files from a computer connected to the internet to one that isn't risks bringing a virus along with it.
 
The only way to be truly secure is to keep your computer from being connected to the internet in any way at all. And don't let anyone at all touch the computer.

Even copying files from a computer connected to the internet to one that isn't risks bringing a virus along with it.


OR.....keeping your own private illegal email server in your basement and hiding it from the Government who typically have a Cyber security team in each agency.
Oh wait.... Democrats don't like to hear about that.... Complain about hacking; yet give no fucks about officials going rogue with their own IT equipment. Makes sense! LOL
 
Oh my, part 2.

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/06/us/politics/donald-trump-wall-hack-russia.html

Mr. Trump, who has consistently expressed doubts about the evidence of Russian hacking during the election, did so again on Friday. Asked why he thought there was so much attention being given to the Russian cyberattacks, the president-elect said the motivation was political.

“They got beaten very badly in the election. I won more counties in the election than Ronald Reagan,” Mr. Trump said during an eight-minute telephone conversation. “They are very embarrassed about it. To some extent, it’s a witch hunt. They just focus on this.”

The president-elect also noted reports this week that the D.N.C. had refused to give the F.B.I. access to its computer servers after they were hacked.

“The D.N.C. wouldn’t let them see the servers,” Mr. Trump said. “How can you be sure about hacking when you can’t even get to the servers?” The D.N.C. has previously said that the law enforcement agency had not asked to examine the computers.

A senior law enforcement official said the F.B.I. had repeatedly emphasized to the D.N.C. the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data. The F.B.I. was rebuffed and had to rely upon a third party — a computer security firm brought in by the D.N.C. — for information.


He also said that the hacking of emails from the D.N.C. and top campaign officials for Mrs. Clinton had revealed that Mrs. Clinton received advance notice of debate questions and “many, many other things that were horrible.”

“How come nobody complains about that?” Mr. Trump said, referring to a tip that a CNN commentator and Clinton supporter, Donna Brazile, gave to Mr. Podesta ahead of a Democratic Party presidential debate in Flint, Mich.
 
Who is James Clapper? Director of National Intelligence.

Remember this?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2014/mar/11/james-clappers-testimony-one-year-later/

It was an exchange made famous not because of what was said at the time, but because of what Americans discovered later.

At the tail end of a rare open session of the Senate Intelligence Committee on March 12, 2013, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., asked National Intelligence Director James Clapper whether intelligence officials collect data on Americans.

Clapper responded "No, sir," and, "Not wittingly."

In the following months, a series of news stories fueled by leaks from former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden revealed that wasn’t the case. Reports showed the government was collecting and storing bulk metadata of American phone records, and had methods for capturing a vast amount of email and Internet data as well.

A year later,Clapper’s testimony represents one of the great, and unfortunate, holes in timely fact-checking. The challenge in discerning whether those with privileged information, particularly on matters of national security, are speaking truthfully in public is a difficult, if not impossible, task.
 
Oh my, part 2.

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/06/us/politics/donald-trump-wall-hack-russia.html

Mr. Trump, who has consistently expressed doubts about the evidence of Russian hacking during the election, did so again on Friday. Asked why he thought there was so much attention being given to the Russian cyberattacks, the president-elect said the motivation was political.

“They got beaten very badly in the election. I won more counties in the election than Ronald Reagan,” Mr. Trump said during an eight-minute telephone conversation. “They are very embarrassed about it. To some extent, it’s a witch hunt. They just focus on this.”

The president-elect also noted reports this week that the D.N.C. had refused to give the F.B.I. access to its computer servers after they were hacked.

“The D.N.C. wouldn’t let them see the servers,” Mr. Trump said. “How can you be sure about hacking when you can’t even get to the servers?” The D.N.C. has previously said that the law enforcement agency had not asked to examine the computers.

A senior law enforcement official said the F.B.I. had repeatedly emphasized to the D.N.C. the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data. The F.B.I. was rebuffed and had to rely upon a third party — a computer security firm brought in by the D.N.C. — for information.


He also said that the hacking of emails from the D.N.C. and top campaign officials for Mrs. Clinton had revealed that Mrs. Clinton received advance notice of debate questions and “many, many other things that were horrible.”

“How come nobody complains about that?” Mr. Trump said, referring to a tip that a CNN commentator and Clinton supporter, Donna Brazile, gave to Mr. Podesta ahead of a Democratic Party presidential debate in Flint, Mich.
All they gotta do is tweet that the FBI never asked and it becomes truth.
 
The american people celebrated Trump's win, too.

This has got to be one of the most sketchy and awkward claim of evidence of hacking.

Reminds me of that time when thousands of people celebrated 9/11 in NJ.

barfo
 
But you are in agreement that the whole thing is politicized. Therefore, can't be trusted.

Wikileaks? Yes, they sound pretty politicized. Why does Assange care if PEOTUS gets information first or last?

barfo
 
The only way to be truly secure is to keep your computer from being connected to the internet in any way at all. And don't let anyone at all touch the computer.

Even copying files from a computer connected to the internet to one that isn't risks bringing a virus along with it.

Can't argue with that logic. But a back end connected only to the the front end via links enabled via a another local system does come pretty damn close.
I see know way though, that an individual online account(s) can't be hacked at the users source and gain access to that account. Not the banks fault if reasonable
security procedures are provided to the customer(s).
 
Wikileaks? Yes, they sound pretty politicized. Why does Assange care if PEOTUS gets information first or last?

barfo

No, the intelligence agencies and reports are politicized.

Go ahead and deny it, head in sand.
 
Reminds me of that time when thousands of people celebrated 9/11 in NJ.

barfo

Want to try to weasel out about his claim being about New Jersey?

 


Breaking news.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/06/politics/trump-russia-intelligence-briefing/

Washington (CNN)President-elect Donald Trump said Friday he had a "constructive meeting" with the US's top intelligence officials who briefed him on alleged Russian election-related hacking, but added there was no impact on the results and he didn't directly acknowledge Moscow's responsibility.

"While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election, including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines," he said in a statement after the meeting.
 
Breaking news.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/06/politics/trump-russia-intelligence-briefing/

Washington (CNN)President-elect Donald Trump said Friday he had a "constructive meeting" with the US's top intelligence officials who briefed him on alleged Russian election-related hacking, but added there was no impact on the results and he didn't directly acknowledge Moscow's responsibility.

"While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election, including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines," he said in a statement after the meeting.

Your link.

"While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election, including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines," he said in a statement after the meeting.

Trump insisted that hacking did not impact the outcome of the election, which the Intelligence Community has never claimed was the case. And after lawmakers and intelligence officials expressed concern about his denigration of the Intelligence Community, he praised them in his statement.

"I have tremendous respect for the work and service done by the men and women of this community to our great nation," Trump said.
 
Your link.

"While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election, including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines," he said in a statement after the meeting.

Trump insisted that hacking did not impact the outcome of the election, which the Intelligence Community has never claimed was the case. And after lawmakers and intelligence officials expressed concern about his denigration of the Intelligence Community, he praised them in his statement.

"I have tremendous respect for the work and service done by the men and women of this community to our great nation," Trump said.

Where's the "conceded Russia was involved" part?

/thread
 
Where's the "conceded Russia was involved" part?

/thread

In a statement issued after the president-elect was briefed by senior American intelligence and law enforcement officials, Mr. Trump said: “While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines.”
 
In a statement issued after the president-elect was briefed by senior American intelligence and law enforcement officials, Mr. Trump said: “While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines.”

I'll ask again.

Where does he acknowledge they succeeded in breaking in?

The headline is bullshit.

outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top