BigGameDamian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 33,688
- Likes
- 13,660
- Points
- 113
Trump says he wishes the news wasn't so corrupt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not attacking @SlyPokerDog at all, I hope he understands that.Seems like it all boils down to propaganda. One propaganda machine, talking about Trump and Fox news (so basically another propaganda machine).

Oh I will!^^^C'mon guys...don't make me lock this thread.![]()
Does our federal administration have control of the numbers being released/reported by the individual states?
Why even waste people's time with ridiculous false equivalencies?
I was thinking of starting a new thread, but I decided to use this one instead. I know SlyPokerPanic has posted a lot of doom and gloom links, but here's one that is a little less ominous.
https://news.yahoo.com/oxford-study...e-221100162.html?soc_src=community&soc_trk=fb
Read this
You eat bats? Not baseball ones...There goes trump again with the "Chinese virus."
Deborah Birx is a fucking liar. I have both first and second hand knowledge of hospitals being absolutely slammed.
And over a thousand Americans have died without the president offering even a single condolence. Fuck this guy.
Here is an article that speaks favorably of Trump.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...RE_TZubxBYRn1yrEkoo8J1CLpOUtPSMpOuN6wBIF9TQlM
I was thinking of starting a new thread, but I decided to use this one instead. I know SlyPokerPanic has posted a lot of doom and gloom links, but here's one that is a little less ominous.
Yes, but that article you posted isn't being fair (so what else is new in these days). That guy that's referenced has zero credibility, but there are credible sources who are supporting the drug's use.
I'm not here to defend slipshod reporting by Fox. Just saying that the piece you posted is crap in that it tries to make it look like there's absolutely nothing behind the drug other than that dipstick.
Seems like it all boils down to propaganda. One propaganda machine, talking about Trump and Fox news (so basically another propaganda machine).
I'm not getting where you guys are seeing that article isn't being fair.
Here is what it is saying about the drug:
The unproven claim that an antimalarial drug can cure coronavirus - called a 'game-changer' and a 'gift from God' by Donald Trump - has been promoted by a crypto-currency lawyer who has made a string of bogus claims, DailyMail.com can reveal.
That is true. It's being tested as a treatment but not a cure. That's not bashing the drug.
The anti-malaria drug is now the subject of series of clinical trials, including in New York, where the state received 10,000 doses.
Again true. That statement is not bashing the drug and shows that it is being tested to see its effectiveness as a treatment.
It has been praised by Trump repeatedly - but the first time he did, at the White House last Friday, epidemiologist Tony Fauci stepped in to warn it was not scientifically proven to be effective and safe.
Again true and accurate.
Again, I'm not reading that article as bashing the drug.
What the article is exposing is someone, who does not have a medical background, is claiming that the drug is a cure.
Then the article goes on in depth supporting that claim.
Also Fox News and the Daily Mail are both on the same side of the political spectrum and the editor of the Daily Mail is the winner of the first Celebrity Apprentice.
Wow, that's fucked up and hurtful.
But fine, say what you want.
I feel like it comes off as propaganda right from the title. It brings Trump into it as clickbait. Trump isnt responsible for how, “legit”, the people are who claim to support something he believes is good. He didnt just randomly stumble on their cryptosite and go hey that looks good - well hopefully... I think it just seems to drag Trump and all that into it for no real good reason.I'm not getting where you guys are seeing that article isn't being fair.
Here is what it is saying about the drug:
The unproven claim that an antimalarial drug can cure coronavirus - called a 'game-changer' and a 'gift from God' by Donald Trump - has been promoted by a crypto-currency lawyer who has made a string of bogus claims, DailyMail.com can reveal.
That is true. It's being tested as a treatment but not a cure. That's not bashing the drug.
The anti-malaria drug is now the subject of series of clinical trials, including in New York, where the state received 10,000 doses.
Again true. That statement is not bashing the drug and shows that it is being tested to see its effectiveness as a treatment.
It has been praised by Trump repeatedly - but the first time he did, at the White House last Friday, epidemiologist Tony Fauci stepped in to warn it was not scientifically proven to be effective and safe.
Again true and accurate.
Again, I'm not reading that article as bashing the drug.
What the article is exposing is someone, who does not have a medical background, is claiming that the drug is a cure.
Then the article goes on in depth supporting that claim.
Also Fox News and the Daily Mail are both on the same side of the political spectrum and the editor of the Daily Mail is the winner of the first Celebrity Apprentice.
I appreciate the man's opinion. I think he is highly regarded and respected. That means something to me.Here is an article that speaks favorably of Trump.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...RE_TZubxBYRn1yrEkoo8J1CLpOUtPSMpOuN6wBIF9TQlM
Lived in Concord for a while in the 60's (behind the Port Chicago Ammo Dump) off Willow Pass.What I found at Berkeley Bowl market!View attachment 30395
The issue for me is that it gives the impression that that dweeb was the source that Trump was relying on when, in fact, there were credible sources that were reporting it. It reflects poorly on Fox that they used that guy as a source. It reflects poorly on Trump that he presented it as a game-changer when it hasn’t been tested. That said, nothing I’ve seen supports the notion that Trump relied on this report at all. It’s far more likely, IMO, that he was briefed on it as a potential treatment and then ran with it much farther than he should have.
You think I should’ve started a new thread?
I feel like it comes off as propaganda right from the title. It brings Trump into it as clickbait. Trump isnt responsible for how, “legit”, the people are who claim to support something he believes is good. He didnt just randomly stumble on their cryptosite and go hey that looks good - well hopefully... I think it just seems to drag Trump and all that into it for no real good reason.
Well Ive got no issue saying Trump should shut his mouth and have his twitter banned lol
Except Trump has been retweeting the guy's interviews on Fox News.
View attachment 30400
If Trump is retweeting interviews of him that's supporting him.
So your issue is tweets?