Deng (but NOT for Batum)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

You're going to be really disappointed posting on this board if you have an eye toward anything past this season. This is Imaginary Trade Land, Cap Be Damned, and if you disagree, you don't ever want to win a title. Mortgage the future for a futile run this year! Deng isn't going to lead the Blazers past OKC, anyhow. This is OKC's season to make the Finals. What they do with it, who knows, but teams like the Blazers that come out of nowhere don't make NBA Finals, no matter what bench players are added during the season.

I'm going to mark this day down -- first time I've ever agreed 100% with PapaG.

Deng would be appealing if Martell Webster was still the staring SF.

Also not interested in dealing CJ.
 
Rasta teams only get 15 players pretty sure the Cavs do not want to cut 3/4 people just to add all our scrubs from the bench.

I know, it's unideal. Where's RLEC when you need it? Olshey has been a bit too good in managing contracts.

Want to make a move for Deng and keep Batum then try something like http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=keckhk5

I thought about Wesley, and while I'd do it, I think Cleveland would be even less likely to.

Sigh. I just want Deng, but the planets are not aligned. Somebody else will get him and it's going to be maddening. If it's OKC I will be SO pissed.
Yea
 
Solid posts, Schilly. Thanks for infusing a dose of reality and long-term thinking.

(To be clear, I posted that playing Deng and Batum together might be intriguing. I didn't even look at the proposed 'trade' to get him here. I rarely do. ;) )
 
You're going to be really disappointed posting on this board if you have an eye toward anything past this season. This is Imaginary Trade Land, Cap Be Damned, and if you disagree, you don't ever want to win a title. Mortgage the future for a futile run this year! Deng isn't going to lead the Blazers past OKC, anyhow. This is OKC's season to make the Finals. What they do with it, who knows, but teams like the Blazers that come out of nowhere don't make NBA Finals, no matter what bench players are added during the season.

You slammed people for thinking long term when it was looking like LA wanted out.
 
You slammed people for thinking long term when it was looking like LA wanted out.

No, people wanting to trade LMA immediately for garbage were thinking short-term. There was no long-term thinking, just "ZOMGersh, better trade LMA for anything, because it's better than nothing when he walks!!!" Plus, anybody who doesn't wet their tighty whities at the first sign of adversity knew that when the team got better, LMA would want to stay. It's called not panicking at the first perceived bit of bad news.

Embarrassing as last summer was for you, I'm surprised you even bring up those idiotic LMA ideas as proof of some sort of long-term thinking. I don't think you understand what "long-term" planning really is, unless you're going to follow the old Clipper model because they got CP3.
 
Last edited:
No, people wanting to trade LMA immediately for garbage were thinking short-term. There was no long-term thinking, just "trade LMA for anything, because it's better than nothing if he walks!!!" Plus, anybody who doesn't wet their tighty whities at the first sign of adversity knew that when the team got better, LMA would want to stay.

Embarrassing as last summer was for you, I'm surprised you even bring up those idiotic LMA ideas as proof of some sort of long-term thinking. I don't think you understand what "long-term" planning really is, unless you're going to follow the old Clipper model because they got CP3.

Who was honestly saying, "trade LMA for anything?"

There were people, myself included, who thought we should start looking for a deal. Nobody was saying, "OMGERD! Get rid of LA now!!!111!" We were looking at potentially losing LA for nothing at the end of his contract, and we felt it was in the long term benefit of the team to trade him during all the rumors and talk that he wanted out.
 
Who was honestly saying, "trade LMA for anything?"

There were people, myself included, who thought we should start looking for a deal. Nobody was saying, "OMGERD! Get rid of LA now!!!111!" We were looking at potentially losing LA for nothing at the end of his contract, and we felt it was in the long term benefit of the team to trade him during all the rumors and talk that he wanted out.

I'm not revisiting it for the 100th time. You can spin it any way you want, but some of those posts were just so embarrassingly naive, I'm surprised anyone takes you seriously here. I thought your "fax machine" nonsense during the summer of Batum was bad enough, but now that I think of it, I can't wait to see what sort of hare-brained posts you come up with this summer, only to be proven wrong yet again.
 
I'm not revisiting it for the 100th time. You can spin it any way you want, but some of those posts were just so embarrassingly naive, I'm surprised anyone takes you seriously here. I thought your "fax machine" nonsense during the summer of Batum was bad enough, but now that I think of it, I can't wait to see what sort of hare-brained posts you come up with this summer, only to be proven wrong yet again.

It's fairly impressive how much you remember, because honestly I forget just about everything you post within a week or two. Tell me, do you keep an archive or do you just cling to these things long enough to rehash them over and over? You hadn't brought up the "fax machine" in a while, so I was just curious.
 
It's fairly impressive how much you remember, because honestly I forget just about everything you post within a week or two. Tell me, do you keep an archive or do you just cling to these things long enough to rehash them over and over? You hadn't brought up the "fax machine" in a while, so I was just curious.

Except when I'm "slamming" people in July, apparently. You remember those posts. You brought up LMA's board fiasco this summer, not me. :dunno:
 
NEW ORLEANS — There was talk, at this time last year, that Portland star LaMarcus Aldridge would rather be elsewhere.

Aldridge, 27 at the time, was an All-Star, in the heart of his prime years. The Blazers, though, were a young team still trying to figure out how to remain competitive in the Western Conference.

That was the basis for rumors of his unhappiness—the team was starting over, but Aldridge was already fairly advanced in his career. Aldridge was, indeed, disappointed with a 13-game losing streak to close the season, one that knocked Portland out of any hope of a playoff spot, but truth is, he was never angling to leave the team.

“He wasn’t happy with the fact that we didn’t make the playoffs and we lost 13 in a row, and nobody was,” Blazers coach Terry Stotts said. “He is a competitor and wanted to be part of a winning environment. That was his only thing.

"If you go back, anytime he was quoted, that is what he said. A lot of it is speculation and there were never any comments from him about being traded. He just—the season ended with a 13-game losing streak, and no one is going to feel good about that.”

Aldridge is feeling much better these days, with Portland coming out of the All-Star break at 36-17, tied for the West’s third-best record and on pace for the Blazers’ best finish in 15 years. He acknowledges frustration with the way things have gone for Portland in recent years—Aldridge was drafted alongside star guard Brandon Roy, saw Greg Oden picked No. 1 two years later, and was still a Blazer as each player’s career was ruined by injury.

The Blazers have been the league’s biggest surprise this season, and for Aldridge, the frustration of the last few years is gone.

“It has been great for me,” he said. “We definitely worked hard and put ourselves in a good position. I thought everybody came back better this year and I am happy with the way things are looking now. If we finish up strong, anything is possible.”
 
There are big men out there that can be signed to a veteran minimum who can give you what Robinson and Leonard are giving you. Kwame Brown, Jason Collins...

Kwame Brown would be an improvement over Leonard. He's not a bad backup at all.
 
Except when I'm "slamming" people in July, apparently. You remember those posts. You brought up LMA's board fiasco this summer, not me. :dunno:

6c543e1cbb9c98e8386e577db251aeb5a0628f77dd1021d8d5b604992d8f7aa1.jpg
 
he's an improvement for us though. With Freeland out we could use a veteran big off the bench.

He's played 31 games the last 3 years, combined. His knees are shot. If Kwame Brown had anything left, he'd be in the NBA right now, since he's only 30. Hell, Brown declined his $3m option this year with the Sixers, and in return, not a single team signed him for even the vet minimum.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top