BonesJones
https://www.youtube.com/c/blazersuprise
- Joined
- May 7, 2015
- Messages
- 44,580
- Likes
- 38,679
- Points
- 113
Your statistical analysis is beyond flawed:I disagree that DeRozan is better than CJ.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/tiny.fcgi?id=WZY5E
He's 2 years older.
He's a free throw whore.
CJ is a SIGNIFICANTLY better three point shooter. 40% compared to only 31%.
DeRozan had a higher USG% but only averaged 1.5 more ppg. DeRozan is their number one option on offense. But he barely averaged more points, and that's because CJ is a shooter. I think if you put CJ into an offense that utilizes him as their primary scorer, he could average 25+ ppg. Easily.
Getting to the line is a skill, and FTs by good FT shooters are the most efficient shot. Derozen shoots 5 FTs for every 2 CJ shoots. You somehow turned that into a negative against Derozen, which shows bias.
You're taking a stat that isn't affected by min per game (usage rate) and using it to judge a stat that is affected by min per game (which is PPG). That's an error in sampling. FYI - Derozen gets 3.1 more points per 36 (the same difference in their usage rate), and does so more efficiently (55.5 TS% compared to 53.6 TS%).
His usage rate is also affected by a slightly higher amount of turnovers, but he has more responsibility creating assists, which aren't factored into usage. His AST/TOV ratio is much better than CJs (2.36 compared to 1.79). Derozen is a much better playmaker for others than CJ is.
The result of this shows another advanced stats:
OFFENSIVE BOX PLUS-MINUS:
DD - 2.7
CJ - 1.4
OFFENSIVE WIN SHARES:
DD - 6.8
CJ - 3.7
Derozen's also (likely) a better defender.
Poeltl is also as good of a prospect as Collins. So it seems to me like you want to believe that we could've traded CJ for Kawhi so that you can justify your annoyance with Olsheys overall inactivity, so you picked certain stats and spun them a certain way in order to do so. I'm annoyed at his inactivity too, but not inn regards to this, since I try to judge everything fairly and unemotionally.
Last edited:
