Fantasy Football Trade(s) & Etc.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Haakzilla

Haakzilla

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
9,495
Likes
7,553
Points
113
Hey, all of you fantasy football gurus out there...what is your analysis of this trade scenario?!

DeAngelo Williams + Wes Welker --> OUT

Calvin Johnson + Clinton Portis --> IN :sherlock:

Also, feel free to discuss any fantasy football related topics in this thread...
 
Love Calvin this year. Not high on Portis at all. Is this a keeper league? PPR?
D-Will has proven to be a stud in a run first offense despite "splitting" carries with Stewart, and if Welker is 80% healthy or better, which I think he is, will catch 80+ balls this year.

Tough. If this a keeper league I might do the trade just so I could keep Calvin on my roster for the next decade. If not a keeper league, then I probably would not do it, especially if it's PPR. It's a close call.

Basically, I didn't help you at all.
 
The Professional Fan said:
Love Calvin this year. Not high on Portis at all. Is this a keeper league? PPR?
D-Will has proven to be a stud in a run first offense despite "splitting" carries with Stewart, and if Welker is 80% healthy or better, which I think he is, will catch 80+ balls this year.

Tough. If this a keeper league I might do the trade just so I could keep Calvin on my roster for the next decade. If not a keeper league, then I probably would not do it, especially if it's PPR. It's a close call.

Basically, I didn't help you at all.
Click to expand...

...NOT keeper. NO PPR. Standard scoring +/-.
 
The rest of my RB/WR roster includes:

DeSean Jackson

Devin Aromashodu

Ray Rice

Jerome Harrison

Dallas Clark [TE]

Tim Hightower

Felix Jones

Mike Williams
 
Mediocre Man said:
What is your leagues scoring system?
Click to expand...

Rushing Yards = 10 yards per point; 3 points at 100 yards; 5 points at 200 yards
Reception Yards = 10 yards per point; 3 points at 100 yards; 5 points at 200 yards

[TDs = 6 points | Fumbles = -1 point | Fumbles Lost = -1 point]
 
HAAK72 said:
Rushing Yards = 10 yards per point; 3 points at 100 yards; 5 points at 200 yards
Reception Yards = 10 yards per point; 3 points at 100 yards; 5 points at 200 yards

[TDs = 6 points | Fumbles = -1 point | Fumbles Lost = -1 point]
Click to expand...



How many players in your league? Do you play with a flex player, or TE?
 
Other fantasy football topics:

My other team, "Suck My Ditka", made a great move last night in benching Drew Brees
 
Mediocre Man said:
Other fantasy football topics:

My other team, "Suck My Ditka", made a great move last night in benching Drew Brees
Click to expand...

CRUCIAL! I am benching Welker and DeAngelo in week 1 in favor of Harrison and Aromashodu...
 
I don't like the deal. Portis sucks, and I'm not sure Johnson....who is a superior talent....will catch more than Welker because of the offenses they are in. I'd rather take a chance on Brady getting my guy the ball than Stafford.
 
Mediocre Man said:
I don't like the deal. Portis sucks, and I'm not sure Johnson....who is a superior talent....will catch more than Welker because of the offenses they are in. I'd rather take a chance on Brady getting my guy the ball than Stafford.
Click to expand...

The way I see it, DeAngelo is on a downward trend. Matt Moore is their QB and teams will be daring them to pass, even more so than in the past. J-Stew is on an upward trend and whatever the split was last year, he won the battle. Even if it is the same split this year, then DeAngelo is valued the equal...if not lower. Portis is "healthy", no time-share, and a QB upgrade to take even more pressure off. Welker will catch a lot of passes, gain some yards, but I don't see him scoring many TDs. Calvin on the other hand, should compile top 5 stats at WR. Overall, a significant upgrade at the WR1 position with a nominal downgrade at the RB2/3 position. A risky gamble perhaps, but I love to gamble!
 
HAAK72 said:
Rushing Yards = 10 yards per point; 3 points at 100 yards; 5 points at 200 yards
Reception Yards = 10 yards per point; 3 points at 100 yards; 5 points at 200 yards

[TDs = 6 points | Fumbles = -1 point | Fumbles Lost = -1 point]
Click to expand...

That is my scoring system, and I was just looking for some input on my team and who I should start this week.

2 RBs

3 WRs

Ok, so....
(YAHOO! PROJECTIONS IN PARENTHESIS)

QB: Brett Favre vs. Miami (13.53) or Joe Flacco at Cincinnati (14.33)?

RBs (pick two): Frank Gore vs. New Orleans (14.74), Arian Foster @ Washington (15.82), Steven Jackson @ Oakland (10.65), Knowshon Moreno vs. Seattle (11.45)
 
VanillaGorilla said:
That is my scoring system, and I was just looking for some input on my team and who I should start this week.

2 RBs

3 WRs

Ok, so....
(YAHOO! PROJECTIONS IN PARENTHESIS)

QB: Brett Favre vs. Miami (13.53) or Joe Flacco at Cincinnati (14.33)?

RBs (pick two): Frank Gore vs. New Orleans (14.74), Arian Foster @ Washington (15.82), Steven Jackson @ Oakland (10.65), Knowshon Moreno vs. Seattle (11.45)
Click to expand...



Flacco should do better than Favre

Foster is an easy start, but don't expect him to duplicate what he did last week. I still think Seattle had a fluke win, so I would start Moreno as well. No idea who your recievers are though? I don't like Gore because SF can't ballance his runnig game out. Oakland has an above average run defense, despite last week
 
Mediocre Man said:
Flacco should do better than Favre

Foster is an easy start, but don't expect him to duplicate what he did last week. I still think Seattle had a fluke win, so I would start Moreno as well. No idea who your recievers are though? I don't like Gore because SF can't ballance his runnig game out. Oakland has an above average run defense, despite last week
Click to expand...

So you think Moreno over Jackson? And I forgot to mention I also have Darren McFadden.

My receivers are: Marques Colston, Steve Smith (NYG), Percy Harvin, Santana Moss, Mark Clayton
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top