AgentDrazenPetrovic
Anyone But the Lakers
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 7,779
- Likes
- 34
- Points
- 48
Is this where she got the 8 million number from? Only 1.4 million of them were actually used.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is this where she got the 8 million number from? Only 1.4 million of them were actually used.
Not sure if you were posting to agree with me or disagree with me, but this article proves what I said.
If ~2/3 of illegals are paying taxes, then, as I said, illegal aliens are NOT paying as much tax as a citizen earning the same amount of money.
Not sure if you were posting to agree with me or disagree with me, but this article proves what I said.
If ~2/3 of illegals are paying taxes, then, as I said, illegal aliens are NOT paying as much tax as a citizen earning the same amount of money.
That would depend on how many citizens are paying taxes.
barfo
One study from several years ago says the illegals cost us $10B/yr. Whether the study is conclusive or accurate is a question that is begged.
In any case, $10B works out to about $1.60/week per person in the workforce. Per capita, it's $.33/week. I think tax on a gallon of gasoline in California might be $1.60...
Small price to pay for 10M+ workers who work below minimum wage level. You certainly benefit $.33/week for cheaper agricultural products alone.
advocate.
I'd say that study is questionable. As I mentioned, in California, we have to tack on an extra 10% to our budget every year to cover unexpected costs associated with illegal aliens. We're talking ~$12 billion per year, for California alone.
Wait, what?
You want to quote a number for how much illegals "cost" us, but then assume that the study doesn't account for any gains that we get due to them?
Either:
1) The study you are referring to has already taken into account the "benefit" I / we get from them being here and now you are double-dipping on the "benefits".
or
2) The study you are referring to is garbage and useless since it clearly isn't an exhaustive study.
That would depend on how many citizens are paying taxes.
barfo
Unexpected costs? Why are they unexpected?
Wait, what? There are lots of reasons why a study would only report on costs and not benefits. It doesn't make the study garbage, it just means you can't use it to compute the net effect.
barfo
I'd say that study is questionable. As I mentioned, in California, we have to tack on an extra 10% to our budget every year to cover unexpected costs associated with illegal aliens. We're talking ~$12 billion per year, for California alone.
Wait, what?
You want to quote a number for how much illegals "cost" us, but then assume that the study doesn't account for any gains that we get due to them?
Either:
1) The study you are referring to has already taken into account the "benefit" I / we get from them being here and now you are double-dipping on the "benefits".
or
2) The study you are referring to is garbage and useless since it clearly isn't an exhaustive study.
Everything is about TCO. Total cost. Includes all costs and benefits.
Sorry, do you want to use a different term? There isn't a line item in the budget for "covering our ass from illegal alien costs".
So, in your mind a study that compared costs of, say, medical syringes available from various suppliers would be completely worthless, because it didn't factor in the possible economic effects of saving (or killing) people with said syringes?
barfo
Sorry, do you want to use a different term? There isn't a line item in the budget for "covering our ass from illegal alien costs".
There are no unexpected costs.
You can surely budget $4B for education and $500M for incarceration and $1B for medical services.
Those are California's mandated expenses and the $4B isn't technically for illegals.
Hey, I didn't write the budget. I'm just relaying information that I read here in California. Would it be better if they just built the cost into the other expenditures to hide it from the people?
I think it should be widely published how much we need to budget for illegal aliens.
I just don't know what you meant. You said that every year, you had to put in an extra 10% that wasn't in the budget for unexpected costs. That suggests that the problem is with the budgeting, not the aliens. The number of aliens isn't growing so fast that it is impossible to budget for.
barfo

Hmm, interesting. I wasn't aware that all of these illegal immigrants paid all of these taxes on the up and up. I guess I missed the part where the US government issued all of these people who are in this country illegally social security numbers. Would you mind explaining those "fucking facts" to me?
Thanks a bunch.
We need to get you on the state budget committee ASAP.
On second thought, I've seen some of your thoughts on spending. Nevermind.![]()
You really don't understand?? LMAO that is very ignorant. Please do some research Maxie.
So you would like to get rid of the Coast Guard, protection for the President and his family, law enforcement agencies combating human smuggling and child exploitation, the integrity of our financial currency and the enforcement of immigration laws? That's brilliant. Welcome to ignore.

I don't get this whole recent phenomenom of posters informing others they are ignoring them.
lame.

So, are you contradicting what I said, or just getting in a shot?
Not that you were serious, but I'm not eligible to be on your state budget committee. Sounds like they could use help from someone though.
barfo
What makes somebody eligible to be on the state budget committee?
