Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 42,535
- Likes
- 26,921
- Points
- 113
Here's what David Thorpe said to Henry Abbott:
You know, I've never understood why people like this guy and Chad Thorpe suddenly ascend to the status of Basketball Oracles without actually evey having done anything. And this guy has favorites (often players who've paid him to be their trainer) that he constantly plugs. And up till now he's been saying that Oden will be great. Right up until this week, when Oden sprains his ankle. My question is: did he see the footage of Oden spraining his ankle? Did he see the angle the foot was twisted? If he loved Oden up to this point, but suddenly he's going to be a permanent gimp, what effect was that foot getting bent like that supposed to have? Was Oden supposed somehow to have been unaffected? Only players with "soft tissues that can't take poundings" would be affected? Or was his foot not supposed ever to bend back like that no matter what happens?
I'm not an idiot: it's possible that Oden could be injury prone. But this guy has suddenly switched THIS WEEK to saying this?
My take on Oden is that he could be like Rik Smits, a guy who never did much when he was heavy but became useful when they changed policy and had him go skinny.
(Oh, and anyone hear of Zydrunas Ilgauskas? He had BAD foot issues for his first two seasons, and has been a warhorse ever since. Can't we hope for that?)
So considering that Oden is yet again hurt, and he is so after just one quarter of his first game, I'm left to feel that this will be normal for the rest of his career.
You know I'm a very "glass is half full" guy, and I think the planet (and the basketball world) is much better off having Greg Oden realize his star potential. He's the kind of person I want my son to emulate one day. Humble and honest, smart and hard working.
But to think that after he recovers from this injury he'll likely be mostly injury free for a number of years flies in the face of all my basketball experiences. Some people have skeletons, or soft tissues, or tendons and ligaments, that are just not meant to take a physical pounding on a daily basis. Oden is very likely one of these guys.
It's apparent to me that he'll never develop into the superstar he was sure to become because he'll never be healthy enough long enough for that to happen. That's horrible for Greg, Blazer fans, and for basketball fans to swallow, but it seems accurate to me.
You know, I've never understood why people like this guy and Chad Thorpe suddenly ascend to the status of Basketball Oracles without actually evey having done anything. And this guy has favorites (often players who've paid him to be their trainer) that he constantly plugs. And up till now he's been saying that Oden will be great. Right up until this week, when Oden sprains his ankle. My question is: did he see the footage of Oden spraining his ankle? Did he see the angle the foot was twisted? If he loved Oden up to this point, but suddenly he's going to be a permanent gimp, what effect was that foot getting bent like that supposed to have? Was Oden supposed somehow to have been unaffected? Only players with "soft tissues that can't take poundings" would be affected? Or was his foot not supposed ever to bend back like that no matter what happens?
I'm not an idiot: it's possible that Oden could be injury prone. But this guy has suddenly switched THIS WEEK to saying this?
My take on Oden is that he could be like Rik Smits, a guy who never did much when he was heavy but became useful when they changed policy and had him go skinny.
(Oh, and anyone hear of Zydrunas Ilgauskas? He had BAD foot issues for his first two seasons, and has been a warhorse ever since. Can't we hope for that?)


