Tince
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2008
- Messages
- 15,517
- Likes
- 15,089
- Points
- 113
For fuck’s sake man, learn the difference between correlation and causation. You seem to have the two confused.
I think I have a good understanding of the difference between the two. If you would like to explain which is which in terms of passing and wins, I would love to hear your theory and why the trend line goes in a negative direction.
Unfortunately, whichever you decide, the data will not support the conclusions that have been drawn. The amount of passes or the amount of passes that lead to assisted attempts do not correlate with winning. Not my opinion, it's what the data above says.
Also of note, causation vs correlation matters when you're trying to indentify which of the two variables is the determinant in the other. For example, do assists go up when you make more shots or do you make more shots when your assists go up. In this case, because the trend line has a slight negative slope and near zero correlation, I'm not sure causation vs correlation even matters.
I know the personal insults are meant to avoid the topic at hand, but I think staying on topic would be more enjoyable for others.
Last edited:
