Game Thread GAME# 42: BLAZERS @ ROCKETS - JANUARY 15, 2020 - WEDNESDAY, 6:30 PM, ESPN & NBCSNW

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Grade Stotts for the first half of the season (considering all the injuries, new players, etc.)


  • Total voters
    48
  • Poll closed .
Westbrick and Lillard embraced and hugged each other after game WTF is going on here lol Russ was still talking sh!t

they have both expressed lots of respect for the other many times. Westbrook is just a trash-talker; it bugs fans of other teams but it's pretty harmless, and it gets Westbrook going...that's a crazy little world, that mind of his. I suspect Dame is more of a trash-talker than we suspect....he's a master of timing though; the 'what-time-is-it' gestures are an example. And that wave after his game-winner against OKC is HOF trash-talking. In that case, a gesture was worth a bazillion words.

I don’t care what our record is beating Russ and harden will always be the best.

it's pretty good, but beating the Lakers, when they are a good team, is the best for me. Too bad the Supersonics are the Thunder, beating Seattle was always a rush too

Oh and I can't wait to be told that I have no idea what I'm talking about

why wait?....you suck!
*******************************************

what I saw: Blazers didn't have 2 or 3 efficiency voids among the 5 starters. Everybody played well or better.

* Bazemore did some Bazemore things but he kept those to a minimum...for the most part. Took a few of his typical wft shots, but he spent very little time out of control, was disruptive on defense, and any time he has a 3-to-1 assist/turnover outing it's a success

* CJ didn't have a great game but he had a good game and played within the framework of the offense. He had 3 or 4 MeJ moments, but that's way less than normal...and he was a willing passer almost all the time. There were several times last night, especially in the 2nd half, when he got the ball and I expected him to shoot no matter what, like he often does, but he moved the ball well and passed instead. More of that please

* Whiteside didn't shoot well, but an 18-18-2blk night was essential to the win. No hollow stats...again...whatever the hell that means

* Dame was Dame last night. I didn't like 3 or 4 of those heat check three's because he had driving lanes all night. I understand that if he'd made any of them they would have seemed like daggers, but his dribble-drive were daggers too, and opened up offense for teammates. I think his 3rd Q won the game for Portland. Houston was desperately trying to mount a comeback but Dame kept saying fuck that, and from there, the rockets ended with a whimper in the 4thQ...well, mostly whimper, Russ was loud as usual but walked off the floor whimpering at the end

* Melo was great and probably should have had more opportunity. It was a great mixture of quick moves and bully-ball. I really liked that he didn't burn much shot clock with his iso; it was quick decisions and aggressive takes. Maybe that's why he was 7-10 instead of 3-10

* the bench was ok...not a lot of production but they helped build the lead in the 2nd Q and helped maintain the lead at the bottom of the 3rd and top of the 4th quarters

watching the game it was: how can Portland be 17-24 and how can Houston be 26-13? Both teams played opposite of their records, but that's the NBA most nights. It's a big reason why I'm a fan
 
Horrible competitor. He's all about himself and making sure he looks good and then he makes bad decision after bad decision and his team loses.

That may well make him a lesser player but you cannot fault his effort when plenty of guys around the league just don't have any fight in them. Look Houston has the best backcourt in the league by any measure and their record shows it. They are a top team.
 


Love that shit.

Trent was indeed a stud on defense last night.

He seems to be settling down on offense, and his shooting stroke is nice. I stated my doubts last season that Trent would last in the league, but if he continues to focus on and replicate that kind of defense, he has a very good chance of becoming a very valuable 3 and D player off the bench.

And we've dearly needed one of those.

In fact, I'm starting to envision him taking over for Baze next season. Third year leap, right?

:cheers:
 
I hate to say this, but looking back at last nights game and Houston missed A LOT of good looks. Last night I thought the defense was better, but I'm not sure it was that much better the second time around. It's a make or miss league.
 
So all this time it wasn’t injuries... we still had talent but Stotts used the wrong strategy for 41 games?
Maybe it took time for the players and coaches to adjust to all the injuries. Plus, Stotts has beaten both Harden and Westbrook in the playoffs so he’s very experienced gameplanning for them. Stotts is a very good playoff coach and this felt like a playoff game.
 
Maybe it took time for the players and coaches to adjust to all the injuries. Plus, Stotts has beaten both Harden and Westbrook in the playoffs so he’s very experienced gameplanning for them. Stotts is a very good playoff coach and this felt like a playoff game.

Dame is a very good playoff coach.

Stotts is not.
 
Stotts is a very good playoff coach and this felt like a playoff game.

playoff winning percentages of some coaches:

Erik Spoelstra .602
Alvin Gentry .567
Mike Dunleavy .535
Scott Brooks .522
Frank Vogel .508
Rick Adelman .503 (.522 in Portland)
Doc River .503
Mike Budenholzer .500
Mike D'antoni .500
Lionell Hollins .488
Rick Carlisle .483
Bob Hill .459
Jack Ramsay .431 (.492 in Portland)
Dwayne Casey .382
Quinn Snyder .370
Bernie Bickerstaff .364
Terry Stotts .357
Nate McMillan .347

well, he's slightly better than Nate McMillan. I don't think that means he's a "very good playoff coach" though. If he is there's a whole bunch of excellent playoff coaches
 
Maybe it took time for the players and coaches to adjust to all the injuries. Plus, Stotts has beaten both Harden and Westbrook in the playoffs so he’s very experienced gameplanning for them. Stotts is a very good playoff coach and this felt like a playoff game.
It doesnt take 41 games to run different schemes, Eric.
 
I hate to say this, but looking back at last nights game and Houston missed A LOT of good looks. Last night I thought the defense was better, but I'm not sure it was that much better the second time around. It's a make or miss league.
They were hot. Then they were cold.

That's the way the ball bounces.

I'll take it :)
 
Defense and max effort are worth a lot.

You mean, the things this forum as a collective whole have been begging for all season?
Yes.

Now that I look at it, I think both of those things depend on focus. To me when someone is at the peak of their athleticism as NBA players are, the mental focus, leading to an uptick in good decision making, reaction time, and effort, is probably the most difficult to achieve.

Conclusion: Don't depend on mental midgets.

:cheers:
 
playoff winning percentages of some coaches:

Erik Spoelstra .602
Alvin Gentry .567
Mike Dunleavy .535
Scott Brooks .522
Frank Vogel .508
Rick Adelman .503 (.522 in Portland)
Doc River .503
Mike Budenholzer .500
Mike D'antoni .500
Lionell Hollins .488
Rick Carlisle .483
Bob Hill .459
Jack Ramsay .431 (.492 in Portland)
Dwayne Casey .382
Quinn Snyder .370
Bernie Bickerstaff .364
Terry Stotts .357
Nate McMillan .347

well, he's slightly better than Nate McMillan. I don't think that means he's a "very good playoff coach" though. If he is there's a whole bunch of excellent playoff coaches

I knew he was awful. I didnt know he was that bad. Good god we need a new coach.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top