Greyvtrayn
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2013
- Messages
- 3,195
- Likes
- 525
- Points
- 113
Yeah, if Kreider's O/U for goals next regular season was 49.5 I would not hesitate to hammer the under. He will be closer to 30 than 50 by a wide margin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kreider won't score 50 next year, but 35 is fair. I see no reason why Z and Panarin (if here) won't do what they always do. And I disagree on Lafreniere. He is ready to explode next season, and I have little doubt he will. And Miller will take his offensive game up also I think.
Z is a very good player, and is a C, which we need badly, I am good with him. I really am.Zib, Kreider and Panarin all have awful contracts and NMCs so i know it can't happen, but i'd move on from them. They've all been here long enough and we've seen they're not going to be the ones to lead this team anywhere and turn the team over to the future.
I have to be honest, I just haven't seen it with Kakko. I know that is polarizing to write in here, I don't want to get into is it him is it the coach back and forth again, but I just have not seen it with this kid. Look at Kakko vs. Lafreniere, and it isn't close. Both treated the same way, yet Lafreniere is about to explode and Kakko looks lost to me.
With all that said, Kakko is so young so still plenty of time to be what we all want him to be, so by no means writing him off at all, and I would have played him tonight, but I just haven't seen it at all with him. He looks really lost to me.
We also said the last coach had an issue with Kakko also. HHHMMMMM...
It’s not terribly unlikely as he is worth more than what he has signed here for. But his NMC is why it won’t happen. Really wish we would stop giving those out or at least give players only a limited NMC. Give us 10 teams you won’t go to every year and that’s that. Enough with full NMCs. Beyond stupid and handcuffs us from building a complete team.I have to be honest, I just haven't seen it with Kakko. I know that is polarizing to write in here, I don't want to get into is it him is it the coach back and forth again, but I just have not seen it with this kid. Look at Kakko vs. Lafreniere, and it isn't close. Both treated the same way, yet Lafreniere is about to explode and Kakko looks lost to me.
With all that said, Kakko is so young so still plenty of time to be what we all want him to be, so by no means writing him off at all, and I would have played him tonight, but I just haven't seen it at all with him. He looks really lost to me.
I agree - still an open book on where he will go. But today right now I have not seen much from him to be this guy we all make a big deal out of not playing, or ice time, or the impact he can have on the game. I write that while saying he would have played tonight if I were the coach, but I also don't think it would have really mattered. He has a lot of work to do on his game.Missing half a year will do that.
Kakko’s got injury issues, which is a concern. He has flashes where he shows what he can be, but he’s still not filling out like he should be. He plays like a 0anarin but without the skill. He’s had games where he’s put it together, but not often enough. I don’t have an issue with trading him as he doesn’t seem to fit Gallant and Gallant isn’t going anywhere until after next season (his track record says he will be fired in year 3 which concerns me about our guys regressing back to their norms). Someone is gonna give him an offer sheet though and then our hands are tied.I have to be honest, I just haven't seen it with Kakko. I know that is polarizing to write in here, I don't want to get into is it him is it the coach back and forth again, but I just have not seen it with this kid. Look at Kakko vs. Lafreniere, and it isn't close. Both treated the same way, yet Lafreniere is about to explode and Kakko looks lost to me.
With all that said, Kakko is so young so still plenty of time to be what we all want him to be, so by no means writing him off at all, and I would have played him tonight, but I just haven't seen it at all with him. He looks really lost to me.
We also said the last coach had an issue with Kakko also. HHHMMMMM...
That’s the reason why I half joked to wait and see where Strome goes and try to trade him there.Agreed - that is why it is unlikely 94 - dude has a NMC. That's the point.
This fatigue thing is angering me now. This is the ECF - look in the mirror for why we went 7 and 7. Good for Z saying nothing to do with fatigue. Gallant and the MSG guys playing into it, is a joke.
You already have Drury who has been a winner then you add Mess.
What do you want him say..he said exactly what everyone on here was saying..they looked a step behind..they looked flat..they looked tiredOne thing I agree with you on regarding Gallant Step, I did not like his presser at all. That was a loser presser on his part. Blaming fatigue, not really answering questions, he needs to do much better than that. I'll give him a break right after the game, but that was a really weak effort by Gallant, and make me question him a bit.
Sorry but I completely disagree with this. Say what Z said, this is the ECF, nothing to do with fatigue. Not I'm so happy you brought that up, because we were tired and it caught up to us. That is a big reason our O went to sleep. That is loser excuse talk - it just is.What do you want him say..he said exactly what everyone on here was saying..they looked a step behind..they looked flat..they looked tired
Pretty sure people were talking about rust as an excuse and how tampa wasn't aharp..well if that's a legit excuse playing 20 high intensity games in 40 days is an excuse too.And I am not saying the team wasn't worn down, or beat up, they were, but welcome to the NHL playoffs. TB has played 700 playoff games the past 3 seasons, they are pushing through. Youngest team in the playoffs. Is that why Panarin had two even strength points in 13 games? Give me a break. Man up and don't make excuses. Weak.