Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,174
- Likes
- 57,386
- Points
- 113
I disagree. I think there’s gonna be at least one guy who we all bitch about not drafting in a few years.Not at #7
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I disagree. I think there’s gonna be at least one guy who we all bitch about not drafting in a few years.Not at #7
Jokic was drafted in the 2nd round. He is better than Dame. You never know.Not at #7
That is some serious photoshopping phone skills to make it look like you actually posted that! Props!
That is some serious photoshopping phone skills to make it look like you actually posted that! Props!
Click the link.
Jokic was drafted in the 2nd round. He is better than Dame. You never know.
I dont click links. You own this place. You manipulated it.
So like….. one of them doesn’t get swept by the Warriors. They take a game or two off them?
How dare you! Dogs are the most honest creatures in the world.
I bet you're right. I bet there's more than just one, there could be four. It very well could be Sharpe. If the OG trade doesn't go down, I'll be fine drafting someone. I kind of want it to be Sochan because I think he has a great chance to make an immediate impact and could end up a big time two way star... and at the same time I think we might be able to get him at 9 and take another swing at 25.I disagree. I think there’s gonna be at least one guy who we all bitch about not drafting in a few years.
This guy I listened to talking about Chauncey as a coach, he's been on the Grant trade for a while...he's actually got a sharp mind for basketball...knows his stuff.This is how I see at least half the posters around here in my head every time I read a meltdown thread.
You love to see it
CJ, Nance for Hart, Grant, Ingles, HughesYeah all it took is trading a better player than Olshey did during his 9 years here. Silly tweet.
I guess functionally it's just as good to get fleeced and then fleece someone else as it is to make a solid trade the first time. Unfortunately we haven't been able to justify the Clippers trade in the same way yet. But don't get me wrong, I'm good with Joe today... he made most of us happy... we'll see how we're feeling after tomorrow but I think he's going to give us a lot more hope than we've had in a while... probably since Neil let LaMarcus walk.CJ, Nance for Hart, Grant, Ingles, Hughes
Yes? Normality when you trade better players away you get better players back.CJ, Nance for Hart, Grant, Ingles, Hughes
So hypothetically, if we traded Norm and Covington for Bledsoe, Winslow and a first, would that have been ok?I guess functionally it's just as good to get fleeced and then fleece someone else as it is to make a solid trade the first time. Unfortunately we haven't been able to justify the Clippers trade in the same way yet. But don't get me wrong, I'm good with Joe today... he made most of us happy... we'll see how we're feeling after tomorrow but I think he's going to give us a lot more hope than we've had in a while... probably since Neil let LaMarcus walk.
Seems like fair valueYes? Normality when you trade better players away you get better players back.
Not really, no. If the first was in this draft I would have thought it was a little better than getting Keon but I'm not sold on Winslow just because he had a handful of good games with a bunch of guys no one had seen play together and scouted... I'm hoping Wislow can be a good 8th or 9th man, Bledsoe is either going to be salary filler in a trade or 4M in dead cap space and unless that was a high first rounder which it wouldn't have been, it just doesn't add up to the production that Norm and RoCo are capable of. Right now it looks like they'll be very useful as the first and second guys off the bench on a team that could realistically contend.So hypothetically, if we traded Norm and Covington for Bledsoe, Winslow and a first, would that have been ok?