How we keep Napier?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Labinot41

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Messages
9,328
Likes
8,953
Points
113
Eric griffith said: The better Napier plays the harder it is for the Blazers to keep him next year. I know to keep Nurkic is the Most Important thing, but I think it's also important to keep napier because he's Playing great with Dame and Cj in the 3 guard line up and i really like his game. Well he also could be tradet at the deadline but if he's continue to Play like this i would like to resign him
 
Eric griffith said: The better Napier plays the harder it is for the Blazers to keep him next year. I know to keep Nurkic is the Most Important thing, but I think it's also important to keep napier because he's Playing great with Dame and Cj in the 3 guard line up and i really like his game. Well he also could be tradet at the deadline but if he's continue to Play like this i would like to resign him

Got to keep Nurk because we have no other center.
Got to keep Noah because he is our best PF
Want to keep Napier ....just because he is good

How? We need to make a trade this year so we are not over the luxury cap..... just in case we need to go over next year to resign these guys. Try to avoid the repeat offender rule.
Neil will catch heat but he needs to dump someone.
 
I'd like to have a player that isn't a 6' score-first guard that's able to contribute to the team. So, as great as it is that Bazz is playing well, he's largely irrelevant as he's the 3rd small score-first guard on the depth chart.
 
I'd like to have a player that isn't a 6' score-first guard that's able to contribute to the team. So, as great as it is that Bazz is playing well, he's largely irrelevant as he's the 3rd small score-first guard on the depth chart.

Small guys are better shooters and better ball handlers. I am fine with 3 of them on a 15 man roster. If height was such a factor, taller guys would be stopping them. I would rather have a quick player who is a few inches too short but actually stays with his man than a taller player who gives the short quick players a few feet of space because he's scared the guys will blow by them.

Can't have too many shooters who can handle the ball IMO. Those 3 are our only 3........ who can do both.
 
Last edited:
This is why you overpay 2nd rate players like Turner, Hark, Crabbe etc...you never know how its going to come back to bite you.

Maybe the Blazers should trade Damian for Anthony Davis and keep Napier as the starting PG.
 
He's gonna stay. Turner and harkless one of them HAVE to go. I love ed, but i think he's go to.
 
How much is he realistically going to get and how much will we be able to pay? I think he gets no more than $5M, we should be able to give him that.

I think we'll draft a small forward and let Harkless go.
 
How much is he realistically going to get and how much will we be able to pay? I think he gets no more than $5M, we should be able to give him that.

I think we'll draft a small forward and let Harkless go.
Teams seemed to be interested in Harkless...I'd deal him just for the cap space to retain Vonleh and Napier.
 
Teams seemed to be interested in Harkless...I'd deal him just for the cap space to retain Vonleh and Napier.

Yup I would be happy to just dump Harkless for cap space

Layman could do just as anything Harkless can. Shit anybody on this board could fill in for Harkless
 
I will say it is a long season. Right now neither Harkless nor ET are shooting very well and we tend to focus on that. While Napier and Leonard (2 games) are both shooting well. I am sure things will flip flop a few times throughout the season. Thus the life of bench players. But yeah Neil only has a couple months to figure out how he wants to get under the luxury tax for this season. Then worry about the next few seasons later.
 
Got to keep Nurk because we have no other center.
Got to keep Noah because he is our best PF
Want to keep Napier ....just because he is good

How? We need to make a trade this year so we are not over the luxury cap..... just in case we need to go over next year to resign these guys. Try to avoid the repeat offender rule.
Neil will catch heat but he needs to dump someone.
assuming Nurk is the #1 priority frankly IMO its better to sign Napier and Vonleh than to draft more rooks, I'd probably look to trade Meyers or Turner or Hark and add this years pick and/or Biggie to shed salary. If we keep Vonleh Biggie is not needed
 
Last edited:
I'd like to have a player that isn't a 6' score-first guard that's able to contribute to the team. So, as great as it is that Bazz is playing well, he's largely irrelevant as he's the 3rd small score-first guard on the depth chart.

Did you watch the Memphis game? Napier didn't shoot when he had at least 4 good looks at the basket.

He looks like a player who works hard and tries to be good at his position.

Please don't let him be the next Patty Mills. i'd hate to see him end up as a "bargain" at San-Antonio or Houston.
 
I think we should keep Vonleh and Napier next season. But I got strange filling that Olshey will trade Vonleh sometimes this season due to him drafting Swanigan and Collins. You know Olshey don't want to be wrong about his draftees. I hope he don't due to Vonleh is powerful rebounder and very good defender. Last night he also starting get more comfortable and confidence on offense. But there Olshey saying Swanigan is better than Vonleh now I am starting to feel that Olshey is not as good as he thinks he is.
 
I think we should keep Vonleh and Napier next season. But I got strange filling that Olshey will trade Vonleh sometimes this season due to him drafting Swanigan and Collins. You know Olshey don't want to be wrong about his draftees. I hope he don't due to Vonleh is powerful rebounder and very good defender. Last night he also starting get more comfortable and confidence on offense. But there Olshey saying Swanigan is better than Vonleh now I am starting to feel that Olshey is not as good as he thinks he is.
I hope not, I love the Caleb story but he just does not have the physical tools that Noah does, especially quickness/jumping that Noah has and while it took Noah a while he appears to be finally "getting it" and it's hard to believe he is only 22 until next August. Assuming Nah can keep up this level of play I'd keep Noah and maybe even look to move biggie if he could help dump one of our bad contracts.
 
Did you watch the Memphis game? Napier didn't shoot when he had at least 4 good looks at the basket.

He looks like a player who works hard and tries to be good at his position.

Please don't let him be the next Patty Mills. i'd hate to see him end up as a "bargain" at San-Antonio or Houston.
I'm just saying we need a player who isn't a short scoring guard more than we need another short scoring guard. We have so much redundancy in the short scoring guard department. That said, I have no issue with Bazz - it's better that we have him than not have him. And I don't think he'll cost too much to retain. I just think it's far more important to get some diversity in our roster.
 
I'm just saying we need a player who isn't a short scoring guard more than we need another short scoring guard. We have so much redundancy in the short scoring guard department. That said, I have no issue with Bazz - it's better that we have him than not have him. And I don't think he'll cost too much to retain. I just think it's far more important to get some diversity in our roster.

I respectfully disagree. Whenever Dame or CJ are down to injury or a bad night our team is struggling. I also don't love the idea of Dame playing the entire 1st quarter every time or CJ having to fill up two positions every night.
It is no coincidence that when Napier is ON we have a better chance to win.

Sure, i would love to have a tall 6th man who is capable of defending as well as shooting and finishing like Bazz, but those kind of players are more rare and come at a premium price.
 
Love Bazz, but he is very replaceable.

I can't think of an NBA team what would pay him $10 mil per (except maybe the Olshey Blazers :) )
 
Teams seemed to be interested in Harkless...I'd deal him just for the cap space to retain Vonleh and Napier.

I would deal him for a young struggling player, preferably. Someone like Beasley or Stanley Johnson (he isn't struggling anymore?). Leaves us with more cap space AND some additional talent.
 
I would deal him for a young struggling player, preferably. Someone like Beasley or Stanley Johnson (he isn't struggling anymore?). Leaves us with more cap space AND some additional talent.
I'd be inclined to use him to help dump Turner or Meyers
 
I'd be inclined to use him to help dump Turner or Meyers
You would need a team with $20M or $27M cap space willing to be crap for another year because Harkless does not really improve you much. I don't see that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top