- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,412
- Likes
- 43,901
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
381/6 = 64?
Only included him because it's the easiest way to match salary on an Ed/Vonleh/Collins for Brown/filler deal (which is essentially what any POR big for BOS wing would have to be). Only other way I see is:
View attachment 15799
Certainly a plus in my book, yes, but I'm also trying to find ways to make the salaries match while keeping the deal relatively balanced. How 'bout this Semi-excluding deal? As an added bonus for Boston, it sends the Celtics every player on our roster that grew up in the Boston area.You just like Semi...
Certainly a plus in my book, yes, but I'm also trying to find ways to make the salaries match while keeping the deal relatively balanced. How 'bout this Semi-excluding deal? As an added bonus for Boston, it sends the Celtics every player on our roster that grew up in the Boston area.
View attachment 15800
But I doubt the C's would be interested because they'd have to part with Smart too, and that basically screws up their guard rotation.
Seriously--try to find a somewhat-balanced deal that improves the C's front-court rebounding/defense, improves the Blazers' wing rotation, doesn't bring back Morris (who is apparently a deplorable person, per @Natebishop3), and doesn't decimate the C's backcourt. Brown/Ojeleye/Yabusele for Davis/Vonleh/Collins is about the only thing that works.
Probably. But if we could get the #3 pick from last year's draft--who happens to fill a position of need (IMO)--shouldn't they at least consider it?I don't think that there's any chance that the Blazers give up on Collins this early.
Probably. But if we could get the #3 pick from last year's draft--who happens to fill a position of need (IMO)--shouldn't they at least consider it?
In the current NBA, big for small is not really that big a deal anymore. And I believe that Brown very well could be a game-changer, at least much moreso than Collins, given our present depth charts at the 3 and 5 spots.Boston has little I'd want at this point. We had a deficit at the bigs positions, bigs by committee of under performers (except Nurk). We lost wing depth with Crabbe gone. I prefer not to deal away bigs now that we're actively addressing improvement there.
I'm not opposed to trades, just not in favor of dealing big for small. Unless the small is a game changer for us.
Probably. But if we could get the #3 pick from last year's draft--who happens to fill a position of need (IMO)--shouldn't they at least consider it?
Likely he wouldn't. IMO the only way he would would be for a package like what I created--a big who can improve the team immediately while also being an expiring contract, and two young front-court lottery prospects who can solidify the team's future rotation. From the Celtics' standpoint, with Hayward and Tatum in house for at least the next 4 years, who would project to be of greater value to them over the long-haul: Brown or Vonleh/Collins?Yeah, I probably would. I doubt that Ainge would be willing to part with him though.
I'm basing this on the majority opinion that Harkless at the 3 is the biggest gap in our starting lineup. Not everyone is as high on him as you are.I'm still trying to figure how JB fills a position of need. Because Crabbe is gone? Sans Carmelo aren't we set at SF? Brown is redundant no?
Likely he wouldn't. IMO the only way he would would be for a package like what I created--a big who can improve the team immediately while also being an expiring contract, and two young front-court lottery prospects who can solidify the team's future rotation. From the Celtics' standpoint, with Hayward and Tatum in house for at least the next 4 years, who would project to be of greater value to them over the long-haul: Brown or Vonleh/Collins?
Again, I know it's not a deal that will actually happen, but I've fully convinced myself that it would make a ton of sense for both sides.
I'm basing this on the majority opinion that Harkless at the 3 is the biggest gap in our starting lineup. Not everyone is as high on him as you are.
Agreed--which is why my first post contained the caveat:I didn't say that there isn't merit to the trade idea...just that GMs are usually pretty reluctant to give up on first round picks so early.
One of those deals where both teams say no, though, I think.
Depends on your perspective. He rebounds, he defends, and he can score a little. What more do we really need from the PF spot given what surrounds him at 1/2/5? Clearly they're not quite the same caliber of player, but would anyone have called Buck Williams the weak spot in the '90 team's starting lineup? Vonleh's an offensive-efficiency-uptick away from being a very similar player, and is only 21 (until tomorrow).Yeah. I'd rather have Hark then Brown.
And he's certainly not the biggest gap. That would be Vonleh.
Depends on your perspective. He rebounds, he defends, and he can score a little. What more do we really need from the PF spot given what surrounds him at 1/2/5? Clearly they're not quite the same caliber of player, but would anyone have called Buck Williams the weak spot in the '90 team's starting lineup? Vonleh's an offensive-efficiency-uptick away from being a very similar player, and is only 21 (until tomorrow).
Agreed--which is why my first post contained the caveat:
Sounds like we mostly agree. I'm just spending a little time in fantasyland, that's all.
Like I said, not the same level of player or talent, but I'm not really comparing the player (especially since one was in his prime and the other is barely old enough to have graduated college) so much as the role. Buck's role on those early 90's squads is very similar to Vonleh's role on this team, and honestly I think he's very close to being able to fill that role nearly as well as Buck did.Don't compare him to buck.
Buck averaged a double double with 18PPG before coming to Portland.
Agreed! I'd take even "bitter beer face" vs. Mild LeoTARD dumbass I hate ur face any day!I hate his face
In the current NBA, big for small is not really that big a deal anymore. And I believe that Brown very well could be a game-changer, at least much moreso than Collins, given our present depth charts at the 3 and 5 spots.
Who were our starting PF and C in the playoffs last year?
With Plums the year before, we fared much better (2nd round).
Just sayin'
I think that Boston will sign Tony Allen, then maybe would could entice them with a trade of Ed Davis for Marcus Smart and BOS's right to Swap 1sts with us in 2018.They could definitely use Ed Davis, and maybe even Meyers Leonard:
Meyers had his best game of the season, by far, against BOS back in January.
But, what does BOS have left that we would want that Ainge would be willing to part with? Ainge has clearly, finally bought into the youth movement. So, he's not going to give us anyone under 24 for Davis or Leonard. Even if he could, with no one other than Horford, Hayward or Irving are making more than $5.7 million. So, it would be hard to make the salaries work.
Noah Vonleh would be a good get for them. The age is right, he's already shown he's an above average rebounder (their biggest need) and defender at the NBA level, but what would they be willing to give up to get him?
BNM
doesn't bring back Morris (who is apparently a deplorable person, per @Natebishop3),
The Morris twins are among five men charged in the alleged assault of a 36-year-old man at the Nina Mason Pulliam Recreation Center. Another of the men, Gerald Bowman, was a safety at USC who is preparing for this year's NFL draft. Their first court appearance is scheduled for May 7.
From this article, the trial should have started this week:
https://www.si.com/nba/2017/07/07/a...ons-criminal-trial-markieff-morris-suspension
Who were our starting PF and C in the playoffs last year?
With Plums the year before, we fared much better (2nd round).
Just sayin'
