- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 10,701
- Likes
- 2,826
- Points
- 113
That doesn't make sense to me. Management liked him well enough to pay him more than any other team was gonna, and the Blazers have been much worse without Nurk available (I saw 3-6 in some pregame notes today, although I didn't look it up to verify).I'm betting they're trying to use that 1st to dump Nurk. Who knows if they will find any takers though.
Giving up value to get rid of the only good player we have over 6'8" on our roster would be idiocy. To do so because he doesn't fit with a system that has no record of success makes even less sense.