dviss1
Emcee Referee
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 29,686
- Likes
- 27,665
- Points
- 113
Damn cheap too compared to the American Civil war. Lincoln should have followed the lead, instead of starting a war.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Slavery-Abolition-Act
AT the start of the civil war, there were just over 3 million slaves in the US, owned by some 100,000 people in the population of 33 million.
So if Britian freed 800,000 slaves for 20 million pounds, the 80 million should have freed 3.2 million in the US. 80 million pounds was about 400 million dollars in that era. Very cheap compared to a war that cost a million lives
and a cost in dollars in the billions. Lincolns government during the war, was the first nation every to exceed a budget of 1 billion dollars a year, most of which was to pay for the war.
Of COURSE you would advocate that we PAY the SLAVE OWNERS...
Please just avoid any discourse with me... I.. just can't...