Politics Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing, now with New allegations!

[DaLincolnJones]

you're just lucky you're not on ignore!

Pres, you crack me up

 

[CupWizier]

Hahaha, hey Thank you! I will be glad to be considered a Deplorable.

As to hurting my feelings? Really? Have you not noticed how little regard I have for your posts, that I seldom bother to reply?

and yet here you are................ replying. lmao!

 

[tlongII]

lol, now that's pretty weak. Why would she say 100% it was Kavanaugh? Why wouldn't Kavanaugh ever say after being asked multiple times if he would welcome an FBI investigation?

She might believe it was Kavanaugh.

An FBI investigation would delay the appointment.

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

She might believe it was Kavanaugh.

An FBI investigation would delay the appointment.

 

[CupWizier]

She might believe it was Kavanaugh.

An FBI investigation would delay the appointment.

you are really grasping now. The FBI investigation is said to not take more than a week. Why the hurry? Isn't the truth more important to you? It is to me.

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

you are really grasping now. The FBI investigation is said to not take more than a week. Why the hurry? Isn't the truth more important to you? It is to me.

One week from now: ONE WEEK ISN'T ENOUGH! WE NEED MOAR!

 

[MarAzul]

Just bros who treat women like objects and casualty and rape them

He is lying

Sounds like a weak mind.

 

[Chris Craig]

Sounds like a weak mind.

Nothing weak about it

 

[DaLincolnJones]

One week from now: ONE WEEK ISN'T ENOUGH! WE NEED MOAR![/QUOT



At least it will not be a TV extravaganza

 

[Hoopguru]

This FBI investigation should be easy!
Kav under Oath said he wasn't at the party. It should be very easy to get someone to corroborate if he was or not.

 

[yankeesince59]

Her memory can be faulty. She seems very easily confused and is totally scatterbrained.

...but yeah, Kavanaugh was completely believable.

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

This FBI investigation should be easy!
Kav under Oath said he wasn't at the party. It should be very easy to get someone to corroborate if he was or not.

You would have to establish a party took place.

 

[yankeesince59]

With character witnesses and contemporaneous backup of the parties she claims were there.

She has produced nothing. While she may have experienced trauma and some kind of incident some time, she has not made any case to view her as reliable.

...neither has Kavanaugh...unless of course you want to count that oh so compelling "calendar".

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

...neither has Kavanaugh...unless of course you want to count that oh so compelling "calendar".

She would need to state when and where the party was for that to happen. It just can't be some mysterious party that no one knows when or where it happened.

 

[Chris Craig]

This just in Kavanaugh wasn't lying. He was using alternative facts, oh wait...

 

[DaLincolnJones]

This FBI investigation should be easy!
Kav under Oath said he wasn't at the party. It should be very easy to get someone to corroborate if he was or not.

Yeah, and I see where his buddy, Judge is willing to talk to the Feds..they ask him, her friend, her annalist..there is not much more that one can do

 

[Strenuus]

This is going to be either a mini-series, or full blown movie in 5 years.

 

[Hoopguru]

The Supreme Court Justices should always maintain an equal partisanship. Number wise. If there ever is a libertarian/ or Independent, they would be neutral, and could sway opinion by siding one way or another on any issue.
If a democrat retires, dies or goes to jail, that seat is replaced by a demo and the same for the righties.
I don't think this position should ever be a lifetime appointment and possibly an age limit implemented.
My idea would be 16 years max and no longer than 80 years old. This could include two full terms for each side of service.

Much of passion about politics right now involve the social issues, and with the media now days 24/7 always hyping things, this makes for a dangerous climate!
Term limits would help.

 

[DaLincolnJones]

This is going to be either a mini-series, or full blown movie in 5 years.

Haha more than likely..I dont remember, did they make a movie about the pubic hair on the Coke can?

 

[calvin natt]

How ‘bout we just find another person who maybe hasn’t raped or assaulted someone. People keep saying this is not a legal case but a job interview. Ok. Pretty sure next time I’m interviewing for a job and i say hey it’s not confirmed yet but people are saying I used to sexually assault people but let’s not get into the weeds on that ok? I probably won’t get that job.

 

[Chris Craig]

This is going to be either a mini-series, or full blown movie in 5 years.

Who will play Kavanaugh?

 

[Chris Craig]

How ‘bout we just find another person who maybe hasn’t raped or assaulted someone. People keep saying this is not a legal case but a job interview. Ok. Pretty sure next time I’m interviewing for a job and i say hey it’s not confirmed yet but people are saying I used to sexually assault people but let’s not get into the weeds on that ok? I probably won’t get that job.

This

Probably not

 

[CupWizier]

Who will play Kavanaugh?

Jerry O'Connel

 

[Boob-No-More]

BNM

 

[MarAzul]

This FBI investigation should be easy!
Kav under Oath said he wasn't at the party. It should be very easy to get someone to corroborate if he was or not.

Seems like. Of course you do sort of have to know where and when it was.

 

[calvin natt]

This is absolutely pathetic. How can these people live in the real world?

 

[Chris Craig]

This is absolutely pathetic. How can these people live in the real world?

Disgusting. Conservatives are dirty and disgusting

 

[Chris Craig]

Jerry O'Connel

Lying Ted Cruz?

Will Lindsey Graham be played by a woman?

 

[MarAzul]

The Supreme Court Justices should always maintain an equal partisanship. Number wise. If there ever is a libertarian/ or Independent, they would be neutral, and could sway opinion by siding one way or another on any issue.
If a democrat retires, dies or goes to jail, that seat is replaced by a demo and the same for the righties.
I don't think this position should ever be a lifetime appointment and possibly an age limit implemented.
My idea would be 16 years max and no longer than 80 years old. This could include two full terms for each side of service.

Much of passion about politics right now involve the social issues, and with the media now days 24/7 always hyping things, this makes for a dangerous climate!
Term limits would help.

Sorry Hoop! But I just can't buy it.

This isn't about party, it only has become that in recent years.
This now is about whether we follow the Constitution and amend it by the prescribed process or we let un-elected Judges amend it as they see fit.

The beauty of the Constitution is the stability it provides in that it takes a super majority to change it. This is totally lost if we have judges that change it as they see fit rather than following what it says. This has been going on now for the past 40 years and is making things worse as we go rather than correctly fixing what should be. We no longer even try.

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

I guess the 3rd woman claiming something against Kavanaugh (the one represented by Creepy Porn Lawyer, Esq) has an Oregon Connection. WebTrends, an Portland Based company sued her for filing false sexual harassment

http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/28/kavanaugh-accuser-swetnick-sued/

The woman who charges she was gang-raped at a party where Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was present, Julie Swetnick, had a lawsuit filed against her by a former employer that alleged she engaged in “unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct” towards two male co-workers, according to court documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

WebTrends, a web analytics company headquartered in Portland, filed the defamation and fraud lawsuit against Swetnick in Oregon in November 2000 and also alleged that she lied about graduating from Johns Hopkins University.

WebTrends voluntarily dismissed its suit after one month. Avenatti told The Daily Caller News Foundation that the case was ended because it was “completely bogus.”

Swetnick’s alleged conduct took place in June 2000, just three weeks after she started working at WebTrends, the complaint shows. WebTrends conducted an investigation that found both male employees gave similar accounts of Swetnick engaging in “unwelcome sexual innuendo and inappropriate conduct” toward them during a business lunch in front of customers, the complaint said.

Swetnick denied the allegations and, WebTrends alleged, “in a transparent effort to divert attention from her own inappropriate behavior … [made] false and retaliatory allegations” of sexual harassment against two other male co-workers.

“Based on its investigations, WebTrends determined that Swetnick had engaged in inappropriate conduct, but that no corroborating evidence existed to support Swetnick’s allegations against her coworkers,” the complaint said.

After a WebTrends human resources director informed Swetnick that the company was unable to corroborate the sexual harassment allegations she had made, she “remarkably” walked back the allegations, according to the complaint.

In July, one month after the alleged incident, Swetnick took a leave of absence from the company for sinus issues, according to the complaint. WebTrends said it made short-term disability payments to her until mid-August that year. One week after the payments stopped, WebTrends received a note from Swetnick’s doctor claiming she needed a leave of absence for a “nervous breakdown.”