Kevin Love sweepstakes

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

I like Zach's future, but if we could do a Butler/CJ swap, then I would be much more interested in Love for Collins.

Dame/Curry/Simons
Butler/Stauskas/Trent/
Harkless/Turner
Love/Aminu/Layman
Nurkic/Swanigan/Biebs
If we did this I’d much rather have...

Dame/Curry/Simmons
WB4/Simmons/Trent
Butler/ET/Layman
Love/Amino/Hark
Nurk/Love

Swan/ML and Nik would be 13-15...I really dislike those 3
 
If we did this I’d much rather have...

Dame/Curry/Simmons
WB4/Simmons/Trent
Butler/ET/Layman
Love/Amino/Hark
Nurk/Love

Swan/ML and Nik would be 13-15...I really dislike those 3
If roll with this:
Lillard / WB IV
Curry / WB IV / Trent
Butler / Harkless
Love / Aminu
Nurkic / Collins

Butler is a good facilitator, so WB IV off the bench would mean we'd have two playmakers in at all times.
 
You do realize that when Collins is entering his prime that Dame and CJ will be at the trail end of there's. Same with Nurk though. At some point we're going to have to make some tough choices. Just saying.
This is historically wrong.

When you look at almost ever team that has won they have a little of everything.

They have a strong core of guys at the same age range, but also often have some older vets and a couple young potentials on the bench.

A balanced roster age wise is just that. older vets for leadership. Some young potential for high speed gas usage and your core to lean on the bulk of the time.

It’s okay to have a couple players be on the for front or backend of their careers and not have the whole roster be within a few years of each other.

Jordan’s first ring came with Cartwright as his center.

His fifth was with a young bj Armstrong running point.
 
I hate to even think this out loud, but I wonder if PA will eventually get tired of being frozen out of the FA market, believe that Portland cannot compete in today's NBA, and move the team up north. As a fan I would hate it, but as a business person I can see how it would make a lot of sense. There may even be some Blazer fans outside of Portland that would think this would be the best way to compete.
As a business person he should move them to Las Vegas.
 
I hate to even think this out loud, but I wonder if PA will eventually get tired of being frozen out of the FA market, believe that Portland cannot compete in today's NBA, and move the team up north. As a fan I would hate it, but as a business person I can see how it would make a lot of sense. There may even be some Blazer fans outside of Portland that would think this would be the best way to compete.

Possibly the best thing that can happen to Portland is to get a baseball team. You can’t flip the switch overnight. But over time, a second sport will garner more national exposure to the city in general. Baseball would provide Portland a sports outlet for the nba offseason to help maintain interest in hanging around town rather than taking off. Our summer weather is some of the best in the nation.
MLB stars flying in and out all summer long. Tv time and national ballpark exposure (if they put it down on the river) highlighting the surrounding downtown and rose quarter/lloyd district.

Another thing I think would help is to build some legit beaches on the Columbia. Haul in tons of good beach sand and build some legit parks. Help provide a more Cali/Florida atmosphere with regards to water/beach entertainment.
Build a legit amusement/water park in the area.

I think baseball would be a huge help in possibly turning the corner with our nba fa appeal. But if all of these things weee done over the next decade, I think it could catapult our appeal in the eyes of many stars.
 
My Raiders and Blazers in Vegas? Hmmmm
Complete BS. Though I will enjoy the homefield advantage when my Broncos beat up on those Raiduds. Every game will be a 50/50 split of NFL fans in Ol' Vegas.
 
Complete BS. Though I will enjoy the homefield advantage when my Broncos beat up on those Raiduds. Every game will be a 50/50 split of NFL fans in Ol' Vegas.
You’re underestimating the strong fan base of raider fans still in LA...and the 3.5 hr drive from LA to Vegas(or 1hr flight). I highly doubt your 50/50 dream.

Good luck with the keenum years though
 
Well that trade isn't happening
 
Maybe they think they can get a trade package like the Clippers got for Blake's bloated deal. Not sure which of the two contracts are the worst.

In the bright side, it is now a plausible trade of Turner and Leonard for Love.
 
I can't look it up at the moment, how long is it until he is eligible to be traded now?
 
I can't look it up at the moment, how long is it until he is eligible to be traded now?
Since it's a four-year extension, it appears that he cannot be traded for six months.

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q95

95. Can a player be given an extension and traded at the same time?
Similar to a sign-and-trade arrangement (see question number 92), a team may sign an eligible player to an extension (see question number 58) and immediately trade him to another team. Such an "extend-and-trade" is limited to three seasons, which include any seasons remaining on the player's current contract1. The salary in the first season of the extension can have a 5% raise over the last season of the existing contract, and subsequent raises are limited to 5% of the salary in the first season of the extension. The 5% limit also applies to both likely and unlikely bonuses.

A player cannot be traded in an extend-and-trade after the season (for example, on draft day) in the last season of his contract, or in any season that might be the last season due to an option or ETO.

Since an extend-and-trade has greater limits than a regular extension (three seasons and 5% raises vs. four seasons and 8% raises), the rules prevent teams from circumventing these limits by extending and trading the player in separate transactions. If a team extends a player beyond the limits of an extend-and-trade (for example, if they sign a player to a four-year extension), they can't trade the player for six months. Conversely, a team cannot extend a player it receives in trade for six months, if the extension exceeds the limits of an extend-and-trade2.

Extend-and-trade transactions are rare. To date they have only been used for Kevin Garnett (traded from Minnesota to Boston in 2007) and Carmelo Anthony (traded from Denver to New York in 2011).

A rookie scale contract (see question number 47) can be extended and traded in an extend-and-trade transaction, although there is no benefit to doing so. A rookie scale extension can be signed immediately after the player is traded (such as with James Harden's trade to the Rockets in 2012), and a rookie scale extension (see question number 58) can be much larger than the extension allowed through an extend-and-trade.

1 The current season counts as one full year, even if the extension is signed as late as June 30. So if a contract is extended on June 30 with one full season remaining, only one new season can be added to the contract with an extend-and-trade.
2 This does not apply to extensions of rookie scale contracts. For example, the Oklahoma City Thunder traded James Harden to the Houston Rockets on October 27, 2012, and the Rockets signed him to an extension four days later.
 
Looking more and more like Neil won’t be able to do much more this offseason. Not sure why I expected anything different.

Gotta bank on one of the rookies making an impact and/or Collins taking the next step in his game.
 
Small market team can't afford to let their star to go for nothing, they traded 2 No. 1 draft pick for him. I think that's asset retention in the terms by NO.
They need to sign him to a longer deal to give them either a change in the East or asset to make trade down the road instead of trading him for nothing since team will see it as a rental.
 
Small market team can't afford to let their star to go for nothing, they traded 2 No. 1 draft pick for him. I think that's asset retention in the terms by NO.
They need to sign him to a longer deal to give them either a change in the East or asset to make trade down the road instead of trading him for nothing since team will see it as a rental.
The problem is he just went from an okay amount of trade value (granted probably less than he should be) to zero trade value in the future. It's the same thing that happened with Blake Griffin. No one wants to take on a deal that pays someone who is injury prone over $30 million per year into their mid-30's. Plus, by signing Love instead of trading him they are more likely to lose their 2019 1st round pick.
 
There is prevailing thought in my twitterverse that this makes Love more tradeable since there isn't a fear of him bolting in a year.
Yeah, I imagine Cleveland looks to move him, but now hes not a rental.
The problem with that is, you trade for him, and you have him 4 more years at 30 a year
 
The problem is he just went from an okay amount of trade value (granted probably less than he should be) to zero trade value in the future. It's the same thing that happened with Blake Griffin. No one wants to take on a deal that pays someone who is injury prone over $30 million per year into their mid-30's. Plus, by signing Love instead of trading him they are more likely to lose their 2019 1st round pick.

As yuy said, more than one person is saying that there is one GM that will panic and take on that mega contract.

Kevin Love for Ryan Anderson plus picks works under the trade tracker. Think Houston would not jump on that?
 
Back
Top