Least Tornadoes in the last 60 Years

[PapaG]

Should we credit Climate Change for this development?

 

[PapaG]

Hurricane data, too.

 

[PapaG]

This is what is called propaganda. Open your eyes...

 

[SlyPokerDog]

A couple of questions for you, for whatever reason, volcano, meteorite, etc do you think if we had to we could change the climate? Do you think humankind will intentionally change climates in different areas of the planet in the future?

 

[ABM]

This is what is called propaganda. Open your eyes...

FIFY

 

[PapaG]

A couple of questions for you, for whatever reason, volcano, meteorite, etc do you think if we had to we could change the climate? Do you think humankind will intentionally change climates in different areas of the planet in the future?

"Humankind" is a blip on the radar in terms of what happens to the planet, and any belief that "humankind" can impact whatever happens to the planet is foolish. Especially when you consider that China, India, and most of Asia doesn't buy into this bullshit, and is actually growing their economy while we in the West pay grifters posing as scientists to tell us how we should live.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

"Humankind" is a blip on the radar in terms of what happens to the planet, and any belief that "humankind" can impact whatever happens to the planet is foolish.

WHAT?!? Either you're kidding or you're just too wrapped up in the limited point you're trying to make to think clearly.

Yes or No, can humans intentionally change the climate on this planet?

 

[PapaG]

WHAT?!? Either you're kidding or you're just too wrapped up in the limited point you're trying to make to think clearly.

Yes or No, can humans intentionally change the climate on this planet?

NO!!!

At least not in terms of reducing CO2. The CO2 levels keep rising, while the global temperature is stagnant.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesta...e-global-temperatures-are-not-following-suit/

 

[ABM]

WHAT?!? Either you're kidding or you're just too wrapped up in the limited point you're trying to make to think clearly.

Yes or No, can humans intentionally change the climate on this planet?

Found this on a quick search.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011...purposes-and-climate-control-for-decades.html

Mainly pertains to precip. Creating pressure systems might pose a significant challenge, though.

 

[ABM]

http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/blogs/weather/Weather-Modification-185347761.html

 

[ABM]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoengineering

 

[SlyPokerDog]

NO!!!

10 nukes is enough to send the planet into nuclear winter and that is most definitely a huge change to the climate of the planet.

 

[PapaG]

You're kidding me, right SPD? You really believe that humans can change the direction of the climate? Based on what data?

 

[PapaG]

http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/blogs/weather/Weather-Modification-185347761.html

Humans can't even stop a drought right now. There is literally no way that humans can now impact the climate enough to change it.

The ignorance of some of you is scary to me.

 

[PapaG]

10 nukes is enough to send the planet into nuclear winter and that is most definitely a huge change to the climate of the planet.

LOL

What an uninformed and idiotic post. How many nukes were tested in Nevada alone?

 

[PapaG]

How many nukes have been tested in China? Enough for a 'nuclear winter'?

 

[ABM]

Humans can't even stop a drought right now.

The ignorance of some of you is scary to me.

Who are "some of you"? And ignorant of what, specifically?

I simply pulled a few quick references of some of the work being done on the matter. I posed no opinion.

 

[PapaG]

Who are "some of you"? And ignorant of what, specifically?

I simply pulled a few quick references of some of the work being done on the matter. I posed no opinion.

The "work being done on the matter" has so far cost millions of taxpayer dollars with no success in the macro-planetary world.

 

[ABM]

The "work being done on the matter" has so far cost millions of taxpayer dollars with no success in the macro-planetary world.

Millions? Then they should just stop.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

LOL

What an uninformed and idiotic post. How many nukes were tested in Nevada alone?

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11287-nuclear-winter-may-kill-more-than-a-nuclear-war.html

 

[PapaG]

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11287-nuclear-winter-may-kill-more-than-a-nuclear-war.html

'Nuclear winter' may kill more than a nuclear war

From a 2007 article, no less. LOL

I also have to laugh at how most of the comments are deleted by the site, since they most likely call out the dumb "science" behind this opinion article.

We're a nation of idiots.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

How many nukes have been tested in China? Enough for a 'nuclear winter'?

So there are no amount of nukes that could cause a nuclear winter? That could change the climate on the planet? Really?

 

[SlyPokerDog]

From a 2007 article, no less. LOL

I also have to laugh at how most of the comments are deleted by the site, since they most likely call out the dumb "science" behind this opinion article.

We're a nation of idiots.

New Scientist is pretty reputable.

And I never said which would kill more. Not sure why you quoted that. I asked you can we intentionally change the climate on this planet and then provided you with an example how.

 

[ABM]

New Scientist is pretty reputable.

And I never said which would kill more. Not sure why you quoted that. I asked you can we intentionally change the climate on this planet and then provided you with an example how.

The 'G' in PapaG stands for Groove. Beware, or you'll get lured right into it.