- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,079
- Likes
- 10,919
- Points
- 113
Probably. I bet there would be far worse offers though. I don't think it is outrageous with the right 1st round pick included.
Picks. Plural.
And add players, too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably. I bet there would be far worse offers though. I don't think it is outrageous with the right 1st round pick included.
Instead of losing Ezeli's ~$7M off the books, you'd be adding $11M (or whatever Bogut signs for). Our starting point is already over the LT.
Butler is amazing but what you are stating is a package for a top 10 player. So I am going to disagree with that needed for Butler.Picks. Plural.
And add players, too.
Are there 10 players better than Butler right now?Butler is amazing but what you are stating is a package for a top 10 player. So I am going to disagree with that needed for Butler.
Doesn't matter though. If it is then it isn't going to happen from any team.
ESPN's Hollinger stats have Butler 5th in the league in total value contributed to his team, and 6th in their RPM stat. Yes, he's probably a top 10 playerAre there 10 players better than Butler right now?
26 PER, great percentages, and great defense. I might stick him higher than Dame.
But CJ is a star!I think they'd get a better offer than just CJ.
Are there 10 players better than Butler right now?
26 PER, great percentages, and great defense. I might stick him higher than Dame. I'd put him right up there with Kawhi and above PG.
But CJ is a star!
WHATSAMATTER MINSTREL, SALTY ABOUT THE ELECTION!?!?!?I'd trade Lillard for Butler.
Olshey: sees "sign and trade" and gets it backwards.Who cares, he signed Aminu after trading him.
I'd trade Lillard for Butler. I think McCollum is showing that he can dominate without Lillard and it's not like he'd be alone if the team got Butler. I'm actually not sure why Chicago would trade Butler.
Based on what we've seen this team do over the past few games with Dame out, if there were any way to add Butler to it, you have to do it.That's actually an interesting suggestion. Butler's game is actually much more similar to Dame's than C.J.'s.
Both Butler and Dame are better are driving, finishing and getting to the line than C.J. C.J. is a better 3-point shooter and has a better mid range game than either. Dame and Butler, while it sounds great, may be slightly redundant offensively, where C.J., with his 3-point and mid range game may be a better compliment to either.
I can see Butler and C.J. working well together.
Do you give up the face of the franchise for a bigger, better defending, slightly older player with similar offensive skills?
BNM
Ric Bucher (LOL, didn't know he was still doing NBA stuff) says Bulls are shopping Jimmy Butler.
True. Last season I believe CHI would have sold fairly low on him (like, I have little doubt we could have traded CJ straight up for him). CHI management made it quite clear they didn't particularly like him, and thought he was a shit "leader". I think it was Noah and...eh, my memory is hazy, but some other vet players, who really didn't like Butler and the way he interacted with and treated his teammates.Also also: I kinda had the impression he rubs teammates the wrong way. Dunno how I got that, though.
Those aren't the only reasons. He's a shithead. That's why CHI wants to trade him. Yes, on the floor, he's a better player than CJ. But I'm quite certain CHI would rather have CJ as their leader.The only reasons you don't do a C.J. plus whatever it takes not named Lillard for Butler trade are:
1) Butler is 2 years older.
2) Butler can't play PG. So, we'd need to get a better back up PG than Shabazz Napier.
Those are pretty lame ass reasons for not going all in to land one of the top 2-way players in the game during the prime of his career.
If they are really shopping Butler, doesn't that mean they are blowing it up; if so it would seems they would be looking for lottery picks.I think they'd get a better offer than just CJ.
If they are really shopping Butler, doesn't that mean they are blowing it up; if so it would seems they would be looking for lottery picks.
Not if we get Butler. Also, probably not even if we don't get Butler. But hopefully CHI wouldn't think about that!Hey! We've got one of those!
And a player to build around and a small forward.If they are really shopping Butler, doesn't that mean they are blowing it up; if so it would seems they would be looking for lottery picks.
Feb 28. I think I read that today.
23rd, my bad.